Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1035577

Bug#976331: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976331: Bug#976331: [JS Policy] what to set in "Provides" field ?

From Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk>
Newsgroups linux.debian.bugs.dist
Subject Bug#976331: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976331: Bug#976331: [JS Policy] what to set in "Provides" field ?
Date 2020-12-03 18:50 +0100
Message-ID <Bi0TT-2Vh-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (7 earlier) <BhZO9-2iJ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <BhVhv-7Xe-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Bi0TT-2Vh-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <BhVhv-7Xe-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Bi0TT-2Vh-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Quoting Pirate Praveen (2020-12-03 18:07:56)
> 
> 
> On 2020, ഡിസംബർ 3 10:03:18 PM IST, Xavier <yadd@debian.org> wrote:
> >I'm not in favor of your proposal: if I need a node-very-few-module
> >which is provided by a package with many dependencies, I'm not happy to
> >depend on it. To apply that, we should then choose with precaution in
> >which package we will embed each code. Packaging JS is already a hudge
> >work, I'm not sure we need more complexity.
> >
> >@JS-Team, does anyone have any other opinion? Else which option do you
> >choose? I'll update pkg-js-tools with your choice of course.
> 
> I agree with yadd here. We should not complicate js packaging more than it already is.

Rubbish: This debate is not about more or less complicated packaging.

We should make our js packaging *less* complicated.

More importantly, we should make js *maintenance* less complicated!

But most importantly, we should obey all "should"s in Debian policy: 
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#embedded-code-copies


 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Bug#976331: node-compression-webpack-plugin,node-copy-webpack-plugin,node-uglifyjs-webpack-plugin: contains hidden embedded nodejs module serialize-javascript Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk> - 2020-12-03 12:50 +0100
  Bug#976331: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976331: node-compression-webpack-plugin, node-copy-webpack-plugin, node-uglifyjs-webpack-plugin: contains hidden embedded nodejs module serialize-javascript Xavier <yadd@debian.org> - 2020-12-03 14:30 +0100
    Bug#976331: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976331: Bug#976331: node-compression-webpack-plugin, node-copy-webpack-plugin, node-uglifyjs-webpack-plugin: contains hidden embedded nodejs module serialize-javascript Xavier <yadd@debian.org> - 2020-12-03 14:40 +0100
      Bug#976331: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976331: Bug#976331: Bug#976331: node-compression-webpack-plugin, node-copy-webpack-plugin, node-uglifyjs-webpack-plugin: contains hidden embedded nodejs module serialize-javascript Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> - 2020-12-03 15:20 +0100
        Bug#976331: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976331: Bug#976331: Bug#976331: node-compression-webpack-plugin, node-copy-webpack-plugin, node-uglifyjs-webpack-plugin: contains hidden embedded nodejs module serialize-javascript Xavier <yadd@debian.org> - 2020-12-03 15:50 +0100
          Bug#976331: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976331: Bug#976331: Bug#976331: Bug#976331: node-compression-webpack-plugin, node-copy-webpack-plugin, node-uglifyjs-webpack-plugin: contains hidden embedded nodejs module serialize-javascript Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> - 2020-12-03 16:40 +0100
            Bug#976331: [JS Policy] what to set in "Provides" field ? Xavier <yadd@debian.org> - 2020-12-03 17:40 +0100
              Bug#976331: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976331: [JS Policy] what to set in "Provides" field ? Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> - 2020-12-03 18:30 +0100
                Bug#976331: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976331: [JS Policy] what to set in "Provides" field ? Xavier <yadd@debian.org> - 2020-12-03 18:50 +0100
                Bug#976331: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976331: Bug#976331: [JS Policy] what to set in "Provides" field ? Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> - 2020-12-03 19:30 +0100
                Bug#976331: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976331: Bug#976331: Bug#976331: [JS Policy] what to set in "Provides" field ? Pirate Praveen <praveen@onenetbeyond.org> - 2020-12-03 20:20 +0100
                Bug#976331: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976331: Bug#976331: Bug#976331: [JS Policy] what to set in "Provides" field ? Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> - 2020-12-03 20:50 +0100
                Bug#976331: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976331: Bug#976331: [JS Policy] what to set in "Provides" field ? Xavier <yadd@debian.org> - 2020-12-03 21:30 +0100
                Bug#976331: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976331: Bug#976331: Bug#976331: [JS Policy] what to set in "Provides" field ? Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> - 2020-12-06 02:20 +0100
                Bug#976331: [JS Policy] what to set in "Provides" field ? Xavier <yadd@debian.org> - 2020-12-06 08:10 +0100
                Bug#976331: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976331: [JS Policy] what to set in "Provides" field ? Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> - 2020-12-06 11:40 +0100
                Bug#976331: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976331: Bug#976331: [JS Policy] what to set in "Provides" field ? Pirate Praveen <praveen@onenetbeyond.org> - 2020-12-06 12:20 +0100
                Bug#976331: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976331: Bug#976331: [JS Policy] what to set in "Provides" field ? Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> - 2020-12-06 12:30 +0100
              Bug#976331: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976331: [JS Policy] what to set in "Provides" field ? Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> - 2020-12-03 19:30 +0100
  Bug#976331: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976331: Bug#976331: [JS Policy] what to set in "Provides" field ? Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> - 2020-12-03 18:50 +0100

csiph-web