Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1017817

Bug#963247: ignition-fuel-tools FTBFS with Protobuf 3.12.3

Show all headers | View raw

On 2020-07-12 16:39:34, jspricke@debian.org wrote:
> * László Böszörményi (GCS) <gcs@debian.org> [2020-07-12 10:56]:
> > > Since ignition-msgs is the only package that has this issue, something
> > > like the following should be enough:
> > > 
> > > In debian/control:
> > > 
> > > Depends: libprotobuf-dev (>= ${protobuf:Upstream-Version}), libprotobuf-dev (< ${protobuf:Upstream-Version}.1)
> > > 
> > > In debian/rules:
> > > 
> > > override_dh_gencontrol:
> > >         dh_gencontrol -- -Vprotobuf:Upstream-Version="$(shell dpkg-query -W -f '$${Source:Upstream-Version}' libprotobuf-dev)"
> 
> Thanks Sebastian for coming up with this :).
> 
> > > (This might be a little to tight and depending on >= X.Y, < X.(Y+1)
> > > would be enough).
> > Right, in minor versions Google does not intend to change ABI I'm pretty sure.
> 
> So maybe something like this?
> 
> Depends: libprotobuf-dev (>= ${protobuf:Upstream-Version}), libprotobuf-dev (< ${protobuf:Upstream-Version}a)
> 
> override_dh_gencontrol:
>         dh_gencontrol -- -Vprotobuf:Upstream-Version="$(shell dpkg-query -W -f '$${Source:Upstream-Version}' libprotobuf-dev | cut -d. -f1-2)"
> 
> Or would there be a better way?
> 
> > > But yes, depending on a protobuf-abi-$VER provided by libprotobuf-dev
> > > could also work. It wouldn't work if provided by the shared library,
> > > though, as they are co-installable.
> > This is correct - I just feel misunderstandable that -dev would
> > provide an ABI version and will change that to API if needed.
> > @Jochen: You need to update ignition-fuel-tools anyway. Would a
> > stricter dependency on libprotobuf-dev be enough for you or should I
> > provide an API string in libprotobuf-dev for you?
> 
> I think the question is who is in control of bumping the ABI/API version. If
> you think the hack above is enough, then that's fine with me. If you want to
> be in control of it, upstream changes the logic, or more packages need it,
> then a provides makes more sense to me.

I'm not sure if there are other packages that are affected by this
issue. So far only ignition-msgs and its reverse dependencies seem to be
affected. But maybe there just aren't any other autopkgtests that use
the headers generated by protobuf.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Bug#963247: ignition-fuel-tools FTBFS with Protobuf 3.12.3 László Böszörményi (GCS) <gcs@debian.org> - 2020-06-21 13:40 +0200
  Bug#963247: ignition-fuel-tools FTBFS with Protobuf 3.12.3 Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> - 2020-07-11 17:00 +0200
    Bug#963247: ignition-fuel-tools FTBFS with Protobuf 3.12.3 jspricke@debian.org - 2020-07-11 18:00 +0200
      Bug#963247: ignition-fuel-tools FTBFS with Protobuf 3.12.3 László Böszörményi (GCS) <gcs@debian.org> - 2020-07-11 23:00 +0200
        Bug#963247: ignition-fuel-tools FTBFS with Protobuf 3.12.3 Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> - 2020-07-12 10:40 +0200
          Bug#963247: ignition-fuel-tools FTBFS with Protobuf 3.12.3 László Böszörményi (GCS) <gcs@debian.org> - 2020-07-12 11:10 +0200
            Bug#963247: ignition-fuel-tools FTBFS with Protobuf 3.12.3 jspricke@debian.org - 2020-07-12 16:50 +0200
              Bug#963247: ignition-fuel-tools FTBFS with Protobuf 3.12.3 Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> - 2020-07-13 13:30 +0200
                Bug#963247: ignition-fuel-tools FTBFS with Protobuf 3.12.3 jspricke@debian.org - 2020-07-14 23:30 +0200
                Bug#963247: ignition-fuel-tools FTBFS with Protobuf 3.12.3 jspricke@debian.org - 2020-07-15 15:50 +0200
                Bug#963247: ignition-fuel-tools FTBFS with Protobuf 3.12.3 Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> - 2020-07-15 22:10 +0200

csiph-web