Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1033328
| From | Gunnar Hjalmarsson <gunnarhj@ubuntu.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist |
| Subject | Bug#974992: Licencing disagreement causes user confusion |
| Date | 2020-11-18 23:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <BcEhj-29O-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <BcdAt-3gT-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <BcDuW-1Ea-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <BcdAt-3gT-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <BcDuW-1Ea-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Hi! On 2020-11-18 22:45, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 07:04:22PM +0100, Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote: >> But vrms lists fonts-ubuntu as non-free also on Ubuntu systems. > > I don't understand why this happens: if it were shipped in > multiverse or restricted, I'd understand, but AIUI fonts-ubuntu is > part of ubuntu's main section, which should be detected as free by > vrms... Right, it's in main in Ubuntu, but I think the meaning of main differs between Debian and Ubuntu. "main" in Ubuntu means that it's a package where Canonical takes responsibility for security updates, as opposed to "universe" which is a community concern. I think the explanation can be found in d/control of fonts-ubuntu: https://tracker.debian.org/media/packages/f/fonts-ubuntu/control-0.83-4 It says "Section: non-free/fonts" also in the Ubuntu archive. And that's probably the reason why the adjustment I propose in the merge request makes a difference. > IOW: I don't see how vrms's code (or data) implements the above > position of Debian. Which leads me to another question, though > probably rather unrelated to this bug: where did you hear/read about > this being the Debian position? :) In d/copyright of fonts-ubuntu: https://tracker.debian.org/media/packages/f/fonts-ubuntu/copyright-0.83-4 > All that said,, in a later follow up to the bug report you wrote: > >> The idea is to apply the suggested exception at build time, but >> only when building for Ubuntu. On Debian it would keep working as >> it currently does. > > I'd probably take a patch which implements this. Crossing my fingers. :) On 2020-11-18 22:47, Holger Levsen wrote: > I'd appreciate if you could paste the output from running vrms to > this bug as well as the output of > > $ find /etc/apt/sources.list* -type f |xargs cat Please find two attachments with that info. -- Gunnar Hjalmarsson https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj
Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#974992: Licencing disagreement causes user confusion Gunnar Hjalmarsson <gunnarhj@ubuntu.com> - 2020-11-17 19:10 +0100
Bug#974992: Licencing disagreement causes user confusion Gunnar Hjalmarsson <gunnarhj@ubuntu.com> - 2020-11-18 01:50 +0100
Bug#974992: Licencing disagreement causes user confusion Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2020-11-18 22:50 +0100
Bug#974992: Licencing disagreement causes user confusion Gunnar Hjalmarsson <gunnarhj@ubuntu.com> - 2020-11-18 23:40 +0100
Bug#974992: Licencing disagreement causes user confusion Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2020-11-18 23:50 +0100
Bug#974992: Licencing disagreement causes user confusion Gunnar Hjalmarsson <gunnarhj@ubuntu.com> - 2020-11-19 00:30 +0100
Bug#974992: Licencing disagreement causes user confusion Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2020-11-18 23:00 +0100
csiph-web