Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.devel > #101304
| From | Tomas Pospisek <tpo2@sourcepole.ch> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.devel |
| Subject | Re: BTS not archiving Bcc: mails? [was: Re: inconsistent mailgraph settings] |
| Date | 2021-08-23 07:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <CPaxk-2QP-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <COuHM-1LV-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <COw6R-2OC-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <CP0oh-4Te-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <CP0xX-4Wh-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <CP60F-8l7-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 23.08.21 02:21, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2021-08-22 23:32:15 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 08:25:41PM +0200, Tomas Pospisek wrote: >>> Wouldn't the Bcc'ed email that arrived to the BTS be visible in the bug's >>> log/archive (on the bug's page (https://bugs.debian.org/989734))? >> It's visible: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989734;msg=27 > > Where? I don't see any "close" or "done". > > Note that the "Done:" in the metadata at the top just reflects the > *current* status of the bug; it is currently also present at > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989734;msg=5 > > where the bug was obviously open. The thing is, if you close a bug report via `Bcc: 999999999999-close@bugs.debian.org` then the mail that arrives at the BTS does *not* have the 999999999999-close@bugs.debian.org address in the email header but only in the mail envelope - that is, when connecting the sending MTA will tell the BTS MTA "RCPT TO: 999999999999-close@bugs.debian.org" and that's it. This will close the bug, but the address 999999999999-close@bugs.debian.org will not be visible in the email that's archived... Not sure why people are using `Bcc: 999999999999-close@bugs.debian.org` in the first place. To hide that 999999999999-close@bugs.debian.org address from spammers? But then all the other addresses are visible...? :-/ *t
Back to linux.debian.devel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
inconsistent mailgraph settings Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2021-08-20 17:00 +0200
Re: inconsistent mailgraph settings Tomas Pospisek <tpo2@sourcepole.ch> - 2021-08-21 10:40 +0200
Re: inconsistent mailgraph settings Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org> - 2021-08-21 12:10 +0200
BTS not archiving Bcc: mails? [was: Re: inconsistent mailgraph settings] Tomas Pospisek <tpo2@sourcepole.ch> - 2021-08-22 20:30 +0200
Re: BTS not archiving Bcc: mails? [was: Re: inconsistent mailgraph settings] Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2021-08-22 20:40 +0200
Re: BTS not archiving Bcc: mails? [was: Re: inconsistent mailgraph settings] Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2021-08-23 02:30 +0200
Re: BTS not archiving Bcc: mails? [was: Re: inconsistent mailgraph settings] Tomas Pospisek <tpo2@sourcepole.ch> - 2021-08-23 07:20 +0200
Re: BTS not archiving Bcc: mails? [was: Re: inconsistent mailgraph settings] Holger Wansing <hwansing@mailbox.org> - 2021-08-23 08:00 +0200
Re: BTS not archiving Bcc: mails? [was: Re: inconsistent mailgraph settings]G Tim Woodall <debiandevel@woodall.me.uk> - 2021-08-23 08:50 +0200
Re: BTS not archiving Bcc: mails? [was: Re: inconsistent mailgraph settings]G Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2021-08-25 12:50 +0200
Re: BTS not archiving Bcc: mails? [was: Re: inconsistent mailgraph settings] Don Armstrong <don@debian.org> - 2021-08-27 02:10 +0200
Re: BTS not archiving Bcc: mails? [was: Re: inconsistent mailgraph settings] Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2021-08-23 09:30 +0200
Re: inconsistent mailgraph settings Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2021-08-23 02:40 +0200
Re: inconsistent mailgraph settings Tomas Pospisek <tpo2@sourcepole.ch> - 2021-08-23 07:30 +0200
Re: inconsistent mailgraph settings Tomas Pospisek <tpo2@sourcepole.ch> - 2021-08-23 07:40 +0200
csiph-web