Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #224384
| From | Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: sources.list for security |
| Date | 2020-07-05 09:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <Ap7pL-47H-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <Ap6tH-3zl-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Du, 05 iul 20, 08:14:28, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> hi,
>
> I found several proposals for thre security entry
>
> deb http://security.debian.org/ buster/updates main contrib non-free
> deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security buster/updates main contrib non-free
[fixed wrapping]
> deb http://deb.debian.org/debian-security/ buster/updates main
>
> which one must be chosen?
According to https://security.debian.org (redirects to
https://www.debian.org/security) the second entry is correct.
The first one seems to point to the same place as far as I can tell
(didn't look very deep though).
The third entry appears to be an alternate distribution channel and also
supports https (in case it matters to you).
I'm using the third, mostly for consistency with the other entries.
Updated packages have been available as soon as the DSA was sent to
debian-security-announce.
The 'component' part ('main', etc.) should always match your other
repositories.
[Rant]
It's confusing that Debian has several schemes for URLs and suites, e.g.
compare:
http://security.debian.org/ buster/updates main
with
http://deb.debian.org/debian buster-updates main
It would be less confusing if all repositories had the same URL and used
only the 'suite' part to distinguish them ('stable', 'stable-security',
etc.).
Hopping this will be fixed for 'bullseye'...
(this message is BCCd to Security and FTPMaster teams)
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
sources.list for security Pierre Frenkiel <p.frenkiel@laposte.net> - 2020-07-05 08:40 +0200
Re: sources.list for security "der.hans" <deb-user@LuftHans.com> - 2020-07-05 09:00 +0200
Re: sources.list for security john doe <johndoe65534@mail.com> - 2020-07-05 09:00 +0200
Re: sources.list for security Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-07-05 09:40 +0200
Re: sources.list for security Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2020-07-05 10:00 +0200
Re: sources.list for security Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-07-05 10:50 +0200
Re: sources.list for security songbird <songbird@anthive.com> - 2020-07-05 16:10 +0200
Re: sources.list for security Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-07-05 17:50 +0200
Re: sources.list for security songbird <songbird@anthive.com> - 2020-07-06 00:20 +0200
Re: sources.list for security Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2020-07-06 01:20 +0200
Re: sources.list for security songbird <songbird@anthive.com> - 2020-07-06 01:40 +0200
Re: sources.list for security Keith bainbridge <keithrbau@gmail.com> - 2020-07-06 04:20 +0200
Re: sources.list for security Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-07-06 08:00 +0200
Re: sources.list for security songbird <songbird@anthive.com> - 2020-07-06 19:10 +0200
Re: sources.list for security Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2020-07-06 14:20 +0200
Re: sources.list for security songbird <songbird@anthive.com> - 2020-07-06 19:20 +0200
csiph-web