Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1051791

Bug#982803: procps: broken alternative for /usr/bin/w left on the system

From Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.bugs.dist
Subject Bug#982803: procps: broken alternative for /usr/bin/w left on the system
Date 2021-03-11 12:10 +0100
Message-ID <BRrmy-27V-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <BItnB-4sz-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <BO86K-Py-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <BRqA9-1CP-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <BItnB-4sz-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <BRqA9-1CP-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization Debian

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Thu, 2021-03-11 at 11:13 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:

> Maybe there is a way for procps to avoid the bogus warning, but I do
> not currently see a good one.

The alternative could have been removed in the new preinst before
/usr/bin/w is removed by dpkg during the upgrade process.

https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ap-flowcharts.html

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Bug#982803: procps: broken alternative for /usr/bin/w left on the system Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2021-03-02 09:00 +0100
  Bug#982803: procps: broken alternative for /usr/bin/w left on the system Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de> - 2021-03-11 11:20 +0100
    Bug#982803: procps: broken alternative for /usr/bin/w left on the system Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2021-03-11 12:10 +0100
      Bug#982803: procps: broken alternative for /usr/bin/w left on the system Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2021-03-17 01:10 +0100

csiph-web