Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.bugs.rc > #301534

Bug#986709: rsnapshot is stable, not dead

From Michael Lustfield <michael@lustfield.net>
Newsgroups linux.debian.bugs.rc
Subject Bug#986709: rsnapshot is stable, not dead
Date 2021-05-28 22:50 +0200
Message-ID <CjRAC-JG-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <C0Y9z-1xY-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <CjQbw-8sW-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <C0Y9z-1xY-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <CjQbw-8sW-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Fri, 28 May 2021 19:56:47 +0100
David Cantrell <david@cantrell.org.uk> wrote:

> [...]
> So what, exactly, is unmaintained about it? Looks to me like it has 
> exactly the amount of maintenance that is required for mature software.

I'm not going to strawman my justifications; it's not terribly relevant anyway.
Absolutely anyone is free to disagree with me and continue maintenance of the
package. If needed, I'll even sponsor the upload.

https://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers (read 1-2, start at 3)

Back to linux.debian.bugs.rc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Bug#986709: rsnapshot is stable, not dead David Cantrell <david@cantrell.org.uk> - 2021-05-28 21:20 +0200
  Bug#986709: rsnapshot is stable, not dead Michael Lustfield <michael@lustfield.net> - 2021-05-28 22:50 +0200
    Bug#986709: rsnapshot is stable, not dead Sam Pinkus <sgpinkus@gmail.com> - 2021-06-20 02:30 +0200

csiph-web