Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #236534

Re: Can MATE DE be attractive as well as functional

From Peter Ehlert <pb21a@sdi-baja.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: Can MATE DE be attractive as well as functional
Date 2021-06-27 14:20 +0200
Message-ID <CuBVv-3c1-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <CunfP-22e-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <Cuo2e-2x1-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 6/26/21 2:07 PM, Bret Busby wrote:
> On 27/6/21 4:30 am, Richard Owlett wrote:
>> Can icons placed on desktop be in a regular geometric pattern.
>> I think it tries to do that. But over the years I've had differing 
>> monitor geometries. Does operator have any control over where next 
>> icon is placed?
>>
>> Just curious ;/
>> TIA
>>
>
> But, with MATE, whilst a Debian-mate mailing lists exists, to which 
> reference was made, in response to a previous thread involving a query 
> about MATE running on Debian, the Debian-mate list appears to have 
> posts relating to only bug reports, and, announcements or security 
> announcements.
>
true, not as I would expect.
>
> The question then arises - would it be worthwhile, to start a users 
> mailing list, for MATE desktop interface (and applications that are 
> part of the MATE environment), to deal with MATE users across 
> different platforms?
>
yes, a Debian mate user list would be quite welcome
>
>
> So, I wonder about the worthwhileness (?) of setting up a new MATE 
> users mailing list.
I do see questions here about other platforms, and Mate, but they kinda 
get lost.

one needs watch daily, or more often.

UbuntuMATE is quite different, they don't use the full suite of Mate 
apps, using odd (to me) substitute...and continues to go their own way.

Most of the Ubuntu derivatives do the same, often loosing functions and 
features in the process.

a more central location for Mate specific Q&A would be welcome

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Can MATE DE be attractive as well as functional Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2021-06-26 22:40 +0200
  Re: Can MATE DE be attractive as well as functional Bret Busby <bret@busby.net> - 2021-06-26 23:30 +0200
    Re: Can MATE DE be attractive as well as functional Bret Busby <bret@busby.net> - 2021-06-27 00:20 +0200
      Re: Can MATE DE be attractive as well as functional Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2021-06-27 11:30 +0200
    Re: Can MATE DE be attractive as well as functional Peter Ehlert <pb21a@sdi-baja.com> - 2021-06-27 14:20 +0200
  Resolved: Can MATE DE be attractive as well as functional Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2021-06-27 13:00 +0200
    Re: Resolved: Can MATE DE be attractive as well as functional Peter Ehlert <pb21a@sdi-baja.com> - 2021-06-27 14:20 +0200
  Re: Can MATE DE be attractive as well as functional Peter Ehlert <pb21a@sdi-baja.com> - 2021-06-27 14:10 +0200

csiph-web