Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #226337
| From | David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Disks renamed after update to 'testing'...? |
| Date | 2020-08-20 22:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <AFZvP-40t-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <AEX33-7kr-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <AFE81-7Xs-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <AFNuF-5fj-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <AFUPw-1d5-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 2020-08-20 08:32, rhkramer@gmail.com wrote: > On Thursday, August 20, 2020 03:43:55 AM tomas@tuxteam.de wrote: >> Contraty to the other (very valid) points, my backups are always on >> a LUKS drive, no partition table. Rationale is, should I lose it, the >> less visible information the better. Best if it looks like a broken >> USB stick. No partition table looks (nearly) broken :-) I always use a partition table, to reduce the chance of confusing myself. ;-) > I have two questions: > > * I suppose that means you create the LUKS drive on, e.g., /dev/sdc rather > than, for example, /dev/sdc<n>? (I suppose that should be easy to do.) > > * But, I'm wondering, how much bit rot would it take to make the entire > backup unusable, and what kind of precautions do you take (or could be taken) > to avoid that? I have been pondering bit-rot mitigation on non-checksumming filesystems. Some people have mentioned md RAID. tomas has mentioned LUKS. I believe both of them add checksums to the contained contents. So, bit-rot within a container should be caught by the container driver. In the case of md RAID, the driver should respond by fetching the data from another drive and then dealing with the bad block(s); the application should not see any error (?). I assume LVM RAID would respond like md RAID (?). In the case of LUKS, the driver has no redundant data (?) and will have no choice but to report an error to the application (?). I would guess LVM non-RAID would behave similarly (?). For all three -- md, LUKS, LVM -- I don't know what happens for bit rot outside the container (e.g. in the container metadata). David
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Disks renamed after update to 'testing'...? "hobie of RMN" <hobie@rumormillnews.com> - 2020-08-18 01:50 +0200
Re: Disks renamed after update to 'testing'...? David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2020-08-18 03:30 +0200
Re: Disks renamed after update to 'testing'...? "hobie of RMN" <hobie@rumormillnews.com> - 2020-08-18 06:10 +0200
Re: Disks renamed after update to 'testing'...? john doe <johndoe65534@mail.com> - 2020-08-18 08:40 +0200
Re: Disks renamed after update to 'testing'...? didier gaumet <didier.gaumet@gmail.com> - 2020-08-18 10:30 +0200
Re: Disks renamed after update to 'testing'...? Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2020-08-18 11:40 +0200
Re: Disks renamed after update to 'testing'...? "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2020-08-18 12:20 +0200
Re: Disks renamed after update to 'testing'...? "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2020-08-18 11:40 +0200
Re: Disks renamed after update to 'testing'...? David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2020-08-18 12:10 +0200
Re: Disks renamed after update to 'testing'...? "Rick Thomas" <rick.thomas@pobox.com> - 2020-08-18 10:40 +0200
Re: Disks renamed after update to 'testing'...? Urs Thuermann <urs@isnogud.escape.de> - 2020-08-18 20:40 +0200
Re: Disks renamed after update to 'testing'...? David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2020-08-18 22:00 +0200
Re: Disks renamed after update to 'testing'...? Urs Thuermann <urs@isnogud.escape.de> - 2020-08-19 08:10 +0200
Re: Disks renamed after update to 'testing'...? David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2020-08-19 10:40 +0200
Re: Disks renamed after update to 'testing'...? Urs Thuermann <urs@isnogud.escape.de> - 2020-08-19 12:10 +0200
Re: Disks renamed after update to 'testing'...? David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2020-08-19 23:50 +0200
Re: Disks renamed after update to 'testing'...? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2020-08-20 09:50 +0200
Re: Disks renamed after update to 'testing'...? Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2020-08-20 12:20 +0200
Re: Disks renamed after update to 'testing'...? rhkramer@gmail.com - 2020-08-20 17:40 +0200
Re: Disks renamed after update to 'testing'...? David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2020-08-20 22:40 +0200
Re: Disks renamed after update to 'testing'...? Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2020-08-20 23:40 +0200
Re: Disks renamed after update to 'testing'...? Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2020-08-21 00:00 +0200
Re: Disks renamed after update to 'testing'...? David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2020-08-21 11:50 +0200
Re: Disks renamed after update to 'testing'...? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2020-08-21 10:40 +0200
Re: Disks renamed after update to 'testing'...? Urs Thuermann <urs@isnogud.escape.de> - 2020-08-19 09:00 +0200
csiph-web