Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #240417
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: Apple has more record earnings |
| Date | 2014-04-26 17:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <CF819CC9.35CBE%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <OKQ6v.138546$cz2.53687@fx08.iad> <chine.bleu-EEA769.13122726042014@news.eternal-september.org> <d7W6v.102731$%x6.13178@fx16.iad> <bs2qneF227nU1@mid.individual.net> <ljhdpn$q3q$2@dont-email.me> |
On 4/26/14, 4:00 PM, in article ljhdpn$q3q$2@dont-email.me, "Peter Köhlmann"
<peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
> Lloyd E Parsons wrote:
>
>>> It's not simply matter of a minimum price Apple must meet. It's
>>> selling me hardware for the same price I can buy from other vendors,
>>> and it's being able to run software without "BootCamp" or any other
>>> kludge, and not being locked into Apple's "walled garden."
>>>
>>> The fact I can only run OS X on Apple branded computers also loses me
>>> as a customer. I'm not getting locked into that. I've seen the way
>>> Apple axes hardware without warning. Xserve anybody?
>>
>> Good glad to see you're not an potential Apple customer. So now take
>> your bitching about things you care little about and toddle on down the
>> road.
>>
>
> You are aware that this is a linux group and not one for wankers, are you?
> If someone is wrong here, it is imbeciles like Snit Michael Glasser and you
>
When you are in a discussion and someone is wrong, it is generally you.
Here, just a small sampling of your absurd claims:
---------------------------------------------------------------
<https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=332544> Christoph Feck
-----
The tab widget is provided by the Qt library. Please report this
issue directly to Qt developers via
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/
-----
<https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-37812>
-----
Priority: P3: Somewhat important
Status: Open Open
Resolution: Unresolved
Fix Version/s: Some future release
-----
Peter Köhlmann:
-----
That stupid clown Snit Michael Glasser has not the tiniest of
clues who is to address with that "bug" ... It isn't a Qt widget
that incompetent "computer expert" is complaining about, it is a
KDE widget
-----
Peter Köhlmann claims Christoph Feck of the KDE team says things which prove
he is "incompetent" and "has not the tiniest of clues who to address with
that 'bug'".
Message ID: <ljb27t$vfe$1@dont-email.me>
<http://goo.gl/s0Jr4U>
---------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Köhlmann, referencing his own idiotic quotes:
-----
And what a surprise: Not a single Msg-ID supplied by that liar
Snit... Because *if* he did supply Msg-IDs, anyone could see that
he has doctored the posts. ... He would be shown as the imbecile
liar he really is
-----
Peter distances himself from his own statements saying a msg-ID is
needed to prove he is an idiot. Done, with links. What excuse will he
make next? A claim to kill filter me so he can pretend to not see this
list is my guess!
Message-ID: <l9af1k$7ov$1@dont-email.me>
<http://goo.gl/miEeYd>
---------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Köhlmann:
-----
Except there are no "700 duplicative Linux distributions"
It is (at most) about a dozen. The rest is special purpose, and
not for the general usage on the desktop.
-----
From <http://distrowatch.com>: "The bewildering choice and the ever
increasing number of Linux distributions can be confusing for those who are
new to Linux."
Message-ID: <jq7pqj$ro7$1@dont-email.me>
<http://goo.gl/7mTTJw>
---------------------------------------------------------------
Snit:
-----
Excellent screencasting software, similar to ScreenFlow. And
example of something I find key to its use:
<http://youtu.be/To4v70huwAU>. What OSS tool on desktop Linux
has anything even close?
-----
Peter Köhlmann:
-----
There are several more. Look up "Istanbul" for example or
"Byzanz", or "Cankiri" The list can grow quite a bit, but
these are the most used ones
-----
No program Peter pointed to does the task shown in the video. Peter
never found *any* way on desktop Linux.
Message-ID: <jkpf9p$545$1@dont-email.me>
<http://goo.gl/cLC0Mo>
---------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Köhlmann:
-----
In fact, there are at least 3 programs for screencasting which do
either without exception *all* he "needs" or can do it combined
with others
-----
| You have spoken of three programs.
