Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #12949
| From | Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: Python 2 support for Bullseye |
| Date | 2020-10-16 20:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <B0CEh-eI-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <B0CkW-7y-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 10/16/20 8:04 PM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > There will be few core packages build-depending on Python 2 (for tests > or building) which won't be ready for Python 3 for Bullseye (Chromium, > qtwebkit and IIRC also Pypy), but those only need Python 2 (and a very > small set of support packages like setuptools/jinja) to build and > run their tests. > > Apart from those there's only a handful of packages still in testing > which have a run time dependency on Python 2 packages (and most are > actively being worked on (e.g. Xen)). > > All packages (and their test suites) shipped in Debian are trusted > anyway (and consequently don't need any kind of updates during the > bullseye cycle), so a lack of updates/upstream EOL doesn't matter. > > As such, I'd propose to include Python 2 (plus the small set of > support packages) in Bullseye ok. I think you should explicitly name all these packages. > but exempt it from support (and then > remove it for good after the Bullseye release): not ok. That would mean removing pypy3 from the archive as well. If you don't want to support Python2, then why do you care about it's removal for bullseye+1? > - Mark src:python (plus related support packages) as unsupported in > debian-security-support and with a README.Debian in the source > package (and given how prominent Python is, also in the release notes) That should list the binary packages, there's no src:python package. > - Bump the severity of the few remaining packages in testing to RC > state (and force them out testing if auto removals were blocked > for some reason) See above, I think it's unfriendly to push out pypy3. Matthias
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Python 2 support for Bullseye Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2020-10-16 20:10 +0200
Re: Python 2 support for Bullseye Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2020-10-16 20:30 +0200
Re: Python 2 support for Bullseye Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2020-10-16 20:40 +0200
Re: Python 2 support for Bullseye Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2020-12-11 19:10 +0100
Re: Python 2 support for Bullseye Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2020-11-15 19:10 +0100
Re: Python 2 support for Bullseye Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2020-10-16 20:40 +0200
Re: Python 2 support for Bullseye Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2020-10-16 21:00 +0200
csiph-web