Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.project > #12561

Rethink about who we (Debian) are in rapid dev cycle of deep learning

From Free unofficial Italian translation - FUIT <freeunofficialitaliantranslation@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.project
Subject Rethink about who we (Debian) are in rapid dev cycle of deep learning
Date 2022-01-14 09:30 +0100
Message-ID <DFq89-3Yj-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <DEW0p-7VF-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <DFg8N-5tJ-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Thanks Davide, for talking about this. This is not just a legal problem, but a de facto reality implemented in disregard of any right to freedom. In order to prevent artificial intelligence from being used against the privacy of third parties, it is necessary to eliminate "the opportunity" (following the model of the fraud triangle, which includes cyber fraud), informing people about "cyber insecurity" and the undesirable effects of databases. It might seem like a trivial solution, but sometimes the simplest tools are the best.
I personally thank the Debian teams and AI developers for their invaluable contribution.





Back to linux.debian.project | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Rethink about who we (Debian) are in rapid dev cycle of deep learning "M. Zhou" <lumin@debian.org> - 2022-01-13 01:20 +0100
  Re: Rethink about who we (Debian) are in rapid dev cycle of deep learning Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2022-01-13 12:20 +0100
  Re: Rethink about who we (Debian) are in rapid dev cycle of deep learning Davide Prina <davide.prina@gmail.com> - 2022-01-13 22:50 +0100
    Rethink about who we (Debian) are in rapid dev cycle of deep learning Free unofficial Italian translation - FUIT <freeunofficialitaliantranslation@yahoo.com> - 2022-01-14 09:30 +0100
    Re: Rethink about who we (Debian) are in rapid dev cycle of deep learning <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2022-01-14 10:20 +0100
      Rethink about who we (Debian) are in rapid dev cycle of deep learning Free unofficial Italian translation - FUIT <freeunofficialitaliantranslation@yahoo.com> - 2022-01-14 11:50 +0100
      Re: Rethink about who we (Debian) are in rapid dev cycle of deep learning Davide Prina <davide.prina@gmail.com> - 2022-01-15 12:20 +0100
        Re: Rethink about who we (Debian) are in rapid dev cycle of deep learning <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2022-01-15 14:40 +0100
    Re: Rethink about who we (Debian) are in rapid dev cycle of deep learning Thomas Goirand <thomas@goirand.fr> - 2022-01-14 12:20 +0100
      Rethink about who we (Debian) are in rapid dev cycle of deep learning Free unofficial Italian translation - FUIT <freeunofficialitaliantranslation@yahoo.com> - 2022-01-14 12:40 +0100
      Re: Switzerland and EU (WAS: Rethink about who we (Debian) are in rapid dev cycle of deep learning) Davide Prina <davide.prina@gmail.com> - 2022-01-14 21:00 +0100
  Re: Rethink about who we (Debian) are in rapid dev cycle of deep learning Gard Spreemann <gspr@nonempty.org> - 2022-01-14 16:00 +0100
    Re: Rethink about who we (Debian) are in rapid dev cycle of deep learning "M. Zhou" <lumin@debian.org> - 2022-01-14 17:00 +0100
      Re: Rethink about who we (Debian) are in rapid dev cycle of deep learning <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2022-01-14 20:20 +0100
        Re: Rethink about who we (Debian) are in rapid dev cycle of deep learning Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2022-01-15 14:20 +0100
  Re: Rethink about who we (Debian) are in rapid dev cycle of deep learning Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2022-01-16 03:30 +0100
    Re: Rethink about who we (Debian) are in rapid dev cycle of deep learning "M. Zhou" <lumin@debian.org> - 2022-01-16 03:40 +0100

csiph-web