Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #15476
| From | jt@toerring.de (Jens Thoms Toerring) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Is this ok to do? |
| Date | 2012-04-19 19:34 +0000 |
| Organization | Freie Universitaet Berlin |
| Message-ID | <9vb7llFfqbU1@mid.uni-berlin.de> (permalink) |
Hi,
sorry for the stupid subject but I had no good idea how to
condense it into a few words.
I have a method in a class A that calls a method of another class
B that in turn deletes the instance of class A from which it was
called (the B instance "owns" the instance of A and created it
calling 'new'). This feels a bit wrong since when the call of B's
method returns the instance of A has already ceased to exist. Ok,
I don't do anything in that method of A anymore after the call of
the B method returns (no use of 'this' or anything else that would
use data of A) but it still looks a bit dicy to me. Am I too pa-
ranoid and this is quite fine or are there real issues with this?
Best regards, Jens
--
\ Jens Thoms Toerring ___ jt@toerring.de
\__________________________ http://toerring.de
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is this ok to do? jt@toerring.de (Jens Thoms Toerring) - 2012-04-19 19:34 +0000
Re: Is this ok to do? Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.com> - 2012-04-19 22:01 +0200
Re: Is this ok to do? jt@toerring.de (Jens Thoms Toerring) - 2012-04-19 20:21 +0000
Re: Is this ok to do? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2012-04-20 06:17 +0000
Re: Is this ok to do? Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.com> - 2012-04-20 13:20 +0200
Re: Is this ok to do? jt@toerring.de (Jens Thoms Toerring) - 2012-04-20 17:00 +0000
csiph-web