Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1012612

Bug#961195: transition: glibc

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 2020-06-04 13:06, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 5/21/20 11:39 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> > 
> > Dear release team,
> > 
> > I would like to get a transition slot for glibc 2.31. It is available in
> > experimental for more than 2 months and there are no known issues or
> > regression.  It has been built successfully on all release architectures
> > and most ports architectures. It fails to build on ia64 and sparc64 due
> > to a few testsuite issues that need to be investigated and which are
> > similar to existing failures in version 2.30. It doesn't build on
> > kfreebsd-*, but this has been the case for a few glibc releases already.
> > 
> > As glibc is using symbol versioning, there is no soname change. That
> > said a few packages are using libc internal symbols and have to be
> > rebuilt for this transition:
> >  - apitrace
> >  - bro
> >  - dante
> >  - gcc-9 (s390x only)
> >  - libnih
> >  - libnss-db
> >  - r-bioc-preprocesscore
> >  - unscd
> > 
> > Compare to the previous transition, gcc-10 and gcc-snapshot got removed,
> > and r-bioc-preprocesscore got added.
> > 
> > Here is the corresponding ben file:
> >   title = "glibc";
> >   is_affected = .depends ~ /libc[0-9.]* \(<</;
> >   is_good = .depends ~ /libc[0-9.]* \(<< 2.32\)/;
> >   is_bad = .depends ~ /libc[0-9.]* \(<< 2.31\)/;
> > 
> > In addition a few new symbols have been added that might prevent a few
> > other packages to migrate to testing until glibc migrates if they pick
> > up the new symbols, however those are really limited in this version.
> 
> there are dozens of packages that ftbfs with this new version.  Please could you
> at least file bug reports for all of those?

Yes I can do that. Do you have a list available?

Aurelien

-- 
Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurelien@aurel32.net                 http://www.aurel32.net

Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Bug#961195: transition: glibc Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org> - 2020-05-21 11:50 +0200
  Bug#961195: transition: glibc Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2020-06-04 13:10 +0200
    Bug#961195: transition: glibc Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2020-06-04 13:50 +0200
    Bug#961195: transition: glibc Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org> - 2020-06-04 14:10 +0200
      Bug#961195: transition: glibc Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2020-06-04 14:20 +0200
        Bug#961195: transition: glibc Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org> - 2020-07-04 00:20 +0200
          Bug#961195: transition: glibc Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2020-07-27 08:00 +0200
            Bug#961195: transition: glibc Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> - 2020-07-27 10:00 +0200
  Bug#961195: transition: glibc Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net> - 2020-07-13 20:00 +0200
  Bug#961195: transition: glibc Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net> - 2020-07-13 21:50 +0200
  Bug#961195: transition: glibc Andreas Beckmann <anbe@debian.org> - 2020-07-27 11:30 +0200

csiph-web