Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #240437

Re: This years Coverity scan

From Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: This years Coverity scan
Date 2014-04-26 19:06 -0700
Message-ID <CF81B43F.35CE5%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink)
References <ljh98o$tra$1@dont-email.me> <rYGdnWdV59u4w8HOnZ2dnUVZ_gqdnZ2d@bresnan.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 4/26/14, 6:32 PM, in article
rYGdnWdV59u4w8HOnZ2dnUVZ_gqdnZ2d@bresnan.com, "GreyCloud" <mist@cumulus.com>
wrote:

> On 4/26/2014 3:42 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>> Coverity scan has again published their report about error density.
>> 
>> This time OSS code was in *all* categories better than CSS code (last year
>> it was better in all categories with code below 1.000.000 lines).
>> Tested was NetBSD, FreeBSD, LibreOffice and Linux among other OSS
>> 
>> The result this year was 0.59 per kloc for OSS, 0.72 for CSS
>> 
>> The linux code they scanned ( 8.5 million lines of code) resulted in 0.61
>> per kloc
>> 
>> So far for the repeated claims of "hobby ware" made by some dimbulbs
>> 
>> The code quality of OSS software was *better* acrosss the board compared to
>> CSS code
>> 
> Where is this report?
> 
<http://blog.coverity.com/2014/04/15/hot-presses-coverity-scan-report-2013>


-- 
* Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu:    <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint / LibreOffice:               <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto>
* Win 8 / Word 2013:                <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4>
* Mavericks / Pages 5.1:            <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

This years Coverity scan Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-04-26 23:42 +0200
  Re: This years Coverity scan Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-26 17:24 -0700
  Re: This years Coverity scan GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-04-26 19:32 -0600
    Re: This years Coverity scan Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-26 19:06 -0700
      Errors per line of code ? !  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-04-26 19:23 -0700
        Re: Errors per line of code ? ! Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-04-26 20:25 -0700
          @snit should publish his monthly rate.  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-04-26 21:34 -0700
            Re: @snit should publish his monthly rate.  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-26 21:40 -0700
              @snit should publish his monthly rate.  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-04-26 22:27 -0700
                Re: @snit should publish his monthly rate.  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-26 23:16 -0700
                @snit is bat·shit crazy.  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-04-27 00:51 -0700
                Re: @snit is bat·shit crazy.  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-27 09:20 -0700
            Re: @snit should publish his monthly rate. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-04-27 11:09 -0700
  Re: This years Coverity scan Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-04-27 11:00 -0400
    Re: This years Coverity scan 	flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-04-27 11:38 -0400
      Re: This years Coverity scan Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-04-27 12:41 -0400
        Re: This years Coverity scan GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-04-27 11:20 -0600
          Re: This years Coverity scan Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-04-27 15:13 -0400
    Re: This years Coverity scan Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-27 09:31 -0700
  Re: This years Coverity scan DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-04-28 19:30 -0400
    Re: This years Coverity scan Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-04-29 01:42 +0200
      Re: This years Coverity scan Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-04-28 20:09 -0400
        Re: This years Coverity scan DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-04-29 19:50 -0400
      Re: This years Coverity scan William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2014-04-29 09:18 +0100
      Re: This years Coverity scan chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-04-29 07:00 -0500
        Re: This years Coverity scan 	flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-04-29 08:13 -0400
          Re: This years Coverity scan Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-04-29 14:32 +0200

csiph-web