Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.comp.os.windows-10 > #186426

Re: chkdsk finds errors, fails to correct them

From "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid>
Newsgroups alt.comp.os.windows-10
Subject Re: chkdsk finds errors, fails to correct them
Date 2025-08-01 14:18 +0200
Message-ID <9tnullx4qi.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> (permalink)
References <MPG.42f56c1ce16011bc9896b9@news.eternal-september.org> <106gm2l$17no$1@dont-email.me> <82ftllxci.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <106hbtf$5lju$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


On 2025-08-01 05:22, Paul wrote:
> On Thu, 7/31/2025 8:41 PM, Carlos E.R. wrote:
>> On 2025-07-31 23:09, Paul wrote:
>>> On Thu, 7/31/2025 1:04 PM, Jason wrote:
>>>> Now and again, I run chkdsk on partitions to look for
>>>> trouble. Lately, on C:, chkdsk reports bitmap errors and
>>>> asks if I want to restart to fix them offline. I do that
>>>> but chkdsk again reports errors upon restarting. This
>>>> happened three times in a row. What's up and should I
>>>> worry? BTW, C: is a 1G SSD should that make any
>>>> difference.
>>>>
>>>
>>> As you know, Microsoft on the one hand, claims the NTFS API
>>> has not changed in years, thus "everything is compatible"
>>> as they spin their new OSes. They refuse to change the NTFS
>>> release number.
>>>
>>> But, changes have been made, and they "aren't exactly compatible".
>>> A glaring example, is the ability to make 2MB clusters in W10/W11,
>>> which Windows 7 cannot read.
>>
>> There is another I can't remember... ah, "reparse points", you mentioned it later. Affects compressed directories, I think. Linux has problems with them.
>>
> 
> That's how Microsoft ensures that Linux never catches up :-)
> 
> I'm sure they don't do this on purpose. It's just an accident or something.

<https://www.genbeta.com/actualidad/microsoft-bloqueo-correo-desarrollador-libreoffice-al-intentar-buscar-solucion-se-encontro-sistema-desfasado>


Microsoft blocked the email account of a LibreOffice developer. When 
trying to find a solution, he encountered an outdated system.
Microsoft's support system was unable to provide an effective solution.

The already tense relationship between Microsoft and the LibreOffice 
community, the main open-source alternative to Office, may have added a 
new and frustrating chapter. Mike Kaganski, a developer of the free 
office suite, discovered this week that his Microsoft account had been 
suddenly blocked without a clear explanation. Worst of all, he only 
noticed the block when he was about to send an email to the project's 
developer list.

Microsoft's warning message was as brief as it was alarming: his account 
had been blocked for violating the terms of service. Kaganski, truly 
surprised, went so far as to publicly invite anyone to look at his email 
and try to detect any messages that were out of the ordinary, as most of 
them were technical messages about the development of LibreOffice.

Translated with DeepL.com (free version)


I understand this chap is a Libre Office contributor, in Windows.



-- 
Cheers, Carlos.

Back to alt.comp.os.windows-10 | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

chkdsk finds errors, fails to correct them Jason <jason_warren@INVALID.ieee.org> - 2025-07-31 13:04 -0400
  Re: chkdsk finds errors, fails to correct them T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-31 10:42 -0700
    Re: chkdsk finds errors, fails to correct them jason_warren <jason_warren@ieee.org> - 2025-07-31 13:44 -0400
      Re: chkdsk finds errors, fails to correct them T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-31 11:32 -0700
        Re: chkdsk finds errors, fails to correct them Philip Herlihy <nothing@invalid.com> - 2025-08-01 10:39 +0100
          Re: chkdsk finds errors, fails to correct them T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2025-08-01 04:27 -0700
          Re: chkdsk finds errors, fails to correct them Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-08-01 08:03 -0400
        Re: chkdsk finds errors, fails to correct them Jason <jason_warren@INVALID.ieee.org> - 2025-08-01 18:16 -0400
    Re: chkdsk finds errors, fails to correct them "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2025-08-01 18:25 +0100
  Re: chkdsk finds errors, fails to correct them Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-07-31 17:09 -0400
    Re: chkdsk finds errors, fails to correct them "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-08-01 02:41 +0200
      Re: chkdsk finds errors, fails to correct them Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-07-31 23:22 -0400
        Re: chkdsk finds errors, fails to correct them "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-08-01 14:18 +0200
          Re: chkdsk finds errors, fails to correct them T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2025-08-01 17:30 -0700
            Re: chkdsk finds errors, fails to correct them "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-08-02 14:20 +0200
              Re: chkdsk finds errors, fails to correct them T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2025-08-03 23:15 -0700
                Re: chkdsk finds errors, fails to correct them Hank Rogers <invalid@nospam.com> - 2025-08-04 07:53 +0000
                Re: chkdsk finds errors, fails to correct them T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2025-08-04 01:21 -0700

csiph-web