Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #312619

Re: Get Off COLA, Freak!

From Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: Get Off COLA, Freak!
Date 2015-08-05 12:26 -0700
Message-ID <D1E7B163.562DD%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink)
References <mpr51a$jlo$1@dont-email.me> <1aa2020f-8926-445c-acb8-591ae0854ea2@googlegroups.com> <snmvnc8.3j@rooftop.invalid> <mptmlf$g2p$3@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

On 8/5/15, 12:04 PM, in article mptmlf$g2p$3@dont-email.me, "A.M" <.m@nsn.s>
wrote:

> On 2015-08-05 1:26 PM, owl wrote:
>> John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, August 4, 2015 at 3:51:40 PM UTC-4, A.M wrote:
>>>> Linux is such shit it's not even funny.
>>>> 
>>>> Oh by the way, I'm back because some asshole decided to change the
>>>> subject header of my exit announcement... probably Ass Storm. I actually
>>>> left and now your stupidity brought me back. You deserve applause, loser.
>> 
>> 
>>> Get Off COLA, Freak!
>> 
>> LOL
> 
> LOL, that's the most awesome self-nuke there.

Owl has been in a weird mood recently... just spewing nonsense beyond
belief. Just for fun... from the last couple days of his trolling:

In reference to comments about this page:
<http://www.unix.org/what_is_unix/history_timeline.html>
    -----
    2007 Apple Mac OS X certified to UNIX 03.
    2010 UNIX on the Desktop
         Apple reports 50 million desktops and growing -- these are
         Certified UNIX systems.
    -----

  Owl:
    -----
    What makes you think that those fifty million are not all on
    Yosemite?
    -----
    Look, dumbass... these numbers are based on people having
    *upgraded* to Yosemite.
    -----
    There was no mention of "2010" until you *finally* posted a link
    to that page. 
    -----
    When you first brought up the fifty million number, there was no
    mention of 2010.
    -----
So in 2010 Owl thinks 50 million people UPGRADED to Yosemite, an OS X
version that did not exist, but until I noted this error of his the page did
not even mention that it was in reference to 2010. WTF?

  Owl:
    -----
    One OS X distro is registered.
    -----
But OS X only has *one* distro! They do not even have a separate server
option any more (it is just added software).

And then he went on:
    -----
    | One Linux distro is registered. If one OS X being registered
    | UNIX means that all OS X is UNIX, then one Linux distro being
    | registered means that all Linux is UNIX.
    -----
Owl completely missed the fact that OS X has one and only one distro. There
are many distros based on Linux (Mint, Ubuntu, PCLOS, Debian, etc... by the
way, contrary to his claim, NONE of the ones I mentioned are certified UNIX
or ever have been).

But Owl kept repeating his mistaken claim:
    -----
    There are multiple distros of OS X.
    -----
Completely and utterly wrong of him. One and only one distro of OS X. When
called out in this it was clear he did not know the difference between a
DISTRO and a RELEASE. He was completely lost.

And showing off his view of what is and is not UNIX:
    -----
    Only Yosemite is UNIX
    -----
Utter nonsense. To be fair to him MAYBE he meant only one release of OS X,
but given his confusion as to what is a distro and what is a release it is
impossible to say for sure.


-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Shadow of Mordor's embarrassing performance on Linux detailed "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-08-04 15:51 -0400
  Re: Shadow of Mordor's embarrassing performance on Linux detailed Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 13:06 -0700
  Re: Shadow of Mordor's embarrassing performance on Linux detailed owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-08-04 22:49 +0000
  Get Off COLA, Freak! John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 03:34 -0700
    Re: Get Off COLA, Freak! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-08-05 08:42 -0400
    Re: Get Off COLA, Freak! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-08-05 17:26 +0000
      Re: Get Off COLA, Freak! "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-08-05 15:04 -0400
        Re: Get Off COLA, Freak! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-05 12:26 -0700
        Re: Get Off COLA, Freak! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-08-05 20:56 +0000

csiph-web