Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1019768

Bug#951048: util-linux: please build with dm-verity support when uploading 2.35

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Fri, 24 Jul 2020 14:37:36 +0100 Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-07-24 at 15:19 +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> > Luca, Helmut, everyone reading at home,
> > 
> > * Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org> [200724 15:11]:
> > > > PR opened at https://github.com/karelzak/util-linux/pull/1084
> > > 
> > > PR for dlopen() has been merged and it's part of the 2.36 release which
> > > was just uploaded to unstable, so opened another MR to enable it again
> > > (in dlopen mode):
> > > 
> > > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/util-linux/-/merge_requests/16
> > > 
> > > Built locally and confirmed there's no linkage, and thus no dependency,
> > > and strace shows libcryptsetup is only loaded if one of the verity
> > > options is requested, so there should not be any conflict in the
> > > future.
> > 
> > Okay, I see the PR.
> > 
> > However:
> > 
> > 1) Helmut, will this cause problems again for bootstrapping or is
> > this fine?
> > 
> > 2) What exactly are we doing this for? What is the usecase for
> > Debian?
> 
> 1) Helmut should double-check, but there's no runtime dependency of any
> kind (-dev package, pkg-config, linking) and the build-dep is marked as
> !stage1, so should all be good on that front as far as I can tell
> 
> 2) it's an end-user feature for anybody (myself being one) wanting to
> use verity-protected volumes (integrity checks, possible signature
> checks) on their machines 
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/admin-guide/device-mapper/verity.html
> https://gitlab.com/cryptsetup/cryptsetup/-/wikis/DMVerity

Hello Chris,

Helmut reviewed and approved the MR (thanks!)[0], anything else left to do for this?

Thank you!

-- 
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi

[0] https://salsa.debian.org/debian/util-linux/-/merge_requests/16#note_183169

Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Bug#951048: util-linux: please build with dm-verity support when uploading 2.35 Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> - 2020-06-29 20:20 +0200
  Bug#951048: util-linux: please build with dm-verity support when uploading 2.35 Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org> - 2020-06-30 10:40 +0200
    Bug#951048: util-linux: please build with dm-verity support when uploading 2.35 Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org> - 2020-07-24 15:20 +0200
      Bug#951048: util-linux: please build with dm-verity support when uploading 2.35 Chris Hofstaedtler <zeha@debian.org> - 2020-07-24 15:30 +0200
        Bug#951048: util-linux: please build with dm-verity support when uploading 2.35 Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org> - 2020-07-24 15:40 +0200
          Bug#951048: util-linux: please build with dm-verity support when uploading 2.35 Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org> - 2020-07-30 11:30 +0200
            Bug#951048: util-linux: please build with dm-verity support when uploading 2.35 Chris Hofstaedtler <zeha@debian.org> - 2020-08-04 18:10 +0200
              Bug#951048: util-linux: please build with dm-verity support when uploading 2.35 Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org> - 2020-08-05 14:30 +0200

csiph-web