Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.security > #5952

Re: no-dsa for Samba CVEs in Debian.

From Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.security
Subject Re: no-dsa for Samba CVEs in Debian.
Date 2021-05-18 07:20 +0200
Message-ID <Cg0j7-7WQ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <CdJPr-6wI-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <CdPrQ-1Ds-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <CdRWF-2Ws-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <CfRSx-2Pj-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <CfTrl-3zQ-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 09:38:30AM +1200, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-05-17 at 22:17 +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> > Hello Andrew,
> > 
> > I read your message as well as
> > https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-samba-maint/2021-May/022771.html
> > and I believe I can add a few more pointers, as part of the
> > (separate)
> > Debian Long Term Support (LTS) team.
> > 
> > (I'm a bit confused because you're listed as a Debian package
> > maintainer at https://packages.debian.org/sid/samba but I assume
> > you're asking from upstream / Samba maintainers' point of view.)
> 
> Yeah, I helped build the current monster, and try to help out when I
> can, mostly in terms of advise, but I've increasingly stepped back.  My
> various Debian privileges, such as I had them, have expired and I
> should probably be retired to 'lurker' status.
> 
> > First "no-dsa" (and its sub-states ignored/postponed) is described
> > at:
> > https://security-team.debian.org/security_tracker.html#issues-not-warranting-a-security-advisory
> > Note that no-dsa usually means fixing the issue is not
> > urgent/critical,
> > needs not high-priority tracking/action from the Security Team, but
> > the package maintainer(s) may track and prepare a fix nonetheless,
> > e.g. through Debian's quarterly point releases (10.x).
> > Likewise, I read "Minor issue" as "non-critical".
> > 
> > By contrast, "unimportant" is a lesser severity state, and matching
> > CVEs will likely never be fixed due to inapplicability in Debian or
> > questionable security relevance.
> 
> Can you clarify the mapping between "Minor issue"/"non-critical" and
> the Severity levels table?  Samba generally only issues a CVE for
> things that are "medium" or above.

You mean the NVD severities? We do not use those values for deciding
the Debian specific assessment if an issue warrants a DSA or not, but
the tracker displays them them as part of fetching the NVD data.

Regards,
Salvatore

Back to linux.debian.security | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Is this the right place to discuss no-dsa choices? Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> - 2021-05-12 01:20 +0200
  Re: Is this the right place to discuss no-dsa choices? Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2021-05-12 07:20 +0200
    Re: Is this the right place to discuss no-dsa choices? Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> - 2021-05-12 10:00 +0200
      Re: Is this the right place to discuss no-dsa choices? Sylvain Beucler <beuc@beuc.net> - 2021-05-17 22:20 +0200
        no-dsa for Samba CVEs in Debian. Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> - 2021-05-18 00:00 +0200
          Re: no-dsa for Samba CVEs in Debian. Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2021-05-18 07:20 +0200
            Re: no-dsa for Samba CVEs in Debian. Sylvain Beucler <beuc@beuc.net> - 2021-05-19 17:00 +0200

csiph-web