No, I have not. Your incredibly bad reading comprehension is
rearing its ugly head again,
-----
Both of those quotes come from the same day and the same thread and were
stated in that order. In another thread on a previous day Peter gave the
names of three screen recording programs: Istanbul, Byzanz, and Cankiri
Message ID: <l9scpl$fig$1@dont-email.me>
<http://goo.gl/Q85TGT>
Message ID: <l9spoa$5qn$2@dont-email.me>
<http://goo.gl/o6vJcb>
Message-ID: <jkpf9p$545$1@dont-email.me>
<http://goo.gl/cLC0Mo>
---------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Köhlmann:
-----
When I talked about Hangout, that was obviously to anyone with a
brain that it is a mobile app, a class of programs which will be
more and more important
-----
<http://www.google.com/hangouts>
-----
Android Devices; iPhone, iPad & iPod; Computers; Gmail; Google+
-----
Hmmmm, who is right about Google Hangout: Peter or Google? LOL!
Message-ID: <l9n635$aga$2@dont-email.me>
<http://goo.gl/t76po2>
---------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Köhlmann:
-----
| For example, if I modified a BSD variant and tried to pass it
| off as "Linux" to people I would be stopped. ...
BSD allows such sheenigans
-----
The BSD license has no power to override trademarks and "allow" this.
Message-ID: <l98q2g$nj1$1@dont-email.me>
<http://goo.gl/zvo4fv>
---------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Kühlmann:
-----
| I was specifically in reference to "Nobody" and his incorrect
| claim in reference to the Linux code that "Users can do anything
| they want with it." This simply is not true.
It *is* true. Users *can* do anything they want to with it.
-----
Peter did also admit "they have to supply the source too if they want
to distribute the code". He never acknowledged his completely
contradictory claim was wrong.
Message-ID: <l96ad6$t5b$1@dont-email.me>
<http://goo.gl/IDdPqT>
---------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Köhlmann:
-----
| [Shortcuts and symbolic links] are similar in usage...
They are not even remotely "similar". Neither in usage nor in
behaviour. If you had /any/ clue whatsoever you would know that.
-----
It is not as if they are the same, but they clearly share many
similarities. Peter does not even know the basics on this topic.
Message-ID: <l97mn6$mpb$1@dont-email.me>
<http://goo.gl/0UHbhj>
---------------------------------------------------------------
-----
| So when I saw a sign that spoke of a "bibliothèque" I figured it
| had to do with books ("biblio") and could guess with pretty
| strong certainty it was a library. Similarly things like
| "hôpital" meaning "hospital" and "métro" referring to the subway
| system are not hard to figure out.
Which does not help you a tiny little bit if you *hear* the
language ...
-----
When people *read* signs they need not *hear* them! Peter never
acknowledged his error and made accusations of dishonesty.
Message-ID: <l92i71$s3j$1@dont-email.me>
<http://goo.gl/eAm0cC>
---------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Köhlmann, after being shown these videos:
<http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/PrintFirstTime.mp4>
<http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/FirstScan.mov>
Both show an OfficeJet Pro 8600 after being connected to a network and
being used for the first time on a Mac. And it works very, very well.
-----
Scanning [on OS X] is not supported *at* *all* without jumping
through several hoops. This includes hunting down 3 different
software packages (libusb, sane-backend and sane) *and* installing
them. Out of the box no scanning is supported at all. This is in
stark contrast to linux where scanning is supported right from the
start after setting up the printer
The same is true about *all* OfficeJet Pro printers under OSX.
-----
LOL! Yes, after being shown how an OfficeJet Pro works without doing
*anything* extra Peter still makes these completely incorrect claims.
Message-ID: <l31oss$9o6$1@dont-email.me>
<http://goo.gl/600BHt>
---------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Köhlmann
-----
| When you launch it, the splash screen says 'gimp'
Nope.
------
Peter is wrong, and it is trivial to prove:
<http://www.gimp.org/about/splash/stable.html>.
Message-ID: <jmmvqr$efo$1@dont-email.me>
<http://goo.gl/rGhbir>
---------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Köhlmann:
-----
The apps with "Quit" do *not* exit, they continue to run
in the background
-----
Had he known how to use "top" he would know he was wrong:
<http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/top.mov>
Message-ID: <gq8oo1$u4v$03$1@news.t-online.com>
<http://goo.gl/CcTIAO>
---------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Köhlmann, in reference to <http://goo.gl/IjlkV>:
-----
You both show just *again* your incredible cluelessness. That is
*standard* X behaviour, you cretins. That Snot Michael Glasser
knows *nothing* about that is normal, he is the worst "IT teacher"
of all time. He knows nothing usefull about computing.
-----
The video, of course, shows things other than just standard X
behavior. Peter never showed any understanding of this.
