Re: Disk for a small server

From	David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.user
Subject	Re: Disk for a small server
Date	2021-08-11 23:50 +0200
Message-ID	<CL4gO-7Kv-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(2 earlier) <CKG4O-9Q-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <CKKrL-358-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <CKMDf-4oI-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <CKTbI-Ni-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <CKX5D-3BP-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On 8/11/21 7:00 AM, Celejar wrote:

> I myself have no personal experience or deep understanding of the 
> issues, but the experts do not accept your position that [non-ECC
> memory combined with operating system storage stack integrity
> checking] is higher risk than [ECC memory combined with operating
> system storage stack integrity checking] due to the possibility of
> the "scrub of death." Here's Jim Salter (from the second link I gave
> above):

Without a thorough review of all the engineering for all of the various 
computer hardware, software, and systems under discussion, definitive 
answers cannot be found through analysis alone.  That leaves opinion. 
"Academics", "experts", "creators", etc., are typically favored, but 
sometimes the nobodies with real-world experience are "right" (to a 
greater or less degree).

That is why there is the scientific method.  Please cite relevant 
article(s) with reproducible laboratory results and/or analysis of 
long-term real-world data regarding failure modes, effects, and hazards 
of non-ECC memory vs. ECC memory when paired with operating systems with 
vs. without storage stack integrity checking and correction.

David

Thread

Disk for a small server Leandro Noferini <lnoferin@cybervalley.org> - 2021-08-10 17:20 +0200
  Re: Disk for a small server ghe2001 <ghe2001@protonmail.com> - 2021-08-10 19:10 +0200
    Re: Disk for a small server Leandro Noferini <leandro@cybervalley.org> - 2021-08-10 20:30 +0200
      Re: Disk for a small server ghe2001 <ghe2001@protonmail.com> - 2021-08-10 20:50 +0200
      Re: Disk for a small server rhkramer@gmail.com - 2021-08-10 21:10 +0200
        Re: Disk for a small server Leandro Noferini <lnoferin@cybervalley.org> - 2021-08-10 21:10 +0200
          Re: Disk for a small server Thomas Amm <debili@open-email.net> - 2021-08-10 22:40 +0200
      Re: Disk for a small server Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside <debian@polynamaude.com> - 2021-08-11 01:00 +0200
        Re: Disk for a small server Leandro Noferini <leandro@cybervalley.org> - 2021-08-11 11:20 +0200
          Re: Disk for a small server Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside <debian@polynamaude.com> - 2021-08-11 12:30 +0200
  Re: Disk for a small server David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2021-08-10 21:50 +0200
    Re: Disk for a small server Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2021-08-10 22:00 +0200
      Re: Disk for a small server David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2021-08-11 02:40 +0200
        Re: Disk for a small server Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2021-08-11 05:00 +0200
          Re: Disk for a small server David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2021-08-11 12:00 +0200
            Re: Memory and other hardware safety issue regarding ZFS [was Disk  for a small server] Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside <debian@polynamaude.com> - 2021-08-11 12:30 +0200
            Re: Disk for a small server Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2021-08-11 16:10 +0200
              Re: Disk for a small server David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2021-08-11 23:50 +0200
                Re: Disk for a small server Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2021-08-12 00:00 +0200
                Re: Disk for a small server <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-08-12 08:50 +0200
    Re: Disk for a small server <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-08-10 22:00 +0200
      Re: Disk for a small server David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2021-08-11 03:00 +0200

csiph-web