Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.devel > #101306
| From | Tomas Pospisek <tpo2@sourcepole.ch> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.devel |
| Subject | Re: inconsistent mailgraph settings |
| Date | 2021-08-23 07:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <CPaQM-2XC-91@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <COe9Y-8jQ-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <COuHM-1LV-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <CP6al-8o8-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <CPaGZ-2TT-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 23.08.21 07:24, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
> On 23.08.21 02:35, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>> On 2021-08-21 10:36:04 +0200, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
>>> In particular it *seems* to work for him and he doesn't have access
>>> to your
>>> system where things apparently went wrong so it could be really hard
>>> for him
>>> to know. So what you can do is to try to debug *yourself* why the
>>> upgrade
>>> went wrong and come forth with some analysis that shows to root cause
>>> of the
>>> breakage. And then you can also propose a fix. I am sure that would
>>> make it
>>> a lot easier for the maintainer to do "the right thing".
>>
>> Unfortunately, that's too late, because the issue (at least one part
>> of it) occurred during the upgrade, and unfortunately, I can't install
>> the previous version (due to unsatisfied dependencies) to try to
>> reproduce the bug.
>>
>>>> While mailgraph was started on boot in the past, this stopped
>>>> working with the upgrade to Debian 10, and I had to enable it
>>>> again. So issues with the upgrade to Debian 11, but the mailgraph
>>>> package has not changed. And who knows what will happend with
>>>> the next upgrade...
>>>>
>>>> I can see in the debian/default.conf file:
>>>>
>>>> # Should Mailgraph start on boot (true|false) (default: true)
>>>> BOOT_START="true"
>>>>
>>>> So I don't understand what is the intent for the default settings.
>>>> To run it on boot or not???
>>>
>>> Evidently the package is offering a choice on whether to start or not to
>>> start mailgraph on boot. By virtue of that option existing it seems
>>> that not
>>> everybody wants mailgraph to be started on boot.
>>
>> Yes, but this option was honored in the previous version and
>> is no longer honored (note that there wasn't an announce of
>> any change).
>>
>>>> Note that I was already using systemd in Debian 9, so that it is
>>>> not normal that mailgraph stopped working after the upgrade to
>>>> Debian 10.
>>>
>>> Don't be all up in arms about the problem. Try to find out why it's
>>> broken
>>> and try to propose a fix and to work with the maintainer.
>>
>> I no longer have any Debian 9 machine.
>
> # apt-get install docker
> # docker pull debian:buster
> # docker run -ti debian:bullseye bash
> root@e6cbe6c64846:/# apt-get update && apt-get install mailgraph
Sorry, correction:
# apt-get install docker
# docker pull debian:stretch
# docker run -ti debian:stretch bash
root@e6cbe6c64846:/# apt-get update && apt-get install mailgraph
root@e6cbe6c64846:/# sed --in-place 's/stretch/buster/'
/etc/apt/source.list
root@e6cbe6c64846:/# apt-get update && apt-get dist-upgrade
Rebooting that docker container will throw away the changes I guess so
you'll need to put the commands above that you'd execute inside the
container in a Dockerfile:
$ cat Dockerfile
FROM debian:stretch
RUN apt-get update && apt-get install mailgraph
RUN sed --in-place 's/stretch/buster/' /etc/apt/source.list
RUN apt-get update && apt-get dist-upgrade
and create a new, dist-upgraded container:
$ docker build -t debian:stretch2buster Dockerfile
$ docker run -ti debian:stretch2buster bash
?
*t
Back to linux.debian.devel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
inconsistent mailgraph settings Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2021-08-20 17:00 +0200
Re: inconsistent mailgraph settings Tomas Pospisek <tpo2@sourcepole.ch> - 2021-08-21 10:40 +0200
Re: inconsistent mailgraph settings Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org> - 2021-08-21 12:10 +0200
BTS not archiving Bcc: mails? [was: Re: inconsistent mailgraph settings] Tomas Pospisek <tpo2@sourcepole.ch> - 2021-08-22 20:30 +0200
Re: BTS not archiving Bcc: mails? [was: Re: inconsistent mailgraph settings] Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2021-08-22 20:40 +0200
Re: BTS not archiving Bcc: mails? [was: Re: inconsistent mailgraph settings] Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2021-08-23 02:30 +0200
Re: BTS not archiving Bcc: mails? [was: Re: inconsistent mailgraph settings] Tomas Pospisek <tpo2@sourcepole.ch> - 2021-08-23 07:20 +0200
Re: BTS not archiving Bcc: mails? [was: Re: inconsistent mailgraph settings] Holger Wansing <hwansing@mailbox.org> - 2021-08-23 08:00 +0200
Re: BTS not archiving Bcc: mails? [was: Re: inconsistent mailgraph settings]G Tim Woodall <debiandevel@woodall.me.uk> - 2021-08-23 08:50 +0200
Re: BTS not archiving Bcc: mails? [was: Re: inconsistent mailgraph settings]G Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2021-08-25 12:50 +0200
Re: BTS not archiving Bcc: mails? [was: Re: inconsistent mailgraph settings] Don Armstrong <don@debian.org> - 2021-08-27 02:10 +0200
Re: BTS not archiving Bcc: mails? [was: Re: inconsistent mailgraph settings] Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2021-08-23 09:30 +0200
Re: inconsistent mailgraph settings Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2021-08-23 02:40 +0200
Re: inconsistent mailgraph settings Tomas Pospisek <tpo2@sourcepole.ch> - 2021-08-23 07:30 +0200
Re: inconsistent mailgraph settings Tomas Pospisek <tpo2@sourcepole.ch> - 2021-08-23 07:40 +0200
csiph-web