Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1044406

Bug#959469: buster-pu: package openssl/1.1.1g-1

From	Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.maint.boot, linux.debian.devel.release
Subject	Bug#959469: buster-pu: package openssl/1.1.1g-1
Date	2021-01-25 20:10 +0100
Message-ID	<BBffI-47r-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(7 earlier) <BA7DA-3a4-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <BBe9X-3vp-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <BBe9X-3vp-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <A25Gp-537-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <BBe9X-3vp-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	Debian

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> (2021-01-25):
> KiBi - I'm assuming that it would be much easier for you to check d-i
> against the new OpenSSL version if it were already in p-u?

Not really *much* easier, to be honest. I can definitely build a package
locally given a source debdiff, or slightly better, given a source
package I can run dget against (since we're talking about new upstream
releases, by the looks of it), and do whatever testing with the
generated packages built into d-i and/or fetched from the network as
required (similarly to what's done for the various kernel udebs).

IOW that can be tested before even having to make a decision regarding a
possible acceptance into p-u.


Cheers,
-- 
Cyril Brulebois (kibi@debian.org)            <https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant

Thread

Bug#959469: buster-pu: package openssl/1.1.1g-1 Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> - 2021-01-09 00:20 +0100
  Bug#959469: buster-pu: package openssl/1.1.1g-1 "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> - 2021-01-14 18:50 +0100
    Bug#959469: buster-pu: package openssl/1.1.1g-1 Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> - 2021-01-14 19:10 +0100
      Bug#959469: buster-pu: package openssl/1.1.1g-1 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> - 2021-01-14 21:20 +0100
        Bug#959469: buster-pu: package openssl/1.1.1g-1 Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> - 2021-01-16 19:20 +0100
          Bug#959469: buster-pu: package openssl/1.1.1g-1 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> - 2021-01-21 21:10 +0100
            Bug#959469: buster-pu: package openssl/1.1.1g-1 "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> - 2021-01-22 17:50 +0100
              Bug#959469: buster-pu: package openssl/1.1.1g-1 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> - 2021-01-24 12:30 +0100
              Bug#959469: buster-pu: package openssl/1.1.1g-1 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> - 2021-01-24 13:10 +0100
              Bug#959469: buster-pu: package openssl/1.1.1g-1 "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> - 2021-01-25 19:00 +0100
                Bug#959469: buster-pu: package openssl/1.1.1g-1 Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2021-01-25 20:10 +0100
                Bug#959469: buster-pu: package openssl/1.1.1g-1 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> - 2021-01-25 21:10 +0100
      Bug#959469: buster-pu: package openssl/1.1.1g-1 Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> - 2021-01-28 00:40 +0100
        Bug#959469: buster-pu: package openssl/1.1.1g-1 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> - 2021-01-29 20:40 +0100
          Bug#959469: buster-pu: package openssl/1.1.1g-1 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> - 2021-02-02 00:00 +0100
            Bug#959469: buster-pu: package openssl/1.1.1g-1 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> - 2021-02-10 22:00 +0100

csiph-web