Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #291560
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: Any CoW technology like btrfs or zfs from the M$ or iExpensive Camps? |
| Date | 2015-04-25 11:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D1612956.4AC62%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <D1601798.4AC29%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <mheoup$62b$1@dont-email.me> <mhfj66$3ee$1@dont-email.me> <D161186D.4AC5A%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <mhgljt$33f$1@dont-email.me> |
On 4/25/15, 11:16 AM, in article mhgljt$33f$1@dont-email.me, "Peter
Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
...
>> And now the quote with context!
>>
>
> Idiot. Snit Slimeball claimed that he used ReiserFS exclusivly. And he
> claimed:
>
> "I remember thinking that Linux was incredibly unstable but it
> might just have been reiserfs itself."
>
> It is quite irrelevant if linux was itself "very unstable" or if it was just
> ReiserFS. Because in both cases it would have resulted in a very unstable
> system.
>
> So that Piece of a Snit claimed that he used a "very unstable system".
> Exactly what I wrote. No amount of weasel wording from you will change that
> fact
>
> Apart from the fact that it is (again) a snittish lie. Linux was years
> before that much more stable than windows has ever achieved
My comments:
---------------------------------------------------------------
Slimer:
-----
|| Is reiserfs still being actively developed? You'd think they
|| would have shunned that filesystem after what the author did to
|| his family.
||
| I don't know. I used it for a while years ago. I wouldn't use
| it now on moral grounds.
|
Whenever I installed Linux around 2003/2004, I used it
exclusively. At the time, I remember thinking that Linux was
incredibly unstable but it might just have been reiserfs itself.
-----
It is completely clear Slimer was in in reference to the idea that when he
used Linux in 2003/2004, he exclusively used reiserfs. But Peter Köhlmann
responded with:
Peter Köhlmann:
-----
Certainly. You used an "incredibly unstable" OS "exclusively
around 2003/2004". After all, it ran so "incredibly unstable" you
felt the need to run it "exclusively around 2003/2004"
-----
Listen, Peter, we *all* make mistakes. You made one here. The honest and
honorable thing to do would be to simply say, "whoops, I misread that and
thought you meant you used Linux exclusively."
But it is 100% predictable you will *not* do this. You will never do this.
---------------------------------------------------------------
My prediction is being proved correct.
Now my next prediction: neither DFS nor Steve Carroll nor any of the
"advocates" will call Peter out on this. They pretend to care about honesty
but they do not. They will NEVER call Peter out on this lie of his.
Just to prove me wrong Carroll *might* make a brief comment... so I will say
this is only 98% predictable. :)
Those who troll COLA are very easy to predict in their dishonesty.
--
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Any CoW technology like btrfs or zfs from the M$ or iExpensive Camps? taka0038@gmail.com - 2015-04-24 06:40 -0700
Re: Any CoW technology like btrfs or zfs from the M$ or iExpensive Camps? Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-24 15:50 +0200
Re: Any CoW technology like btrfs or zfs from the M$ or iExpensive Camps? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-24 11:37 -0600
Re: Any CoW technology like btrfs or zfs from the M$ or iExpensive Camps? Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-24 10:15 -0400
Re: Any CoW technology like btrfs or zfs from the M$ or iExpensive Camps? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-24 20:33 +0000
Re: Any CoW technology like btrfs or zfs from the M$ or iExpensive Camps? Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-24 17:44 -0400
Re: Any CoW technology like btrfs or zfs from the M$ or iExpensive Camps? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-24 23:58 +0200
Re: Any CoW technology like btrfs or zfs from the M$ or iExpensive Camps? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-24 22:00 +0000
Re: Any CoW technology like btrfs or zfs from the M$ or iExpensive Camps? Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-24 18:26 -0400
Re: Any CoW technology like btrfs or zfs from the M$ or iExpensive Camps? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-25 00:36 +0200
Re: Any CoW technology like btrfs or zfs from the M$ or iExpensive Camps? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-24 15:54 -0700
Re: Any CoW technology like btrfs or zfs from the M$ or iExpensive Camps? Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-24 21:01 -0400
Re: Any CoW technology like btrfs or zfs from the M$ or iExpensive Camps? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-24 18:52 -0700
Re: Any CoW technology like btrfs or zfs from the M$ or iExpensive Camps? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-25 10:28 +0200
Re: Any CoW technology like btrfs or zfs from the M$ or iExpensive Camps? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-25 10:09 -0700
