Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #386158
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: My code is dense, and hard to read, like the Washington Post. |
| Date | 2016-12-23 15:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D482F0F8.85F48%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <o3jsu7$he6$1@pcls7.std.com> <mbuq5cpls71t5eoq0mqo32lspj1l3vjhsr@4ax.com> <o3jveq$ll6$2@dont-email.me> <D482D7F6.85EDE%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <o3k5gr$c3c$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 12/23/16, 2:40 PM, in article o3k5gr$c3c$1@dont-email.me, "Peter Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: > The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: > >> On 12/23/16, 12:56 PM, in article o3jveq$ll6$2@dont-email.me, "Peter >> Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >> >>> chrisv wrote: >>> >>>> Michael Moroney wrote: >>>> >>>>> Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> writes: >>>>>> >>>>>> The "OCR A" font ( Optical Character Recognition ) is best. >>>>> >>>>> Fugly. Why a font intended for computers instead of one for >>>>> humans? >>>> >>>> Because the kook fancies himself being "computer-like". Like a >>>> computer, he has no problem with code that is "dense and hard to >>>> read". >>>> >>> >>> The only dense stuff here is the years old shit residing in Relfs head. >>> His "code" is ridiculous. It is an example how *not* to do it, in any >>> circumstances >> >> Would love for you to show how to do it right. >> > > Actually, there are guidelines for that. Not that you would know anything > about that, but those exist. For a reason: The code is better readable > > https://isocpp.org/wiki/faq/coding-standards > https://google.github.io/styleguide/cppguide.html > > Give some hints what to do and what to avoid. You should not look into it. > You understand nothing Interesting at your level of understanding you would interpret my request as one to point to coding standards. I can see that from someone who has no clue what coding even means. I am always amazed at how lost you are. Anyway, the idea was to have you show some of YOUR code... but you don't have any to show. No big deal. -- "I started Linux as a desktop operating system. And it's the only area where Linux hasn't completely taken over. That just annoys the hell out of me." -- Linus Torvalds
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Technical challenge for DFS Incubus <incubus9536612@gmail.com> - 2016-12-16 07:18 -0800
Re: Technical challenge for DFS DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-12-16 11:32 -0500
Re: Technical challenge for DFS DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-12-16 11:37 -0500
Re: Technical challenge for DFS Incubus <incubus9536612@gmail.com> - 2016-12-16 08:50 -0800
Re: Technical challenge for DFS Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-12-16 09:32 -0800
Loop(100) Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-12-17 12:34 -0800
Re: Loop(100) DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-12-18 00:44 -0500
Command Line jockies use plenty of aliases, no ? ! Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-12-17 21:59 -0800
Re: Loop(100) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-19 17:20 +0000
I don't worry about "optimizations", don't need to. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-12-19 10:56 -0800
Re: I don't worry about "optimizations", don't need to. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-12-19 11:23 -0800
Re: I don't worry about "optimizations", don't need to. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-20 12:30 +0000
Other people's code is hard to learn/modify. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-12-20 06:06 -0800
Re: Other people's code is hard to learn/modify. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-12-20 15:31 +0100
Re: Other people's code is hard to learn/modify. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-12-20 09:04 -0600
Re: Other people's code is hard to learn/modify. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-20 15:06 +0000
What The Fuck is wrong with your peers ? ! Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-12-20 09:59 -0800
Re: What The Fuck is wrong with your peers ? ! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-20 23:22 +0000
I won, bigly. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-12-20 16:15 -0800
Re: I won, bigly. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-12-21 00:01 -0500
AutoFormatting hides the fingerprints. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-12-21 02:55 -0800
Re: AutoFormatting hides the fingerprints. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-12-21 14:33 +0100
Re: AutoFormatting hides the fingerprints. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-22 03:21 +0000
My code is dense, and hard to read, like the Washington Post. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-12-22 02:36 -0800
Re: My code is dense, and hard to read, like the Washington Post. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-22 21:22 +0000
Re: My code is dense, and hard to read, like the Washington Post. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-12-23 07:54 -0600
Re: My code is dense, and hard to read, like the Washington Post. flatfish+++ <flatfish@linuxmail.org> - 2016-12-23 09:35 -0500
Re: My code is dense, and hard to read, like the Washington Post. Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-12-23 08:46 -0600
Re: My code is dense, and hard to read, like the Washington Post. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-23 16:21 +0000
My code is dense, and hard to read, like the Washington Post. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-12-23 08:52 -0800
Re: My code is dense, and hard to read, like the Washington Post. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-23 19:12 +0000
Re: My code is dense, and hard to read, like the Washington Post. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-12-23 13:27 -0600
Re: My code is dense, and hard to read, like the Washington Post. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-12-23 20:56 +0100
Re: My code is dense, and hard to read, like the Washington Post. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-12-23 13:32 -0700
Re: My code is dense, and hard to read, like the Washington Post. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-12-23 22:40 +0100
Re: My code is dense, and hard to read, like the Washington Post. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-12-23 15:19 -0700
Re: My code is dense, and hard to read, like the Washington Post. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-12-23 14:30 -0800
My C++ Coding Standards ( apologies to Bjarne Stroustrup ). Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-12-23 17:06 -0800
Re: My C++ Coding Standards ( apologies to Bjarne Stroustrup ). Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-12-24 10:40 +0100
Re: My code is dense, and hard to read, like the Washington Post. jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-12-24 14:04 +0000
Someday, if you're lucky, you'll know the freedoms I enjoy. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-12-23 08:05 -0800
Re: My code is dense, and hard to read, like the Washington Post. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-12-23 13:49 -0700
Re: I won, bigly. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-12-21 09:09 -0500
Re: I won, bigly. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-21 17:37 -0500
Re: What The Fuck is wrong with your peers ? ! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-12-21 07:14 -0600
csiph-web