Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #232108
| From | Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Looking for a "text mode browser" (good description????) |
| Date | 2021-02-25 17:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <BMrwR-5lP-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <BMqhs-4n8-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <BMqr7-4Hf-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <BMqr7-4Hf-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <BMqU9-4TM-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <BMr3P-4X6-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 02/25/2021 09:40 AM, The Wanderer wrote: > On 2021-02-25 at 10:30, Richard Owlett wrote: > >> On 02/25/2021 09:06 AM, The Wanderer wrote: >> >>> On 2021-02-25 at 10:02, Michael Howard wrote: > >>>> Err, where do think SeaMonkey evolved from? >>> >>> As far as I'm aware, it's a lineal descendant of the Mozilla Suite, >>> just as Firefox and Thunderbird are - although, again AFAIK, only >>> Firefox is still an official Mozilla product. >> >> I date from era of Netscape Navigator. > > As do I; my first use of it was no later than the days when my family > was getting its Internet connection through dial-up with AOL 4.0. (And > maybe as early as 3.0.) > > I eventually decided that I do prefer having the mail client (etc.) > split out from the Web browser, as happened when the Mozilla Suite split > into Firefox and Thunderbird, if only so that when one hangs the other > doesn't. Other than that, though... > >> SeaMonkey is true to its roots. >> I *did* hint at a slight bias (didn't I :} > > That unified-suite factor, and a few UI considerations which applied > last time I looked (though it's been some years), are why I don't go > with Seamonkey myself. I certainly understand why others would, though. > Those a pretty close to why stay with SeaMonkey. I even have occasional use for Composer though its HTML is dated, to say the least.
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Looking for a "text mode browser" (good description????) Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2021-02-25 13:50 +0100
Re: Looking for a "text mode browser" (good description????) The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2021-02-25 13:50 +0100
Re: Looking for a "text mode browser" (good description????) Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2021-02-25 14:20 +0100
Re: Looking for a "text mode browser" (good description????) Nicholas Geovanis <nickgeovanis@gmail.com> - 2021-02-25 14:50 +0100
Re: Looking for a "text mode browser" (good description????) IL Ka <kazakevichilya@gmail.com> - 2021-02-25 14:00 +0100
Re: Looking for a "text mode browser" (good description????) <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-02-25 14:20 +0100
Re: Looking for a "text mode browser" (good description????) Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2021-02-25 14:30 +0100
Re: Looking for a "text mode browser" (good description????) Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2021-02-25 15:50 +0100
Re: Looking for a "text mode browser" (good description????) Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2021-02-25 14:40 +0100
Re: Looking for a "text mode browser" (good description????) Kent West <westk@acu.edu> - 2021-02-25 14:50 +0100
Re: Looking for a "text mode browser" (good description????) Karen Lewellen <klewellen@shellworld.net> - 2021-02-25 23:50 +0100
Re: Looking for a "text mode browser" (good description????) John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2021-02-25 15:00 +0100
Re: Looking for a "text mode browser" (good description????) "James B" <portoteacher80@fastmail.com> - 2021-02-25 15:50 +0100
Re: Looking for a "text mode browser" (good description????) Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2021-02-25 16:00 +0100
Re: Looking for a "text mode browser" (good description????) The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2021-02-25 16:10 +0100
Re: Looking for a "text mode browser" (good description????) "James B" <portoteacher80@fastmail.com> - 2021-02-25 16:20 +0100
Re: Looking for a "text mode browser" (good description????) Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2021-02-25 16:40 +0100
Re: Looking for a "text mode browser" (good description????) The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2021-02-25 16:50 +0100
Re: Looking for a "text mode browser" (good description????) Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2021-02-25 17:20 +0100
Re: Looking for a "text mode browser" (good description????) Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2021-02-25 23:50 +0100
Re: Looking for a "text mode browser" (good description????) Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2021-02-26 13:30 +0100
Re: Looking for a "text mode browser" (good description????) rhkramer@gmail.com - 2021-02-26 14:50 +0100
Re: Looking for a "text mode browser" (good description????) David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2021-02-26 01:30 +0100
Re: Looking for a "text mode browser" (good description????) Michael Howard <mike@dewberryfields.co.uk> - 2021-02-25 16:10 +0100
Re: Looking for a "text mode browser" (good description????) Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2021-02-25 16:20 +0100
Re: Looking for a "text mode browser" (good description????) <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-02-25 14:10 +0100
Re: Looking for a "text mode browser" (good description????) David <bouncingcats@gmail.com> - 2021-02-25 14:10 +0100
Re: Looking for a "text mode browser" (good description????) Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2021-02-25 14:40 +0100
csiph-web