Bug#885195: [Pkg-electronics-devel] Bug#885195: Bug#885195: geda-gaf: please migrate to guile-2.2

From	Bdale Garbee <bdale@gag.com>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.bugs.rc
Subject	Bug#885195: [Pkg-electronics-devel] Bug#885195: Bug#885195: geda-gaf: please migrate to guile-2.2
Date	2020-07-16 07:00 +0200
Message-ID	<At49X-2sH-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(6 earlier) <AshLY-78V-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Astk5-5Ds-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <At0zo-rC-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <xmKkx-3Y0-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <At0zo-rC-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Rob Browning <rlb@defaultvalue.org> writes:

> Bdale Garbee <bdale@gag.com> writes:
>
>> I'm not interested in maintaining pcb any more.
>
> Does that mean geda-gaf etc?  If so might it make sense for you (or
> who?) to file a removal request, i.e. ROM or similar?

Sorry, you make a good point, geda-gaf and pcb aren't the same thing.
While I no longer use either (choosing to use the forks lepton-eda and
pcb-rnd instead), there's no immediate need to shove pcb out of the
archive.

However, I see little chance of geda-gaf upstream working on the things
needed to keep it viable in Debian any time soon, and with lepton-eda in
my mind a complete replacement that still works with the same file
formats, etc, I see no reason to go nuts trying to make geda-gaf better. 

I'll file a removal request for geda-gaf.

Bdale

Back to linux.debian.bugs.rc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Bug#885195: [Pkg-electronics-devel] Bug#885195: Bug#885195: geda-gaf: please migrate to guile-2.2 Bdale Garbee <bdale@gag.com> - 2020-07-14 15:40 +0200
  Bug#885195: [Pkg-electronics-devel] Bug#885195: Bug#885195: geda-gaf: please migrate to guile-2.2 Bdale Garbee <bdale@gag.com> - 2020-07-16 07:00 +0200

csiph-web