Re: Rethink about who we (Debian) are in rapid dev cycle of deep learning

From	<tomas@tuxteam.de>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.project
Subject	Re: Rethink about who we (Debian) are in rapid dev cycle of deep learning
Date	2022-01-15 14:40 +0100
Message-ID	<DFRrH-5q6-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<DEW0p-7VF-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <DFg8N-5tJ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <DFqUy-4zT-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <DFPgd-4cp-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 10:45:35AM +0100, Davide Prina wrote:
> On 14/01/22 07:01, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:

[...] 

> > That said, to have a workable face recognition, [...] you'll have to collect
> > consent from all those face "providers".
> 
> I think that is not so simple. The reply can be very long and articulated, I
> will try to be very concise and let you know some points that I think can be
> very "interesting".

Basically, we do agree: perhaps "collect consent" was a bit sloppy and
suggested an one-time action. That wasn't what I wanted to convey -- for
each image you use in your training set, you'd have to keep enough
metadata to document the person's consent (and to make revocation
possible). At each change, you'd have to re-train your model (or do
something equivalent).

Cheers
-- 
t

Thread

Rethink about who we (Debian) are in rapid dev cycle of deep learning "M. Zhou" <lumin@debian.org> - 2022-01-13 01:20 +0100
  Re: Rethink about who we (Debian) are in rapid dev cycle of deep learning Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2022-01-13 12:20 +0100
  Re: Rethink about who we (Debian) are in rapid dev cycle of deep learning Davide Prina <davide.prina@gmail.com> - 2022-01-13 22:50 +0100
    Rethink about who we (Debian) are in rapid dev cycle of deep learning Free unofficial Italian translation - FUIT <freeunofficialitaliantranslation@yahoo.com> - 2022-01-14 09:30 +0100
    Re: Rethink about who we (Debian) are in rapid dev cycle of deep learning <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2022-01-14 10:20 +0100
      Rethink about who we (Debian) are in rapid dev cycle of deep learning Free unofficial Italian translation - FUIT <freeunofficialitaliantranslation@yahoo.com> - 2022-01-14 11:50 +0100
      Re: Rethink about who we (Debian) are in rapid dev cycle of deep learning Davide Prina <davide.prina@gmail.com> - 2022-01-15 12:20 +0100
        Re: Rethink about who we (Debian) are in rapid dev cycle of deep learning <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2022-01-15 14:40 +0100
    Re: Rethink about who we (Debian) are in rapid dev cycle of deep learning Thomas Goirand <thomas@goirand.fr> - 2022-01-14 12:20 +0100
      Rethink about who we (Debian) are in rapid dev cycle of deep learning Free unofficial Italian translation - FUIT <freeunofficialitaliantranslation@yahoo.com> - 2022-01-14 12:40 +0100
      Re: Switzerland and EU (WAS: Rethink about who we (Debian) are in rapid dev cycle of deep learning) Davide Prina <davide.prina@gmail.com> - 2022-01-14 21:00 +0100
  Re: Rethink about who we (Debian) are in rapid dev cycle of deep learning Gard Spreemann <gspr@nonempty.org> - 2022-01-14 16:00 +0100
    Re: Rethink about who we (Debian) are in rapid dev cycle of deep learning "M. Zhou" <lumin@debian.org> - 2022-01-14 17:00 +0100
      Re: Rethink about who we (Debian) are in rapid dev cycle of deep learning <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2022-01-14 20:20 +0100
        Re: Rethink about who we (Debian) are in rapid dev cycle of deep learning Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2022-01-15 14:20 +0100
  Re: Rethink about who we (Debian) are in rapid dev cycle of deep learning Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2022-01-16 03:30 +0100
    Re: Rethink about who we (Debian) are in rapid dev cycle of deep learning "M. Zhou" <lumin@debian.org> - 2022-01-16 03:40 +0100

csiph-web