Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #229315

Re: Web-bot tarpit aka spider trap (was: swamp rat bots Q)

From Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: Web-bot tarpit aka spider trap (was: swamp rat bots Q)
Date 2020-12-04 17:10 +0100
Message-ID <BilOF-7oP-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <BhWnf-85-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <Bif6y-35a-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <BijWx-6eq-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization none,nada,zip

Show all headers | View raw


On Friday 04 December 2020 09:00:05 Nicolas George wrote:

> hdv@gmail (12020-12-04):
> > Let me offer you an alternative option. (Most) bots work by
> > analysing the referrals on each page in your website. Right? So, why
> > not add a link to a page that normal users will never visit (e.g.
> > because they do not see the link and thus will never click on it),
> > but will show up in a bot's analysis? That way you can monitor your
> > logs for entries containing that page. Every entity requesting that
> > specific URL is blocked.
>
> This made me think of something.
>
> A long time ago, a friend of mine implemented, to trap the
> badly-behaved robots, something called the Book of Infinity: a set of
> deterministic pseud-random pages linking to sub-pages ad infinitum,
> with ever growing URLs.
>
> As it happened, it was not actually a good idea, and released a lot of
> CO₂, and the very badly behaved robots had to be blacklisted from
> explring it. (At some point, we had the same problem when Googlebot
> tried to brute-force our online make-your-own-adventure book, but
> Googlebot heeds robots.txt.)
>
> But it could be coupled with techniques inspired by spam tarpits: have
> the server reply at a crawl to force the bots to waste resources,
> while keeping the resource consumption on the server strictly bounded.
>
> Oh, I just noticed I was not the first one to think of it: Wikipedia
> tells me it's called a spider trap.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spider_trap
>
Sounds like a good idea, I'll have to think about it, feed the bots in 
256 byte pieces every 5 seconds to keep them from timing out, with 256 
bytes from rnd mixed in to make a dos packet? :) Just be sure the crc is 
good. ;-)

> Regards,

Take care now, Nicolas.

Cheers, Gene Heskett
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.
 - Louis D. Brandeis
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

swamp rat bots Q Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2020-12-03 14:00 +0100
  Re: swamp rat bots Q john doe <johndoe65534@mail.com> - 2020-12-03 14:10 +0100
    Re: swamp rat bots Q Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2020-12-03 15:10 +0100
      Re: swamp rat bots Q Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2020-12-03 15:20 +0100
        Re: swamp rat bots Q Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2020-12-03 20:00 +0100
          Re: swamp rat bots Q Håkon Alstadheim <hakon@alstadheim.priv.no> - 2020-12-03 22:00 +0100
          Re: swamp rat bots Q Keith Christian <keith1christian@gmail.com> - 2020-12-03 22:30 +0100
      Re: swamp rat bots Q john doe <johndoe65534@mail.com> - 2020-12-03 16:40 +0100
  Re: swamp rat bots Q Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2020-12-04 03:20 +0100
    Re: swamp rat bots Q Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2020-12-04 06:10 +0100
      Re: swamp rat bots Q Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2020-12-04 07:10 +0100
        Re: swamp rat bots Q john doe <johndoe65534@mail.com> - 2020-12-04 07:40 +0100
          Re: swamp rat bots Q Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2020-12-04 08:00 +0100
        Re: swamp rat bots Q Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2020-12-04 07:50 +0100
          Re: swamp rat bots Q john doe <johndoe65534@mail.com> - 2020-12-04 08:20 +0100
          Re: swamp rat bots Q Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2020-12-04 08:50 +0100
      Re: swamp rat bots Q "Jeremy Nicoll" <jn.ml.dbn.25@letterboxes.org> - 2020-12-04 11:50 +0100
        Re: swamp rat bots Q Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2020-12-04 14:50 +0100
      Re: swamp rat bots Q Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-12-04 12:00 +0100
  Re: swamp rat bots Q "hdv@gmail" <hdv.jadev@gmail.com> - 2020-12-04 10:00 +0100
    Re: swamp rat bots Q Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2020-12-04 14:50 +0100
      Re: swamp rat bots Q Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2020-12-04 18:40 +0100
        Re: swamp rat bots Q grumpy@mailfence.com - 2020-12-04 19:10 +0100
          Re: swamp rat bots Q Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2020-12-04 19:20 +0100
            Re: swamp rat bots Q Carl Fink <carlf@panix.com> - 2020-12-04 19:30 +0100
            Re: swamp rat bots Q Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2020-12-04 21:00 +0100
        Re: swamp rat bots Q Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2020-12-04 21:00 +0100
          Re: swamp rat bots Q Tixy <tixy@yxit.co.uk> - 2020-12-04 22:20 +0100
            Re: swamp rat bots Q Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2020-12-04 23:10 +0100
              Re: swamp rat bots Q Tixy <tixy@yxit.co.uk> - 2020-12-04 23:40 +0100
                Re: swamp rat bots Q Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2020-12-05 01:00 +0100
                Re: swamp rat bots Q Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-12-05 11:00 +0100
                Re: swamp rat bots Q elvis <elvis@dogonfire.com> - 2020-12-05 01:50 +0100
                Re: swamp rat bots Q grumpy@mailfence.com - 2020-12-05 02:00 +0100
    Web-bot tarpit aka spider trap (was: swamp rat bots Q) Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-12-04 15:10 +0100
      Re: Web-bot tarpit aka spider trap (was: swamp rat bots Q) Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2020-12-04 17:10 +0100
        Re: Web-bot tarpit aka spider trap (was: swamp rat bots Q) <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2020-12-04 22:10 +0100
          Re: Web-bot tarpit aka spider trap (was: swamp rat bots Q) "Martin McCormick" <martin.m@suddenlink.net> - 2020-12-06 20:20 +0100
            Re: Web-bot tarpit aka spider trap (was: swamp rat bots Q) David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2020-12-06 21:30 +0100
            Re: Web-bot tarpit aka spider trap (was: swamp rat bots Q) Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2020-12-06 23:10 +0100
              Re: Web-bot tarpit aka spider trap (was: swamp rat bots Q) Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2020-12-07 02:30 +0100
                Re: Web-bot tarpit aka spider trap (was: swamp rat bots Q) Doug McGarrett <dmcgarrett@optonline.net> - 2020-12-07 04:00 +0100

csiph-web