Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1022004
| From | Faidon Liambotis <paravoid@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist |
| Subject | Bug#956041: libmaxminddb: FTBFS (BD-Uninstallable): Build-Depends-Arch on pandoc |
| Date | 2020-08-18 20:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <AFeGB-17K-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <AFcbM-80g-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <zSBxU-4iW-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <AFeGB-17K-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <zSBxU-4iW-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <AFeGB-17K-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 05:41:26PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > As I explained, it's a matter of bootstrappability. Your package is not a leaf > package which is why this particular problem cannot be ignored. Helmut Grohne > (CC'ed) who is also working on keeping Debian bootstrappable will also be > able to explain this problem to you. > > Keeping Debian bootstrappable is important as it allows the whole system to be > bootstrapped from scratch with merely the sources available. Since pandoc is > a package which requires a large number of packages to be built before it > can be built itself, your package becomes a blocker when bootstrapping Debian > which is something that needs to be avoided. I understand the overall problem and I do think that Debian being bootstrappable is a worthy and meaningful goal for what it's worth! I'm not sure whether the package not being a leaf has that much to do with it. Honestly, I feel like blaming libmaxminddb for bootstrappability issues is a bit odd. The chain I think is: isc-dhcp-client(?) -> bind9 -> libmaxminddb -> pandoc -> <bunch of Haskell> with Haskell being particularly hard to bootstrap. Did I get that right? All that said, I don't want to be an obstacle here and would be happy to help, as long as what we end up doing makes overall sense :) > As for 12.1, there is already git-man which contains the packages for the manpages > for git. And since 12.1 is a recommendation and not a requirement, I do not think > how your argument holds up. Especially, since this simple change unbreaks an important > requirement in Debian. git-man has 171 manpages and is multiple megabytes in size. That's not comparable in the slightest with libmaxminddb which 2 manpages that are 10KB combined. I disagree that splitting off its two manpages into a separate package is the reasonable thing to do here, I'm afraid. Regards, Faidon
Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#956041: libmaxminddb: FTBFS (BD-Uninstallable): Build-Depends-Arch on pandoc Faidon Liambotis <paravoid@debian.org> - 2020-08-18 18:00 +0200
Bug#956041: libmaxminddb: FTBFS (BD-Uninstallable): Build-Depends-Arch on pandoc Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2020-08-18 19:10 +0200
Bug#956041: libmaxminddb: FTBFS (BD-Uninstallable): Build-Depends-Arch on pandoc Faidon Liambotis <paravoid@debian.org> - 2020-08-18 20:40 +0200
Bug#956041: libmaxminddb: FTBFS (BD-Uninstallable): Build-Depends-Arch on pandoc Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2020-08-18 21:00 +0200
Bug#956041: libmaxminddb: FTBFS (BD-Uninstallable): Build-Depends-Arch on pandoc Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de> - 2020-08-18 22:30 +0200
Bug#956041: libmaxminddb: FTBFS (BD-Uninstallable): Build-Depends-Arch on pandoc Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2020-08-18 23:00 +0200
Bug#956041: libmaxminddb: FTBFS (BD-Uninstallable): Build-Depends-Arch on pandoc Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de> - 2020-08-19 07:10 +0200
Bug#956041: libmaxminddb: FTBFS (BD-Uninstallable): Build-Depends-Arch on pandoc Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2020-08-19 17:10 +0200
Bug#956041: libmaxminddb: FTBFS (BD-Uninstallable): Build-Depends-Arch on pandoc Faidon Liambotis <paravoid@debian.org> - 2020-08-19 01:40 +0200
csiph-web