Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #224112

Re: WINE vs Virtual Machine for Windows app on Buster

From manish tripathi <manishtrips@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: WINE vs Virtual Machine for Windows app on Buster
Date 2020-06-27 18:50 +0200
Message-ID <AmmbE-4Yp-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <AmeQP-vH-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <AmfMS-14D-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <Amgzf-1Bd-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <AmiB4-2M9-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Thank you Nate. That is quite informative. In my case there is no need to
share files over a network, though some data may be required to be stored
in the local machine.

Trips



On Sat, Jun 27, 2020, 6:27 PM Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> wrote:

> * On 2020 27 Jun 05:48 -0500, manish tripathi wrote:
> > Thank you for the responses. I was looking for a general purpose
> > solution...I can safely assume that VM soln may mostly work, while the
> same
> > may not be guaranteed with use of WINE.
>
> IME, Qemu has various issues with Windows guests, such things as the
> mouse cursor not being able to go to certain desktop edges after a time
> of running.  I found VirtualBox was much better suited for Windows
> guests but VB is not a part of Buster or Bullseye in the main
> repositories so I had to install the packages made available by Lucas
> Nussbaum for Buster: https://people.debian.org/~lucas/virtualbox-buster/
>
> > Can one also explain about the malware that may impact my Linux/Buster,
> in
> > case I use a VM for running my Windows app and what can I do to minimise
> > such impact.
>
> Someone may have better information, but it seems to me that the VM is
> rather well sandboxed whether Qemu or VB.  If there are shared folders
> then malware could have access to those files and the network.
> Certainly, anything/everything in the VM could be compromised.
> VirtualBox has the feature of snapshots so that a VM could be rolled
> back to a known (suspected?) good state.
>
> - Nate
>
> --
>
> "The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all
> possible worlds.  The pessimist fears this is true."
>
> Web: https://www.n0nb.us
> Projects: https://github.com/N0NB
> GPG fingerprint: 82D6 4F6B 0E67 CD41 F689 BBA6 FB2C 5130 D55A 8819
>
>

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

WINE vs Virtual Machine for Windows app on Buster manish tripathi <manishtrips@gmail.com> - 2020-06-27 11:00 +0200
  Re: WINE vs Virtual Machine for Windows app on Buster Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> - 2020-06-27 11:30 +0200
  Re: WINE vs Virtual Machine for Windows app on Buster l0f4r0@tuta.io - 2020-06-27 12:00 +0200
    Re: WINE vs Virtual Machine for Windows app on Buster manish tripathi <manishtrips@gmail.com> - 2020-06-27 12:50 +0200
      Re: WINE vs Virtual Machine for Windows app on Buster Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> - 2020-06-27 15:00 +0200
        Re: WINE vs Virtual Machine for Windows app on Buster manish tripathi <manishtrips@gmail.com> - 2020-06-27 18:50 +0200
  Re: WINE vs Virtual Machine for Windows app on Buster l0f4r0@tuta.io - 2020-06-27 12:20 +0200

csiph-web