Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #231654
| From | Michael Grant <mgrant@grant.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: How automatic are backport package updates? |
| Date | 2021-02-12 18:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <BHK77-2OC-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <BvETw-2WB-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <Bw57k-1W6-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <Bw7st-3aw-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <BwtMm-ck-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <BwtW2-ff-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Replying to this message that's just over a month old now. Now that 10.8 just came out, is this a good time to jump off the testing repo and onto stable for my production box? Is this one of those rare moments when testing and stable line up? Or should I continue to wait for Bullseye? On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 10:35:05AM -0500, Dan Ritter wrote: > Michael Grant wrote: >> Let's say I want to run 'testing' to be more on the edge to get the >> latest and greatest of packages and to incrementally always be on top >> of updates rather than having to do large release updates. But from >> time to time there is a security update to a package which is newer, >> or if something specific is broken, I may want to go back to a >> specific version of something. What should I put in my sources.list? > > Are you running a production system? Yes. > That is, are you running a Debian system which is essential to > your business or personal activities, so that having to recover > from a disaster would be a significant hardship? Well, yes, though I do have daily snapshots. > If so, you should be running buster, and considering moving to > the next stable release no sooner than a few weeks after the > transition to bullseye. You should accept security updates as > soon as is convenient for you, on an ongoing basis. Backports > are to solve specific issues. > > If you are running a system for fun, or if there is no real > issue with protracted unavailability, testing is a fine thing > to be running. You should expect a little chaos every time you > update. > > Only stable gets security updates. Testing may get security > updates when they come from upstream, but it's not guaranteed. I thought all security updates were tested in testing, committed to testing, and then also committed to stable-security. I had not noticed that testing was not getting security updates, I thought it was, maybe again, it was just luck that the packages I noticed needed security updates were the ones I mentally track most like sendmail, dovecot, spamassassin... Michael Grant
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: How automatic are backport package updates? Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2021-01-09 07:00 +0100
Re: How automatic are backport package updates? Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2021-01-09 15:00 +0100
Re: How automatic are backport package updates? Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2021-01-10 10:10 +0100
Re: How automatic are backport package updates? Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2021-01-11 14:10 +0100
Re: How automatic are backport package updates? songbird <songbird@anthive.com> - 2021-01-11 16:40 +0100
Re: How automatic are backport package updates? Michael Grant <mgrant@grant.org> - 2021-01-12 16:30 +0100
Re: How automatic are backport package updates? Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2021-01-12 16:40 +0100
Re: How automatic are backport package updates? Michael Grant <mgrant@grant.org> - 2021-01-12 17:10 +0100
Re: How automatic are backport package updates? Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2021-01-12 17:30 +0100
Re: How automatic are backport package updates? Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2021-01-12 20:30 +0100
Re: How automatic are backport package updates? Michael Grant <mgrant@grant.org> - 2021-02-12 18:10 +0100
Re: How automatic are backport package updates? Tixy <tixy@yxit.co.uk> - 2021-02-12 18:20 +0100
Re: How automatic are backport package updates? "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2021-02-13 15:40 +0100
Re: How automatic are backport package updates? Michael Grant <mgrant@grant.org> - 2021-02-13 16:50 +0100
Re: How automatic are backport package updates? songbird <songbird@anthive.com> - 2021-02-13 17:40 +0100
Re: How automatic are backport package updates? Michael Grant <mgrant@grant.org> - 2021-02-13 18:00 +0100
Re: How automatic are backport package updates? Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2021-02-13 18:10 +0100
Re: How automatic are backport package updates? Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2021-02-13 18:30 +0100
Re: How automatic are backport package updates? Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2021-02-13 18:30 +0100
Re: How automatic are backport package updates? Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2021-02-13 18:00 +0100
Re: How automatic are backport package updates? Michael Grant <mgrant@grant.org> - 2021-02-13 18:20 +0100
Re: How automatic are backport package updates? Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2021-02-15 14:30 +0100
Re: How automatic are backport package updates? Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2021-02-16 10:20 +0100
Re: How automatic are backport package updates? Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2021-01-12 21:00 +0100
Re: How automatic are backport package updates? Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2021-01-11 20:30 +0100
Re: How automatic are backport package updates? Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2021-01-11 21:00 +0100
Re: How automatic are backport package updates? Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-01-11 22:00 +0100
Re: How automatic are backport package updates? Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2021-01-12 01:20 +0100
Re: How automatic are backport package updates? Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2021-01-12 09:00 +0100
csiph-web