Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #229902
| From | Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Future of X, fvwm and wayland |
| Date | 2020-12-21 18:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <Boxk6-1PX-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <Bob0e-5hL-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <Botgt-7WV-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <BouYW-z5-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <Bovii-Fn-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <Box0K-1Jm-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Stefan Monnier (12020-12-21): > I can't see why it'd need to be around for very long, given that it can > be replaced by Wayland + Xwayland. So Xorg is only useful to the extent > that it supports hardware that Wayland doesn't. Quoting https://wayland.freedesktop.org/docs/html/ch05.html#sect-X11-Application-Support-xwm : # From the X11 point of view, the X window manager (XWM) living inside a # Wayland compositor is just like any other window manager. So no, Xwayland cannot replace X.org: it cannot run window managers, since only one window manager can run, and there's already one hard-coded. For the purpose of this very thread, this is completely unacceptable. Regards, -- Nicolas George
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Future of X, fvwm and wayland Kamil Jońca <kjonca@poczta.onet.pl> - 2020-12-20 18:50 +0100
Re: Future of X, fvwm and wayland Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2020-12-21 14:20 +0100
Re: Future of X, fvwm and wayland Tixy <tixy@yxit.co.uk> - 2020-12-21 16:10 +0100
Re: Future of X, fvwm and wayland Tixy <tixy@yxit.co.uk> - 2020-12-21 16:30 +0100
Re: Future of X, fvwm and wayland Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2020-12-21 18:20 +0100
Re: Future of X, fvwm and wayland Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2020-12-21 18:40 +0100
Re: Future of X, fvwm and wayland Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2020-12-21 19:40 +0100
Re: Future of X, fvwm and wayland Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-12-23 17:40 +0100
Re: Future of X, fvwm and wayland Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@panix.com> - 2020-12-22 02:30 +0100
Re: Future of X, fvwm and wayland Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2020-12-22 14:10 +0100
Re: Future of X, fvwm and wayland Javier Barroso <javibarroso@gmail.com> - 2020-12-22 14:20 +0100
Re: Future of X, fvwm and wayland Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-12-21 18:40 +0100
csiph-web