Message-Id: <4985cb95$0$32676$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
<http://goo.gl/0R2qow>
---------------------------------------------------------------
In reference to: <http://goo.gl/gBV6G> / <http://goo.gl/nysWd>
Peter Köhlmann:
-----
| What's to understand? I can't read, write, copy or
| delete a root-owned folder... but I can rename it.
Actually, no, you can't
And stop lying. I have tested it.
-----
You have to tamper with the permissions to have it different. And
for that reason DFS claims are simply bullshit.
-----
I can't duplicate the "problem" on any machine here.
-----
Since "Lost+found" is not created with the sticky bit at all, it
should not exhibit the behaviour DFS claims. And I can do whatever
I want with it on my systems (on all of them), it certainly does
not behave in any way near that way claimed
-----
Peter never admitted to his error.
Message-ID: <ik9hu6$7li$02$1@news.t-online.com>
<http://goo.gl/LbeLp9>
Message-ID: <ikaflj$1us$02$1@news.t-online.com>
<http://goo.gl/PyNcnz>
Message-ID: <ike3nf$2u2$02$1@news.t-online.com>
<http://goo.gl/iQiekd>
Message-ID: <ikbtti$e6r$02$1@news.t-online.com>
<http://goo.gl/P91njl>
---------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Köhlmann, speaking of HTML5:
-----
And browsers on desktop computers have little, if any, need to
adhere to such a "standard" which has no real reason to exist
except to support the idiotic iDevices
-----
Yeah, HTML5 has no other reason to exist. LOL!
Message-ID: <ijbl4c$2se$01$1@news.t-online.com>
<http://goo.gl/agjo2B>
---------------------------------------------------------------
<http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4683>
-----
Clicking OK will restart the volume, even if no settings were
changed. Changing this setting does not require the volume to
be reinitialized; data is preserved.
-----
Peter Köhlmann:
-----
So You call having to reformat a drive in order to have that
feature "choice"? Really?
-----
Peter thinks "restarting" a volume reformats it even though it is
specifically stated no reinitialization is done and data is preserved.
Message-ID: <jok7e8$e7k$1@dont-email.me>
<http://goo.gl/RtL82B>
---------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Köhlmann, in reference to the term "DHCP network", which
is used by Oracle, the University of Illinois, DATAQ, Netgear,
Cisco, and other such groups, <http://goo.gl/C1TpPO>:
-----
No, it is technically bullshit. Nobody wanting to be taken
seriously as being competent would *ever* use such an idiotic
description.
-----
So, to Peter, *none* of those groups should be seen as being competent
when it comes to networking. None of them. LOL!
Message-ID: <jr35kp$bif$1@dont-email.me>
<http://goo.gl/kf6zYv>
---------------------------------------------------------------
Snit, titling a thread where he made a mistake:
-----
Skype done.... *I* screwed up
-----
Peter Köhlman, referencing the same mistake:
-----
Snot Glasser will claim the most idiotic bullshit to wiggle out
of the fact that he screwed up again
-----
LOL! Just brilliant of Peter... and he never admitted to his mistake.
Message-ID: <k1dtul$vhd$1@dont-email.me>
<http://goo.gl/j3eShO>
---------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Köhlmann:
-----
Play Services do *not* run in the background. The Update services
it provides *are* controllable by the user
-----
<https://developer.android.com/google/play-services>
-----
The Google Play services APK contains the individual Google
services and runs as a background service in the Android OS. You
interact with the background service through the client library
and the service carries out the actions on your behalf.
...
Automatic Updates
Devices running Android 2.2 and newer and that have the Google
Play Store app automatically receive updates to Google Play
services.
-----
Hmmm, who to believe about Google Play... Peter or Google. So hard to
decide!
