Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1026200
| From | Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist |
| Subject | Bug#944738: [Openjdk] Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base |
| Date | 2020-09-23 22:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ASj5M-1Xe-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <ARJvj-5Xj-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <AScnD-6pP-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <AShwZ-1b7-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <z2pnX-1pI-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <AShwZ-1b7-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 11:09:28AM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> > dh_strip_nondeterminism gets its timestamp from the debian/changelog
> > file, while strip-nondeterminism strips the timestamps.
> >
> > So here's a replacement patch which fixes everything except
> > java.naming.jmod. I have to run now, but will try to figure out
> > tomorrow why that one still breaks.
>
> I rebuilt with this patch (and also my NONPARALLEL patch) and am able to
> call jlink against all of the modules shipped with the resulting JDK
> binary package. So this is looking good.
>
> I'm rebuilding now (without nonparallel) what should be the NMU candidate.
Super! I wonder, though, why it didn't work for me first time round?
I rebuilt it and it worked the second time, though. So maybe I
changed something.
Obviously, similar builds will be needed for openjdk-{11,13,14,15}.
Best wishes,
Julian
Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base Bill Zaumen <bill.zaumen@gmail.com> - 2020-08-20 07:10 +0200
Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> - 2020-09-17 20:10 +0200
Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> - 2020-09-18 12:20 +0200
Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> - 2020-09-18 12:30 +0200
Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2020-09-18 16:20 +0200
Bug#944738: [Openjdk] Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base Tiago Daitx <tiago.daitx@canonical.com> - 2020-09-18 18:20 +0200
Bug#944738: [Openjdk] Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> - 2020-09-18 18:30 +0200
Bug#944738: [Openjdk] Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2020-09-21 07:10 +0200
Bug#944738: [Openjdk] Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> - 2020-09-21 11:10 +0200
Bug#944738: [Openjdk] Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2020-09-21 16:10 +0200
Bug#944738: [Openjdk] Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> - 2020-09-21 22:30 +0200
Bug#944738: [Openjdk] Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2020-09-22 08:00 +0200
Bug#944738: [Openjdk] Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> - 2020-09-22 11:10 +0200
Bug#944738: [Openjdk] Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2020-09-22 16:20 +0200
Bug#944738: [Openjdk] Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> - 2020-09-23 14:50 +0200
Bug#944738: [Openjdk] Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2020-09-23 20:20 +0200
Bug#944738: [Openjdk] Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> - 2020-09-23 22:00 +0200
Bug#944738: [Openjdk] Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2020-09-24 06:00 +0200
Bug#944738: [Openjdk] Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> - 2020-09-24 12:00 +0200
Bug#944738: [Openjdk] Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2020-09-25 02:30 +0200
Bug#944738: [Openjdk] Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> - 2020-09-25 17:00 +0200
Bug#944738: [Openjdk] Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2020-09-25 17:20 +0200
Bug#944738: [Openjdk] Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> - 2020-09-25 18:30 +0200
Bug#944738: [Openjdk] Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> - 2020-09-25 18:50 +0200
Bug#944738: [Openjdk] Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> - 2020-09-25 18:50 +0200
Bug#944738: [Openjdk] Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2020-09-28 05:30 +0200
csiph-web