Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.security > #5952
| From | Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.security |
| Subject | Re: no-dsa for Samba CVEs in Debian. |
| Date | 2021-05-18 07:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <Cg0j7-7WQ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <CdJPr-6wI-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <CdPrQ-1Ds-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <CdRWF-2Ws-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <CfRSx-2Pj-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <CfTrl-3zQ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 09:38:30AM +1200, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Mon, 2021-05-17 at 22:17 +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote: > > Hello Andrew, > > > > I read your message as well as > > https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-samba-maint/2021-May/022771.html > > and I believe I can add a few more pointers, as part of the > > (separate) > > Debian Long Term Support (LTS) team. > > > > (I'm a bit confused because you're listed as a Debian package > > maintainer at https://packages.debian.org/sid/samba but I assume > > you're asking from upstream / Samba maintainers' point of view.) > > Yeah, I helped build the current monster, and try to help out when I > can, mostly in terms of advise, but I've increasingly stepped back. My > various Debian privileges, such as I had them, have expired and I > should probably be retired to 'lurker' status. > > > First "no-dsa" (and its sub-states ignored/postponed) is described > > at: > > https://security-team.debian.org/security_tracker.html#issues-not-warranting-a-security-advisory > > Note that no-dsa usually means fixing the issue is not > > urgent/critical, > > needs not high-priority tracking/action from the Security Team, but > > the package maintainer(s) may track and prepare a fix nonetheless, > > e.g. through Debian's quarterly point releases (10.x). > > Likewise, I read "Minor issue" as "non-critical". > > > > By contrast, "unimportant" is a lesser severity state, and matching > > CVEs will likely never be fixed due to inapplicability in Debian or > > questionable security relevance. > > Can you clarify the mapping between "Minor issue"/"non-critical" and > the Severity levels table? Samba generally only issues a CVE for > things that are "medium" or above. You mean the NVD severities? We do not use those values for deciding the Debian specific assessment if an issue warrants a DSA or not, but the tracker displays them them as part of fetching the NVD data. Regards, Salvatore
Back to linux.debian.security | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is this the right place to discuss no-dsa choices? Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> - 2021-05-12 01:20 +0200
Re: Is this the right place to discuss no-dsa choices? Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2021-05-12 07:20 +0200
Re: Is this the right place to discuss no-dsa choices? Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> - 2021-05-12 10:00 +0200
Re: Is this the right place to discuss no-dsa choices? Sylvain Beucler <beuc@beuc.net> - 2021-05-17 22:20 +0200
no-dsa for Samba CVEs in Debian. Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> - 2021-05-18 00:00 +0200
Re: no-dsa for Samba CVEs in Debian. Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2021-05-18 07:20 +0200
Re: no-dsa for Samba CVEs in Debian. Sylvain Beucler <beuc@beuc.net> - 2021-05-19 17:00 +0200
csiph-web