Message-ID: <la6leg$rh1$1@dont-email.me>
<http://goo.gl/bg9e6e>
---------------------------------------------------------------
--
* Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint / LibreOffice: <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto>
* Win 8 / Word 2013: <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4>
* Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Apple has more record earnings Jimmy Neutron <nobody@beta.jpunix.net> - 2014-04-24 09:01 -0400
Re: Apple has more record earnings Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-04-24 09:14 -0400
Re: Apple has more record earnings Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-24 08:31 -0700
Re: Apple has more record earnings Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2014-04-25 19:42 -0500
Re: Apple has more record earnings flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-04-25 20:45 -0400
Re: Apple has more record earnings Siri Crews <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2014-04-25 17:48 -0700
Re: Apple has more record earnings Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-25 18:02 -0700
Re: Apple has more record earnings Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2014-04-26 00:42 -0500
Re: Apple has more record earnings Siri Crews <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2014-04-25 22:56 -0700
Re: Apple has more record earnings Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2014-04-26 01:11 -0500
Re: Apple has more record earnings Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2014-04-26 11:00 -0500
Re: Apple has more record earnings Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-26 09:49 -0700
Re: Apple has more record earnings Sinister Midget <fardblossom@gmail.com> - 2014-04-26 20:09 +0000
Re: Apple has more record earnings Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-26 13:17 -0700
Re: Apple has more record earnings Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-04-26 15:38 -0500
Re: Apple has more record earnings Siri Crews <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2014-04-26 13:12 -0700
Re: Apple has more record earnings Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-26 13:16 -0700
Re: Apple has more record earnings Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-04-26 16:26 -0400
Re: Apple has more record earnings Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-04-26 15:39 -0500
Re: Apple has more record earnings Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-04-26 17:50 -0400
Re: Apple has more record earnings Siri Crews <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2014-04-26 13:58 -0700
Re: Apple has more record earnings Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-04-26 17:52 -0400
Re: Apple has more record earnings Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-04-26 23:59 +0200
Re: Apple has more record earnings Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-04-27 01:01 +0200
Re: Apple has more record earnings Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-04-26 21:19 -0400
Re: Apple has more record earnings chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-04-28 07:34 -0500
Re: Apple has more record earnings GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-04-26 19:19 -0600
Re: Apple has more record earnings Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2014-04-26 17:11 -0500
Re: Apple has more record earnings Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2014-04-26 17:07 -0500
Re: Apple has more record earnings Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-04-26 17:36 -0500
Re: Apple has more record earnings Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-04-27 01:00 +0200
Re: Apple has more record earnings Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-26 17:26 -0700
Re: Apple has more record earnings Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2014-04-26 19:44 -0500
Re: Apple has more record earnings Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-26 18:06 -0700
Re: Apple has more record earnings William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2014-04-27 09:52 +0100
Re: Apple has more record earnings Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-04-26 21:20 -0400
Re: Apple has more record earnings Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-26 18:26 -0700
Re: Apple has more record earnings "Cola Zealot" <Cola_Zealot@fuckoff.com> - 2014-04-27 22:21 +0200
Re: Apple has more record earnings Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-27 13:23 -0700
Re: Apple has more record earnings Siri Crews <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2014-04-26 16:00 -0700
Re: Apple has more record earnings Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2014-04-26 19:29 -0500
Re: Apple has more record earnings Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-26 17:43 -0700
Re: Apple has more record earnings -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2014-04-27 18:45 -0700
Re: Apple has more record earnings Richard Starkey <nobody@ringo.jpunix.net> - 2014-04-26 02:44 -0400
Re: Apple has more record earnings Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2014-04-26 08:15 -0500
Re: Apple has more record earnings William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2014-04-26 14:21 +0100
Re: Apple has more record earnings Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2014-04-26 10:24 -0500
Re: Apple has more record earnings Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-26 09:50 -0700
Re: Apple has more record earnings Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-26 09:47 -0700
Re: Apple has more record earnings Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-04-26 13:11 -0400
Re: Apple has more record earnings Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-26 10:24 -0700
Re: Apple has more record earnings Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-04-26 23:53 +0200
Re: Apple has more record earnings Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-04-27 00:07 +0200
Re: Apple has more record earnings Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-04-26 17:35 -0500
Re: Apple has more record earnings Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-04-27 00:57 +0200
Re: Apple has more record earnings Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2014-04-26 19:56 -0500
Re: Apple has more record earnings Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-26 18:06 -0700
Re: Apple has more record earnings RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-04-27 01:24 +0000
Re: Apple has more record earnings Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-26 18:26 -0700
Re: Apple has more record earnings Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-04-26 21:27 -0400
Re: Apple has more record earnings Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-26 18:37 -0700
To get -your- job done, buy a PC. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-04-26 19:07 -0700
Re: To get -your- job done, buy a PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-26 19:11 -0700
Re: To get -your- job done, buy a PC. Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-04-26 20:26 -0700
Re: Apple has more record earnings Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-04-27 11:19 -0400
Re: Apple has more record earnings Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-04-27 17:46 +0200
Re: Apple has more record earnings Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-27 09:30 -0700
