Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #228314
| From | Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: getmail, getmail6, testing, unstable, python-is-python3 |
| Date | 2020-10-27 19:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <B4BJD-6tL-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <B4xmF-3He-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <B4xPH-46u-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <B4ysq-4jq-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <B4yC6-4mH-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <B4AXr-5UL-131@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi. On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 01:20:17PM -0400, songbird wrote: > Reco wrote: > ... > > Because python. Be it python 2 or python 3 - it's (in)famous for one > > thing - lack of backwards compatibility. Sooner or later they replace > > python 3.8 (current sid) with, say, python 3.9 - and the things will > > break again. > > Because they did on 3.7->3.8 transition, did before that on 3.6->3.7 > > transition and this list goes long way back. > > i've not had any problems with python3 here, but i > don't do strange things with python3. Because it's not your burden ;) Every time a major change like python transition happens in Debian - packages start breaking. It's up for the maintainer to fix such breakages (obviously), and once in a while a maintainer goes MIA. What happens next is packages get deleted from testing first, sid second. Luckily the bullseye package freeze should be happening Soon™, so it's unlikely we'll see python 3.9 (and inevitable collateral damage it brings) in bullseye. > oh, let me rephrase that, during a recent round i had a problem with a > program, but that wasn't anything i did so it was somewhere in the > stack of modules that program used. does that mean it was > incompatible? I cannot tell you that without going into specifics (python version, modules used, all usual stuff). Usually it's pretty clear from Python backtrace. > no, it just meant there was a bug introduced which > eventually got fixed. It means you got lucky that time. I would not count on such luck next time. Reco
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
getmail, getmail6, testing, unstable, python-is-python3 songbird <songbird@anthive.com> - 2020-10-27 14:20 +0100
Re: getmail, getmail6, testing, unstable, python-is-python3 mick crane <mick.crane@gmail.com> - 2020-10-27 14:40 +0100
Re: getmail, getmail6, testing, unstable, python-is-python3 songbird <songbird@anthive.com> - 2020-10-27 15:00 +0100
Re: getmail, getmail6, testing, unstable, python-is-python3 Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2020-10-27 15:10 +0100
Re: getmail, getmail6, testing, unstable, python-is-python3 Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2020-10-27 15:20 +0100
Re: getmail, getmail6, testing, unstable, python-is-python3 Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2020-10-27 15:50 +0100
Re: getmail, getmail6, testing, unstable, python-is-python3 Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2020-10-28 19:20 +0100
Re: getmail, getmail6, testing, unstable, python-is-python3 songbird <songbird@anthive.com> - 2020-10-27 15:50 +0100
Re: getmail, getmail6, testing, unstable, python-is-python3 Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2020-10-27 16:00 +0100
Re: getmail, getmail6, testing, unstable, python-is-python3 Cindy Sue Causey <butterflybytes@gmail.com> - 2020-10-27 16:30 +0100
Re: getmail, getmail6, testing, unstable, python-is-python3 songbird <songbird@anthive.com> - 2020-10-27 18:30 +0100
Re: getmail, getmail6, testing, unstable, python-is-python3 Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2020-10-27 19:20 +0100
csiph-web