Re: Any CoW technology like btrfs or zfs from the M$ or iExpensive Camps? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-25 20:16 +0200
Re: Any CoW technology like btrfs or zfs from the M$ or iExpensive Camps? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-25 11:21 -0700
Re: Any CoW technology like btrfs or zfs from the M$ or iExpensive Camps? Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-25 20:50 +0200
Re: Any CoW technology like btrfs or zfs from the M$ or iExpensive Camps? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-25 16:36 -0400
Re: Any CoW technology like btrfs or zfs from the M$ or iExpensive Camps? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-27 08:07 -0500
Re: Any CoW technology like btrfs or zfs from the M$ or iExpensive Camps? Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-25 14:36 -0400
Re: Any CoW technology like btrfs or zfs from the M$ or iExpensive Camps? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-25 15:11 -0700
Re: Any CoW technology like btrfs or zfs from the M$ or iExpensive Camps? Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-25 18:18 -0400
Re: Any CoW technology like btrfs or zfs from the M$ or iExpensive Camps? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-25 15:30 -0700
Re: Any CoW technology like btrfs or zfs from the M$ or iExpensive Camps? Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-25 18:44 -0400
Re: Any CoW technology like btrfs or zfs from the M$ or iExpensive Camps? Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-25 20:55 -0400
Re: Any CoW technology like btrfs or zfs from the M$ or iExpensive Camps? Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-25 21:38 -0400
Re: Any CoW technology like btrfs or zfs from the M$ or iExpensive Camps? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-25 18:47 -0700
Re: Any CoW technology like btrfs or zfs from the M$ or iExpensive Camps? Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-25 21:58 -0400
Re: Any CoW technology like btrfs or zfs from the M$ or iExpensive Camps? Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-25 22:10 -0400
Re: Any CoW technology like btrfs or zfs from the M$ or iExpensive Camps? Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-25 22:31 -0400
Re: Any CoW technology like btrfs or zfs from the M$ or iExpensive Camps? Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-25 22:34 -0400
Re: Any CoW technology like btrfs or zfs from the M$ or iExpensive Camps? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-25 19:36 -0700
Re: Any CoW technology like btrfs or zfs from the M$ or iExpensive Camps? Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-25 22:38 -0400
Re: Any CoW technology like btrfs or zfs from the M$ or iExpensive Camps? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-25 19:56 -0700
Re: Any CoW technology like btrfs or zfs from the M$ or iExpensive Camps? Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-25 23:15 -0400
Re: Any CoW technology like btrfs or zfs from the M$ or iExpensive Camps? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-25 20:27 -0700
Re: Any CoW technology like btrfs or zfs from the M$ or iExpensive Camps? Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-26 09:13 -0400
Re: Any CoW technology like btrfs or zfs from the M$ or iExpensive Camps? Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-26 12:40 -0400
Re: Any CoW technology like btrfs or zfs from the M$ or iExpensive Camps? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-26 10:33 -0700
Re: Any CoW technology like btrfs or zfs from the M$ or iExpensive Camps? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-25 19:38 -0700
Re: Any CoW technology like btrfs or zfs from the M$ or iExpensive Camps? Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-25 20:52 -0400
Re: Any CoW technology like btrfs or zfs from the M$ or iExpensive Camps? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-27 09:55 -0500
Re: Any CoW technology like btrfs or zfs from the M$ or iExpensive Camps? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-27 11:17 -0400
Re: Any CoW technology like btrfs or zfs from the M$ or iExpensive Camps? Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-27 13:56 -0400
Re: Any CoW technology like btrfs or zfs from the M$ or iExpensive Camps? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-27 11:11 -0700
Re: Any CoW technology like btrfs or zfs from the M$ or iExpensive Camps? Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-27 17:17 -0400
Re: Any CoW technology like btrfs or zfs from the M$ or iExpensive Camps? Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-27 18:07 -0400
Re: Any CoW technology like btrfs or zfs from the M$ or iExpensive Camps? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-27 16:52 -0700
Re: Any CoW technology like btrfs or zfs from the M$ or iExpensive Camps? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-28 09:41 -0500
What a putz that Taka be, or should I say Penis? John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-04-25 03:22 -0700
Re: What a putz that Taka be, or should I say Penis? taka0038@gmail.com - 2015-04-25 09:17 -0700
csiph-web