Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.project > #12329
| From | Timo Röhling <timo@gaussglocke.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.project |
| Subject | Re: DEP-16 Confidential votes |
| Date | 2021-04-18 23:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <C5mQ2-4Ye-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <C3zRo-3H2-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <C3AaK-3QQ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <C3RbA-6rI-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <C4zcC-z8-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
* Stéphane Glondu <glondu@debian.org> [2021-04-16 17:12]: >I would be glad to help :-) Great! >> With all that being said and having made my case, I am open for any >> reasonably secure solution (including Belenios) that we can agree on, >> and I will help implement it if I can. >And I am open to make changes in Belenios if needed. I'd like to raise two questions for debate: 1. Do we want to retain the ability to vote openly? Obviously, open votes are more transparent, which is nice and very appropriate for many technical issues that we might vote on. On the other hand, most votes in Debian are DPL elections anyway. 2. How much are we committed to the current process that works exclusively via email? Personally, I think that a structured HTML form is more accessible for screen readers than pure text ballots, and you can still make the web interface render nicely in a text browser such as Lynx or w3m. On the other hand, some people might have considerably less trust in their web browser than their email client. Cheers Timo -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ╭────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ │ Timo Röhling │ ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ │ 9B03 EBB9 8300 DF97 C2B1 23BF CC8C 6BDD 1403 F4CA │ ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ ╰────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯
Back to linux.debian.project | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
DEP-16 Confidential votes Timo Röhling <timo@gaussglocke.de> - 2021-04-13 11:10 +0200
Re: DEP-16 Confidential votes Pierre-Elliott Bécue <peb@debian.org> - 2021-04-13 11:30 +0200
Re: DEP-16 Confidential votes Timo Röhling <timo@gaussglocke.de> - 2021-04-13 11:50 +0200
Re: DEP-16 Confidential votes Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2021-04-13 15:40 +0200
Re: DEP-16 Confidential votes Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2021-04-13 18:20 +0200
Re: Re: DEP-16 Confidential votes Timo Röhling <timo@gaussglocke.de> - 2021-04-14 00:40 +0200
Re: DEP-16 Confidential votes Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2021-04-14 01:00 +0200
Re: DEP-16 Confidential votes Pierre-Elliott Bécue <peb@debian.org> - 2021-04-14 18:50 +0200
Re: DEP-16 Confidential votes Timo Röhling <timo@gaussglocke.de> - 2021-04-14 21:00 +0200
Re: DEP-16 Confidential votes Timo Röhling <timo@gaussglocke.de> - 2021-04-14 19:10 +0200
Re: DEP-16 Confidential votes Stéphane Glondu <glondu@debian.org> - 2021-04-16 18:10 +0200
Re: DEP-16 Confidential votes Timo Röhling <timo@gaussglocke.de> - 2021-04-18 23:10 +0200
Re: DEP-16 Confidential votes "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2021-04-18 23:50 +0200
Re: DEP-16 Confidential votes Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> - 2021-04-19 00:40 +0200
Re: DEP-16 Confidential votes Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2021-04-19 00:20 +0200
Re: DEP-16 Confidential votes Olek Wojnar <olek@debian.org> - 2021-04-19 07:00 +0200
Re: DEP-16 Confidential votes Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> - 2021-04-19 09:10 +0200
Re: DEP-16 Confidential votes Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2021-04-19 14:50 +0200
Re: DEP-16 Confidential votes Olek Wojnar <olek@debian.org> - 2021-04-19 19:20 +0200
Re: DEP-16 Confidential votes Olek Wojnar <olek@debian.org> - 2021-04-19 07:00 +0200
Re: DEP-16 Confidential votes Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2021-04-19 14:50 +0200
Re: DEP-16 Confidential votes Sam Hartman <hartmans@suchdamage.org> - 2021-04-19 15:20 +0200
Re: DEP-16 Confidential votes Timo Röhling <timo@gaussglocke.de> - 2021-04-19 16:40 +0200
csiph-web