Re: Apple has more record earnings Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-04-27 12:46 -0400
Re: Apple has more record earnings Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-04-27 13:39 -0500
Re: Apple has more record earnings "Cola Zealot" <Cola_Zealot@fuckoff.com> - 2014-04-27 22:30 +0200
Re: Apple has more record earnings Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-27 13:35 -0700
Re: Apple has more record earnings Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-04-27 14:41 -0700
Re: Apple has more record earnings Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-04-28 15:51 +0200
Re: Apple has more record earnings Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-04-28 16:00 +0200
Re: Apple has more record earnings Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-04-28 12:20 -0400
Re: Apple has more record earnings GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-04-28 11:21 -0600
Re: Apple has more record earnings Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-04-28 13:33 -0400
Re: Apple has more record earnings GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-04-28 12:08 -0600
Re: Apple has more record earnings Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-04-28 21:03 +0200
Re: Apple has more record earnings GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-04-28 13:27 -0600
Re: Apple has more record earnings Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-04-28 17:35 -0400
Re: Apple has more record earnings Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-28 14:49 -0700
Re: Apple has more record earnings Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-04-28 23:53 +0200
Re: Apple has more record earnings Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-04-28 18:11 -0400
Re: Apple has more record earnings Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-04-28 17:28 -0400
Re: Apple has more record earnings William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2014-04-28 22:47 +0100
Re: Apple has more record earnings Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-04-28 18:04 -0400
Re: Apple has more record earnings Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-04-27 13:37 -0500
Re: Apple has more record earnings Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-27 12:33 -0700
Re: Apple has more record earnings DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-04-27 19:39 -0400
Re: Apple has more record earnings Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-04-28 09:14 +0200
Re: Apple has more record earnings Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-04-28 05:46 -0400
Re: Apple has more record earnings -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2014-04-28 03:37 -0700
Re: Apple has more record earnings Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-04-28 13:00 +0200
Re: Apple has more record earnings DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-04-28 08:22 -0400
Re: Apple has more record earnings Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-04-28 14:37 +0200
Re: Apple has more record earnings -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2014-04-28 09:25 -0700
Re: Apple has more record earnings DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-04-28 08:22 -0400
Re: Apple has more record earnings JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-04-28 13:00 -0500
Re: Apple has more record earnings -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2014-04-28 12:08 -0700
Re: Apple has more record earnings Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2014-04-28 18:05 -0500
Re: Apple has more record earnings Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-04-28 19:42 -0400
Re: Apple has more record earnings Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-28 16:52 -0700
Re: Apple has more record earnings Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-04-28 15:49 +0200
Re: Apple has more record earnings Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-04-28 12:11 -0400
Re: Apple has more record earnings GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-04-28 11:26 -0600
Re: Apple has more record earnings Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-04-28 13:37 -0400
Re: Apple has more record earnings -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2014-04-28 10:58 -0700
Re: Apple has more record earnings Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-04-28 17:19 -0400
Re: Apple has more record earnings Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-28 14:31 -0700
Re: Apple has more record earnings GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-04-28 16:14 -0600
Re: Apple has more record earnings Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-04-28 18:28 -0400
Re: Apple has more record earnings Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-04-29 00:37 +0200
Re: Apple has more record earnings Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-04-28 18:44 -0400
Re: Apple has more record earnings Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-04-29 01:09 +0200
Re: Apple has more record earnings Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-04-28 19:52 -0400
Re: Apple has more record earnings Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-04-29 00:26 +0200
Re: Apple has more record earnings chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-04-29 06:54 -0500
Re: Apple has more record earnings GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-04-28 12:11 -0600
Re: Apple has more record earnings Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-04-28 17:32 -0400
Re: Apple has more record earnings Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-28 12:52 -0700
Re: Apple has more record earnings -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2014-04-28 14:05 -0700
Re: Apple has more record earnings GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-04-28 15:11 -0600
Re: Apple has more record earnings Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-28 12:51 -0700
Re: Apple has more record earnings -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2014-04-27 18:56 -0700
Re: Apple has more record earnings Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-27 20:40 -0700
Re: Apple has more record earnings Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-04-28 08:51 -0400
Re: Apple has more record earnings Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-26 17:31 -0700
Re: Apple has more record earnings Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-04-27 11:13 -0400
Re: Apple has more record earnings Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-27 09:29 -0700
Re: Apple has more record earnings Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-26 17:33 -0700
Re: Apple has more record earnings Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-04-27 11:06 -0400
Re: Apple has more record earnings Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-27 09:24 -0700
Re: Apple has more record earnings Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-04-27 13:41 -0500
Re: Apple has more record earnings Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-27 12:33 -0700
Re: Apple has more record earnings chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-04-28 07:59 -0500
Re: Apple has more record earnings Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-26 09:50 -0700
Re: Apple has more record earnings Jack Ryan <mixmaster@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2014-04-26 04:12 -0500
csiph-web