Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #222397

Re: debsecan does not report a vulnerability?

From Victor Sudakov <vas@sibptus.ru>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: debsecan does not report a vulnerability?
Date 2020-05-12 06:00 +0200
Message-ID <A5ufg-45B-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <A3L0R-4o1-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <A4ZuN-2dT-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <A5aTf-OQ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <A5tjb-3xg-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <A5tCx-3SX-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

David Wright wrote:
> > On Monday, 11 May 2020 00:14:02 PDT Victor Sudakov wrote:
> > > 
> > > What do you use to track vulnerabilites in your Debian hosts? What's the
> > > general approach? Do we just rely upon unattended-upgrade to fetch and
> > > install patched packages for us?
> > 
> > Running unattended upgrades is generally a recommended way to keep the system 
> > up-to-date. It minimizes the time from update being published to installed.
> > 
> > I got interested and installed debsecan on my laptop. Here is what man says:
> > 
> >        Much like the official Debian security advisories, debsecan's
> >        vulnerability tracking is mostly based on source packages.
> >        
> > So it seems that it only knows about issues that were reported to source 
> > packages. The next logical step would be to grep bugtracker to see if this CVE 
> > was even reported to that package. 
> 
> Or you could check /usr/share/doc/openssl/changelog.Debian.gz
> though it only shows up in version 1.1.1d-0+deb10u3 of course.
> 
> $ zcat /usr/share/doc/openssl/changelog.Debian.gz | head

I'm looking for a more generic tool to audit all installed packages and
report vulnerable ones.
> $ 
> 
> (I'm not sure why the OP is still running the previous version.)

I downgraded it on purpose, to find a tool which would detect and report
this package as vulnerable. The "debsecan" turned out to be the wrong
tool.


-- 
Victor Sudakov,  VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN
2:5005/49@fidonet http://vas.tomsk.ru/

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

debsecan does not report a vulnerability? Victor Sudakov <vas@sibptus.ru> - 2020-05-07 11:30 +0200
  Re: debsecan does not report a vulnerability? Victor Sudakov <vas@sibptus.ru> - 2020-05-10 17:20 +0200
    Re: debsecan does not report a vulnerability? Ihor Antonov <ngor@antonovs.family> - 2020-05-10 21:10 +0200
      Re: debsecan does not report a vulnerability? Victor Sudakov <vas@sibptus.ru> - 2020-05-11 09:20 +0200
        Re: debsecan does not report a vulnerability? Ihor Antonov <ihor@antonovs.family> - 2020-05-12 05:00 +0200
          Re: debsecan does not report a vulnerability? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2020-05-12 05:20 +0200
            Re: debsecan does not report a vulnerability? Victor Sudakov <vas@sibptus.ru> - 2020-05-12 06:00 +0200
          Re: debsecan does not report a vulnerability? Victor Sudakov <vas@sibptus.ru> - 2020-05-12 05:50 +0200
          motivation for switching to Debian? (was: Re: debsecan does not  report a vulnerability?) Victor Sudakov <vas@sibptus.ru> - 2020-05-12 05:50 +0200
  Re: debsecan does not report a vulnerability? Victor Sudakov <vas@sibptus.ru> - 2020-07-07 09:30 +0200
    Re: debsecan does not report a vulnerability? l0f4r0@tuta.io - 2020-07-07 23:30 +0200
      Re: debsecan does not report a vulnerability? Victor Sudakov <vas@sibptus.ru> - 2020-07-08 04:20 +0200

csiph-web