Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.user > #228919

Re: Hijacking Threads [was: Re: rsync link corruption with -H and --link-dest]

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 04:55:19PM +0000, Gareth Evans wrote:

[...]

> Thanks to all who have replied pointing out the issues.

No worries. Things happen. No need to defend yourself, I hope.

> In my defence, I don't use conversation view in general (so lack experience) and had imagined Fastmail's documented approach (for its webmail and app) to be standards-based:
> 
> "Conversations get split apart and form new conversation threads when:
> 
> 1. The subject changes
>     This usually means a new topic is being discussed so a new conversation thread is formed.
> [...]"

Yeah. That's, sadly, something Outlook inflicted on us.

> https://www.fastmail.com/help/receive/conversations.html
> 
> I now realise this is at odds with the relevant standards (and eg. Thunderbird's approach):
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conversation_threading
> 
> Anyway, apologies.

It'd on me to apologise should I have created bad feelings.

This mailing list is a big marketplace, and trying to point
out conventions which help to keep communication easy is
something I do from time to time. I try to convey things
without being hurtful -- just tell me whenever I fail at
that :)

Cheers
-- t

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Hijacking Threads [was: Re: rsync link corruption with -H and  --link-dest] Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2020-11-22 17:20 +0100
  Re: Hijacking Threads [was: Re: rsync link corruption with -H and --link-dest] "Gareth Evans" <donotspam@fastmail.fm> - 2020-11-22 18:00 +0100
    Re: Hijacking Threads [was: Re: rsync link corruption with -H and  --link-dest] <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2020-11-22 18:30 +0100
      Re: Hijacking Threads [was: Re: rsync link corruption with -H and --link-dest] "Gareth Evans" <donotspam@fastmail.fm> - 2020-11-22 18:40 +0100
    Re: Hijacking Threads [was: Re: rsync link corruption with -H and  --link-dest] Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2020-11-22 18:30 +0100
      Re: Hijacking Threads [was: Re: rsync link corruption with -H and --link-dest] "Gareth Evans" <donotspam@fastmail.fm> - 2020-11-22 18:40 +0100
        Re: Hijacking Threads [was: Re: rsync link corruption with -H and  --link-dest] Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2020-11-22 19:00 +0100
        Re: Hijacking Threads [was: Re: rsync link corruption with -H and  --link-dest] Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2020-11-22 23:50 +0100
      Re: Hijacking Threads [was: Re: rsync link corruption with -H and --link-dest] "Gareth Evans" <garethevans@fastmail.fm> - 2020-11-22 18:50 +0100
      Re: Hijacking Threads [was: Re: rsync link corruption with -H and  --link-dest] Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2020-11-22 20:10 +0100
        Re: Hijacking Threads [was: Re: rsync link corruption with -H and  --link-dest] Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2020-11-22 20:20 +0100
          Re: Hijacking Threads [was: Re: rsync link corruption with -H and  --link-dest] Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2020-11-23 17:20 +0100
            Re: Hijacking Threads [was: Re: rsync link corruption with -H and  --link-dest] Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2020-11-23 23:20 +0100
    Re: Hijacking Threads [was: Re: rsync link corruption with -H and --link-dest] "Jeremy Nicoll" <jn.ml.dbn.25@letterboxes.org> - 2020-11-23 20:50 +0100

csiph-web