Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #240041
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" |
| Date | 2014-04-24 17:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <CF7EF4D8.35A36%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink) |
| References | (11 earlier) <UpSdnZtAL6m4cMvOnZ2dnUVZ_sadnZ2d@bresnan.com> <ljbmhj$jkc$1@dont-email.me> <ljbmqf$lhd$1@dont-email.me> <ljbsl1$r8$1@dont-email.me> <ljbti0$7ke$1@dont-email.me> |
On 4/24/14, 1:52 PM, in article ljbti0$7ke$1@dont-email.me, "Peter Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: > Lusotec wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >> Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>> Lusotec wrote: >>>> GreyCloud wrote: >>>>> From another group a fellow did say that UNIX doesn't allow for more >>>>> than 2 rings... how that is I don't know. >>>>> And I'm not sure if Linux falls into that same category. >>>> >>>> I have only read some parts of the UNIX specs, so I may be wrong, but I >>>> would bet UNIX specs make no mention of rings (or similar) at all. >>> >>> They do, even if they don't call them "rings" >>> All Unixes have a priviledged processor mode and a "user" mode. >>> Without, it gets tricky to impossible to bring real security into the OS. >> >> After a quick search of the UNIX specs v4, the specs mention "kernel >> mode/space" and "user mode/space" but they are (purposely) very vague on >> what they mean and, > > Right, as those can be achieved differently with hardware > But they need to be distinctive. This isn't possible with software alone > >> for example, consider that the "distinction between a >> 'system call' and a 'library routine' is an implementation detail". > > Rightly so, as both are present on any given unix system > > < snip > > >> </quote> >> file:///home/artur/tmp/susv4tc1/xrat/V4_xbd_chap03.html >> >> <quote> >> Filenames are sequences of bytes, not sequences of characters. The only >> bytes that this standard says cannot appear in any filename are the slash >> byte and the null byte. > > This is one of the main differences between unix/linux and windows. > Unix treats almost no character (except those 2) as illegal in filenames, > whereas windows has several characters which may not appear there, in > addition several filenames are reserved > A much bigger issue than the stupid case-sensitivity idiocy put forward by > the imbecile Snit Michael Glasser > And you lash out because of your humiliation. So be it. -- * Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint / LibreOffice: <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto> * Win 8 / Word 2013: <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-04-21 15:16 -0400
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-21 12:27 -0700
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-04-21 16:05 -0400
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-04-21 14:42 -0600
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-04-21 14:15 -0700
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-04-21 18:26 -0600
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-21 17:57 -0700
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" "Poisoned by Win 8.1" <trigonometry1972@gmail.com> - 2014-04-21 19:30 -0700
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-04-21 23:11 -0400
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-04-22 12:27 -0400
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2014-04-22 11:25 +0200
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-04-22 09:20 -0400
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-04-22 12:37 -0400
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-04-22 11:12 -0600
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-04-22 19:40 +0200
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" Lusotec <nomail@nomail.not> - 2014-04-22 19:41 +0100
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-04-22 13:09 -0600
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" Lusotec <nomail@nomail.not> - 2014-04-22 21:58 +0100
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-04-22 15:14 -0600
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" Lusotec <nomail@nomail.not> - 2014-04-23 00:03 +0100
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-04-22 18:19 -0600
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" Lusotec <nomail@nomail.not> - 2014-04-24 19:03 +0100
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-04-24 15:28 -0600
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-04-22 18:42 -0600
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-04-23 09:08 +0200
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-04-23 08:48 -0600
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" Lusotec <nomail@nomail.not> - 2014-04-24 19:46 +0100
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-04-24 21:05 +0200
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-04-22 14:11 -0500
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-22 12:34 -0700
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.invalid> - 2014-04-22 21:46 +0200
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-22 12:55 -0700
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-04-22 14:12 -0600
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-04-22 13:08 -0600
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-04-22 21:46 +0200
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-04-22 14:16 -0600
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-04-22 22:29 +0200
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-04-22 15:20 -0600
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-04-22 23:32 +0200
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-04-22 23:52 +0200
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-04-22 16:28 -0600
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.invalid> - 2014-04-23 00:44 +0200
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-04-22 18:21 -0600
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.invalid> - 2014-04-23 04:00 +0200
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-04-22 21:52 -0600
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-04-23 06:25 +0200
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-04-23 08:51 -0600
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" Lusotec <nomail@nomail.not> - 2014-04-24 19:52 +0100
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-04-24 20:57 +0200
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" Lusotec <nomail@nomail.not> - 2014-04-24 21:36 +0100
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-04-24 22:52 +0200
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-24 17:05 -0700
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-04-25 06:48 -0500
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-04-25 07:03 -0500
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-04-25 08:51 -0400
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-04-25 09:20 -0400
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-04-25 11:13 -0400
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-04-25 11:20 -0400
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-04-25 11:40 -0600
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-04-25 14:21 -0400
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-04-25 12:57 -0600
Is it hard to change xterm's font ? Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-04-25 16:50 -0700
Re: Is it hard to change xterm's font ? Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-04-25 21:19 -0400
Re: Is it hard to change xterm's font ? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-04-27 17:45 -0400
Re: Is it hard to change xterm's font ? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-04-28 15:53 +0200
Re: Is it hard to change xterm's font ? TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2014-05-01 23:06 +0000
Re: Is it hard to change xterm's font ? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-01 19:55 -0400
Re: Is it hard to change xterm's font ? flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-02 07:46 -0400
Re: Is it hard to change xterm's font ? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-02 15:03 +0200
Re: Is it hard to change xterm's font ? flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-02 09:21 -0400
Re: Is it hard to change xterm's font ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-02 11:22 -0700
Re: Is it hard to change xterm's font ? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-02 13:00 -0400
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-04-24 15:32 -0600
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-04-22 23:07 +0200
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-04-22 15:24 -0600
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-04-22 23:34 +0200
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-04-22 16:33 -0600
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" Lusotec <nomail@nomail.not> - 2014-04-23 00:32 +0100
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-04-22 18:23 -0600
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-04-22 20:15 -0400
Re: Marti van Lin: "Ubuntu 14.04 LTS will be rock solid" GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-04-22 21:53 -0600
csiph-web