Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1026411
| From | Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist |
| Subject | Bug#944738: [Openjdk] Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base |
| Date | 2020-09-25 18:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ASZ4Z-2fw-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <z2pnX-1pI-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <ASXFT-1x7-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <ASYLE-296-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <z2pnX-1pI-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <ASYLE-296-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 06:22:33PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * tony mancill: > > > I had already prepared the NMU for openjdk-15 - building first without > > the patch and then with it so I could test with both - so I will go > > ahead and upload that package today. > > There's also an upstream change to honor SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH: > > commit 1a16a4b62829e54a4af5446ef15b981212a70718 > Author: Magnus Ihse Bursie <ihse@openjdk.org> > Date: Thu May 7 17:47:11 2020 +0200 > > 8244592: Start supporting SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH > > Reviewed-by: erikj > > It requires configuring with --with-source-date, I think. Oh, interesting. That could be very helpful for this. But we would have to be careful, as dh_strip_nondeterminism replaces timestamps with the date in the most recent debian/changelog entry, so we might have to exclude the relevant files from the dh_... invocation. Best wishes, Julian
Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base Bill Zaumen <bill.zaumen@gmail.com> - 2020-08-20 07:10 +0200
Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> - 2020-09-17 20:10 +0200
Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> - 2020-09-18 12:20 +0200
Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> - 2020-09-18 12:30 +0200
Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2020-09-18 16:20 +0200
Bug#944738: [Openjdk] Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base Tiago Daitx <tiago.daitx@canonical.com> - 2020-09-18 18:20 +0200
Bug#944738: [Openjdk] Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> - 2020-09-18 18:30 +0200
Bug#944738: [Openjdk] Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2020-09-21 07:10 +0200
Bug#944738: [Openjdk] Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> - 2020-09-21 11:10 +0200
Bug#944738: [Openjdk] Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2020-09-21 16:10 +0200
Bug#944738: [Openjdk] Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> - 2020-09-21 22:30 +0200
Bug#944738: [Openjdk] Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2020-09-22 08:00 +0200
Bug#944738: [Openjdk] Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> - 2020-09-22 11:10 +0200
Bug#944738: [Openjdk] Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2020-09-22 16:20 +0200
Bug#944738: [Openjdk] Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> - 2020-09-23 14:50 +0200
Bug#944738: [Openjdk] Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2020-09-23 20:20 +0200
Bug#944738: [Openjdk] Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> - 2020-09-23 22:00 +0200
Bug#944738: [Openjdk] Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2020-09-24 06:00 +0200
Bug#944738: [Openjdk] Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> - 2020-09-24 12:00 +0200
Bug#944738: [Openjdk] Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2020-09-25 02:30 +0200
Bug#944738: [Openjdk] Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> - 2020-09-25 17:00 +0200
Bug#944738: [Openjdk] Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2020-09-25 17:20 +0200
Bug#944738: [Openjdk] Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> - 2020-09-25 18:30 +0200
Bug#944738: [Openjdk] Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> - 2020-09-25 18:50 +0200
Bug#944738: [Openjdk] Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> - 2020-09-25 18:50 +0200
Bug#944738: [Openjdk] Bug#944738: jlink: Hash of module differs to expected hash recorded in java.base tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2020-09-28 05:30 +0200
csiph-web