Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #229388
| From | Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Replying |
| Date | 2020-12-06 14:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <Bj2Ai-2Lh-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <BiJxD-76p-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <BiMYy-1eM-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <BiWbv-729-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <BiYmZ-8uk-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Bj0oP-1ix-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
* 2020-12-06 11:23:06Z, Brad Rogers wrote: > I set a Reply-To for mailing list mails because I *DO NOT WANT* a > private reply. Your treatment of that is completely broken. Credit the > sender with some intelligence, and do as they request. It's not broken; it's perfectly valid and allowed. Reply-To field is message author's suggestion (not a request) where replies be sent. (See RFC 5322 or older 2822.) With Reply-To you certainly can suggest that people send replies to a mailing list or any other place. Other people can treat such suggestions any way they want. None of these are "broken"; they are valid behaviour (as in RFC). I think that I made service to you by telling how Notmuch's "reply to sender" (notmuch reply --reply-to=sender) interprets Reply-To in replies. Maybe some other mail user agents have similar interpretation. That is perfectly valid interpretation and behaviour. This could help you understand why you sometimes get private replies. -- /// Teemu Likonen - .-.. https://www.iki.fi/tlikonen/ // OpenPGP: 4E1055DC84E9DFF613D78557719D69D324539450
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
AMD GPU Sea Islands Problem Guyenne Tsui <guyenne@gmail.com> - 2020-12-05 15:30 +0100
Replying. [was Re: AMD GPU Sea Islands Problem] Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2020-12-05 18:10 +0100
Re: Replying. [was Re: AMD GPU Sea Islands Problem] Kenneth Parker <sea7kenp@gmail.com> - 2020-12-05 18:30 +0100
Re: Replying. [was Re: AMD GPU Sea Islands Problem] Tixy <tixy@yxit.co.uk> - 2020-12-05 19:30 +0100
Re: Replying. [was Re: AMD GPU Sea Islands Problem] Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2020-12-05 20:00 +0100
Re: Replying. [was Re: AMD GPU Sea Islands Problem] Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-12-05 22:10 +0100
Re: Replying. [was Re: AMD GPU Sea Islands Problem] rhkramer@gmail.com - 2020-12-05 23:50 +0100
Re: Replying. [was Re: AMD GPU Sea Islands Problem] Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2020-12-06 08:00 +0100
Re: Replying Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi> - 2020-12-06 10:20 +0100
Re: Replying Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2020-12-06 12:30 +0100
Re: Replying rhkramer@gmail.com - 2020-12-06 13:10 +0100
Re: Replying Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2020-12-06 13:20 +0100
Re: Replying Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi> - 2020-12-06 14:50 +0100
Re: Replying Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2020-12-06 15:40 +0100
Re: Replying Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2020-12-06 16:00 +0100
Re: Replying Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2020-12-06 20:00 +0100
Re: Replying Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi> - 2020-12-06 21:50 +0100
Re: Replying Paul Johnson <baloo@ursamundi.org> - 2020-12-07 15:50 +0100
Re: Replying. [was Re: AMD GPU Sea Islands Problem] Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2020-12-08 21:20 +0100
Re: Replying. [was Re: AMD GPU Sea Islands Problem] Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2020-12-09 01:30 +0100
Re: Replying. [was Re: AMD GPU Sea Islands Problem] Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2020-12-09 01:50 +0100
Re: Replying. [was Re: AMD GPU Sea Islands Problem] Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2020-12-09 02:00 +0100
Re: Replying. [was Re: AMD GPU Sea Islands Problem] Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2020-12-09 02:40 +0100
Re: Replying. [was Re: AMD GPU Sea Islands Problem] Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2020-12-09 09:20 +0100
Re: Replying. [was Re: AMD GPU Sea Islands Problem] Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2020-12-09 19:20 +0100
Re: Replying. [was Re: AMD GPU Sea Islands Problem] Guyenne Tsui <guyenne@gmail.com> - 2020-12-11 21:20 +0100
Re: Replying. [was Re: AMD GPU Sea Islands Problem] Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2020-12-11 22:10 +0100
Re: AMD GPU Sea Islands Problem Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2020-12-05 22:30 +0100
Re: AMD GPU Sea Islands Problem Guyenne Tsui <guyenne@gmail.com> - 2020-12-06 23:20 +0100
Re: AMD GPU Sea Islands Problem Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2020-12-11 23:20 +0100
Re: AMD GPU Sea Islands Problem Guyenne Tsui <guyenne@gmail.com> - 2020-12-12 17:30 +0100
Re: AMD GPU Sea Islands Problem Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-12-12 20:00 +0100
Re: AMD GPU Sea Islands Problem Guyenne Tsui <guyenne@gmail.com> - 2020-12-26 21:40 +0100
Re: AMD GPU Sea Islands Problem "Alexander V. Makartsev" <avbetev@gmail.com> - 2020-12-12 20:40 +0100
Re: AMD GPU Sea Islands Problem Guyenne Tsui <guyenne@gmail.com> - 2020-12-26 21:50 +0100
Re: AMD GPU Sea Islands Problem Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2020-12-13 00:50 +0100
Re: AMD GPU ^H^H^HSea Southern Islands Problem Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2020-12-13 01:00 +0100
csiph-web