Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #226464

Re: Homebuilt NAS: System Drive Filesystem?

From Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: Homebuilt NAS: System Drive Filesystem?
Date 2020-08-24 10:40 +0200
Message-ID <AHgbg-Xb-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <AGt0R-50K-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <AGxxw-7zg-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <AH2UF-1pA-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <AH5IR-35w-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Du, 23 aug 20, 14:26:15, David Christensen wrote:
> On 2020-08-23 11:22, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > 
> > I'll use "relatime" instead of "noatime." "Relatime" is said to
> > create less problems with software that needs dates/times when files,
> > etc. were last modified, accessed, etc.
> 
> I only use 'relatime' on data disks.  I would not use it on a root
> filesystem.   /boot might be okay.  (I let the installer set the boot, swap,
> and root entries in fstab and I am loath to touch them.)

Just in case you're not aware of it, 'relatime' is the default since 
Linux 2.6.30, see mount(8).

Just as a data point, I have been running all my disks with 'noatime', 
as far as I recall since before the default was changed and didn't 
notice any strange behaviour.

It might have been a motivation to stop using mboxes with mutt though 
(I'm using only Maildirs for any local storage), which is the often 
quoted example of applications that might break with noatime.

As far as I know also Debian's popularity-contest relies on access 
times, though it probably works fine with 'relatime'.

Kind regards,
Andrei
-- 
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Homebuilt NAS: System Drive Filesystem? Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2020-08-22 06:10 +0200
  Re: Homebuilt NAS: System Drive Filesystem? David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2020-08-22 11:00 +0200
    Re: Homebuilt NAS: System Drive Filesystem? Keith Bainbridge <ke1th3216@gmail.com> - 2020-08-23 02:50 +0200
      Re: Homebuilt NAS: System Drive Filesystem? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2020-08-23 10:20 +0200
    Re: Homebuilt NAS: System Drive Filesystem? Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2020-08-23 20:30 +0200
      Re: Homebuilt NAS: System Drive Filesystem? David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2020-08-23 23:30 +0200
        Re: Homebuilt NAS: System Drive Filesystem? Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2020-08-24 04:40 +0200
        Re: Homebuilt NAS: System Drive Filesystem? Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-08-24 10:40 +0200
          Re: Homebuilt NAS: System Drive Filesystem? David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2020-08-24 11:20 +0200
      Re: Homebuilt NAS: System Drive Filesystem? Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2020-08-24 01:00 +0200
        Re: Homebuilt NAS: System Drive Filesystem? David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2020-08-24 02:50 +0200
  Re: Homebuilt NAS: System Drive Filesystem? Jonathan Dowland <jon+debian-user@dow.land> - 2020-08-24 11:50 +0200
    Re: Homebuilt NAS: System Drive Filesystem? Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2020-08-24 18:30 +0200
      Re: Homebuilt NAS: System Drive Filesystem? Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-08-25 08:40 +0200
        Re: Homebuilt NAS: System Drive Filesystem? Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2020-08-25 19:10 +0200
    Re: Homebuilt NAS: System Drive Filesystem? David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2020-08-25 02:40 +0200

csiph-web