Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.legal > #5896
| From | Ole Tange <tange@gnu.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.legal, linux.debian.bugs.dist |
| Subject | Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted |
| Date | 2021-08-30 19:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <CRTgB-cy-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <CRIOe-28f-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <CRIXT-2bo-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <CRPmG-6mv-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <CRPG1-6sr-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 3:38 PM Andreas Tille <andreas@fam-tille.de> wrote: : > I admit I also considered a wrapper but with a different functionality: > Simply check whether --citation was used before and if not do so. If you mean a wrapper similar to this, then that would be a compromise I can live with: if [ -t 2 -a ! -e "$HOME/.citation-run" ] ; then # Only run if stderr is a terminal (to avoid breaking scripts) parallel.real --citation touch "$HOME/.citation-run" fi parallel.real "$@" By testing if stderr is redirected this should avoid breaking scripts (e.g. cron jobs or similar). To me it would feel similar to a dialog box, where you have to click "Don't show this again" to continue the first time. This is not that uncommon in graphical tools, so there is some precedence for this. I find it less than optimal, but if we can find common ground on that, it would be a compromise I can live with. /Ole
Back to linux.debian.legal | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2021-08-30 08:30 +0200
Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted Tobias Frost <tobi@debian.org> - 2021-08-30 12:40 +0200
Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@lease-up.com> - 2021-08-30 15:20 +0200
Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted Andreas Tille <andreas@fam-tille.de> - 2021-08-30 16:00 +0200
Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted Ole Tange <tange@gnu.org> - 2021-08-30 19:50 +0200
Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted Tobias Frost <tobi@debian.org> - 2021-08-31 08:50 +0200
Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted Tobias Frost <tobi@debian.org> - 2021-08-31 09:00 +0200
Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2021-09-03 16:50 +0200
Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted Tobias Frost <tobi@debian.org> - 2021-09-03 17:00 +0200
Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@lease-up.com> - 2021-09-03 17:10 +0200
Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted Ole Tange <tange@gnu.org> - 2021-09-06 21:20 +0200
Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org> - 2021-09-07 11:40 +0200
Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted Ole Tange <tange@gnu.org> - 2021-09-11 22:00 +0200
Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2021-09-13 05:10 +0200
Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org> - 2021-09-13 09:10 +0200
Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org> - 2021-09-07 11:40 +0200
Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted Ole Tange <tange@gnu.org> - 2021-08-31 20:40 +0200
csiph-web