Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1045107

Bug#981232: unblock: perl/5.32.1-1

From Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.devel.release
Subject Bug#981232: unblock: perl/5.32.1-1
Date 2021-01-28 22:30 +0100
Message-ID <BCn1v-6AB-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <BC2Jr-2uy-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <BCm5s-61E-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <BCmIa-6ue-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <BC2Jr-2uy-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <BCmIa-6ue-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hi Dominic,

On 28-01-2021 22:05, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
>>> 5.32.1 would need a binnmu of a few leaf packages
>>> (libpar-packer-perl libdevel-cover-perl libclass-xsaccessor-perl
>>> libcommon-sense-perl) as usual.
>>
>> Just to be clear, these binNMU's would be needed too if we would go for
>> the cherry-pick option?
> 
> No, the binaries relate to a change of upstream version number
> which ends up being encoded in these packages. If we cherry pick
> fixes, the binNMUs wouldn't be needed.

But then, that relation is strictly speaking too tight? Is that
something that can be improved (without jumping through hoops)? Maybe
not for this time, but for future changes. Normally perl packages look
for the perl-something-api right? Which would make it clear that this is
no transition.

Would you have also asked us if you wouldn't have needed the binNMU's?

Paul

Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Bug#981232: unblock: perl/5.32.1-1 Dominic Hargreaves <dom@earth.li> - 2021-01-28 00:50 +0100
  Bug#981232: unblock: perl/5.32.1-1 Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> - 2021-01-28 21:30 +0100
    Bug#981232: unblock: perl/5.32.1-1 Dominic Hargreaves <dom@earth.li> - 2021-01-28 22:10 +0100
      Bug#981232: unblock: perl/5.32.1-1 Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> - 2021-01-28 22:30 +0100
        Bug#981232: unblock: perl/5.32.1-1 Dominic Hargreaves <dom@earth.li> - 2021-01-28 22:40 +0100
          Bug#981232: unblock: perl/5.32.1-1 Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> - 2021-01-30 07:40 +0100
            Bug#981232: unblock: perl/5.32.1-1 Niko Tyni <ntyni@debian.org> - 2021-01-30 20:20 +0100
              Bug#981232: unblock: perl/5.32.1-1 Dominic Hargreaves <dom@earth.li> - 2021-01-30 20:50 +0100
                Bug#981232: unblock: perl/5.32.1-1 Niko Tyni <ntyni@debian.org> - 2021-01-31 10:10 +0100
                Bug#981232: unblock: perl/5.32.1-1 Niko Tyni <ntyni@debian.org> - 2021-01-31 22:00 +0100
                Bug#981232: unblock: perl/5.32.1-1 Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> - 2021-02-01 20:40 +0100
                Bug#981232: unblock: perl/5.32.1-1 Dominic Hargreaves <dom@earth.li> - 2021-02-02 09:00 +0100
                Bug#981232: unblock: perl/5.32.1-1 Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> - 2021-02-02 09:20 +0100
                Bug#981232: unblock: perl/5.32.1-1 Dominic Hargreaves <dom@earth.li> - 2021-02-02 23:20 +0100
        Bug#981232: unblock: perl/5.32.1-1 Niko Tyni <ntyni@debian.org> - 2021-01-29 13:50 +0100

csiph-web