Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.project > #12281
| From | Eldon Koyle <ekoyle@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.project |
| Subject | Re: Abusive language on Debian lists |
| Date | 2021-04-11 21:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <C2NMJ-57K-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <C29Z0-5xS-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <C2gH8-1m6-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <C2Du1-7r6-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <C2NMJ-57K-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Preface: Some people may consider it petty to care about this. I am not trying to be petty. I honestly feel sad and hurt every time I see this language on these lists. The language over the last few weeks has me feeling sick inside. I'll admit that I'm likely in a small minority here, but I do not believe that I am the only person who feels this way. On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 4:08 AM Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> wrote: > > >>>>> "Eldon" == Eldon Koyle <ekoyle@gmail.com> writes: > > Eldon> Thank you for your thoughtful reply. > > Eldon> I think I did a bad job of explaining. I'm talking about > Eldon> English words that universally accepted as swearing. I have > Eldon> not seen this class of words used constructively in lists, > Eldon> and they are already forbidden. > > I'd be against that. > I think the blanket prohibition of profanity in the list code of > conduct is outdated and harmful. > Does the belief that a rule is harmful somehow nullify the rule? Does the belief that a rule is outdated give you license to disregard it? I cannot accept either of these points. If you think the rule needs updated, you should go through proper channels to try to update it rather than simply disregard it. <snip> > But I think a blanket prohibition would be harmful: > > * Sometimes you are quoting others or quoting something with artistic or > literary value. I have not seen much of this, however as a counterpoint: the FCC is not a tolerant organization. People have subscribed to these lists using packet radio. The language in your last reply was such that the FCC would absolutely take official action against anyone who _received_ it (if it came to their attention, that is). I hope nobody is doing this anymore, but it makes me sad that we are unwilling to support people doing interesting things in a Debian context. > * Tone policing is a thing. <snip> If I understand the argument against tone policing correctly, it is that focusing on the language/tone within the discussion detracts from the main point of the message. If the message were sent back for revision before it was posted to the list, I think that would actually be a net win as it reduces the chance of tone policing on the list -- especially where it would be done by a machine with no emotion involved. I think the project at large would have been better off if all of the recent messages with profanity had been kicked back for revision. > * Sometimes profanity directed at a situation really does let you get > off a little steam. <snip> Getting off steam often leads to escalation. Also, these lists have a lot of members. Does an individual's desire for catharsis outweigh the wish of multiple people to keep the language on the list free of profanity? I apologize to anyone who feels I am wasting their time with this, and I will try not to drag it out any more. -- Eldon
Back to linux.debian.project | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Abusive language on Debian lists Eldon Koyle <ekoyle@gmail.com> - 2021-04-10 02:50 +0200
Re: Abusive language on Debian lists "Thaddeus H. Black" <thb@debian.org> - 2021-04-10 03:50 +0200
Re: Abusive language on Debian lists <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-04-10 10:00 +0200
Re: Abusive language on Debian lists Eldon Koyle <ekoyle@gmail.com> - 2021-04-11 10:20 +0200
Re: Abusive language on Debian lists Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2021-04-11 11:10 +0200
Re: Abusive language on Debian lists <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-04-11 12:00 +0200
Re: Abusive language on Debian lists Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de> - 2021-04-11 12:30 +0200
NVC or other Training at DebConf Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2021-04-11 13:00 +0200
Re: NVC or other Training at DebConf Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de> - 2021-04-11 13:20 +0200
Re: Abusive language on Debian lists <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-04-11 13:00 +0200
Re: Abusive language on Debian lists Bernd Zeimetz <bernd@bzed.de> - 2021-04-12 00:40 +0200
Re: Abusive language on Debian lists Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2021-04-11 12:30 +0200
Re: Abusive language on Debian lists <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-04-11 13:00 +0200
Re: Abusive language on Debian lists Don Armstrong <don@debian.org> - 2021-04-16 23:20 +0200
Re: Abusive language on Debian lists Eldon Koyle <ekoyle@gmail.com> - 2021-04-17 05:40 +0200
Re: Abusive language on Debian lists Eldon Koyle <ekoyle@gmail.com> - 2021-04-11 21:20 +0200
Re: Abusive language on Debian lists <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-04-11 23:00 +0200
Re: Abusive language on Debian lists Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> - 2021-04-10 17:10 +0200
csiph-web