Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #4095
| From | Greg Russell <me@invalid.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: ext3 filesize problem |
| Date | 2012-02-04 05:23 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <9p3tnaFok3U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <jffm43$ieq$2@dont-email.me> <9p2rf0F4v8U1@mid.individual.net> <jghhkv$on1$1@dont-email.me> <9p3r5nF7s6U1@mid.individual.net> <jgid8b$vrm$1@dont-email.me> |
On Sat, 04 Feb 2012 05:47:06 +0100, Aragorn wrote in jgid8b$vrm$1@dont-email.me : > On Saturday 04 February 2012 05:40, Greg Russell conveyed the following > to comp.os.linux.misc... > >> On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 20:55:59 +0000, J G Miller wrote in >> jghhkv$on1$1@dont-email.me : >> >>> On Friday, February 3rd, 2012, at 19:39:13h +0000, Greg Russell wrote: >>> >>>> but why motion should limit an mpeg file to 2GB is still not >>>> understandable to me >>> >>> Well in another post, Stan has suggested the reason is due to the 32 >>> bit limit if you are using a 32 bit version of motion. >> >> Yes, ... and I find that reasoning to be inadequate and unconvincing. 2 >> GB is not a limit on a 32-bit ext3 filesystem. > > No, but it may be and often is the limit of /certain/ 32-bit > _applications_ [*]. It has nothing to do with the ext3 filesystem. > > > [*] The following pertains to web browsers and download utilities, but > it's a useful bit of information...: > http://www.kernel.org/faq/#largefiles No, it's not useful at all in explaining why motion limits itself to a 2GB output filesize on a filesystem that isn't 2GB-limited; it has no relation to the topic under discussion.
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
ext3 filesize problem Greg Russell <me@invalid.org> - 2012-01-21 23:53 +0000
Re: ext3 filesize problem J G Miller <miller@yoyo.ORG> - 2012-01-22 00:43 +0000
Re: ext3 filesize problem Stan Bischof <stan@worldbadminton.com> - 2012-01-23 16:24 +0000
Re: ext3 filesize problem J G Miller <miller@yoyo.ORG> - 2012-01-23 18:03 +0000
Re: ext3 filesize problem Greg Russell <me@invalid.org> - 2012-02-03 19:39 +0000
Re: ext3 filesize problem J G Miller <miller@yoyo.ORG> - 2012-02-03 20:55 +0000
Re: ext3 filesize problem Greg Russell <me@invalid.org> - 2012-02-04 04:40 +0000
Re: ext3 filesize problem Aragorn <stryder@telenet.be.invalid> - 2012-02-04 05:47 +0100
Re: ext3 filesize problem Greg Russell <me@invalid.org> - 2012-02-04 05:23 +0000
Re: ext3 filesize problem Aragorn <stryder@telenet.be.invalid> - 2012-02-04 06:57 +0100
Re: ext3 filesize problem Greg Russell <me@invalid.org> - 2012-02-04 07:14 +0000
Re: ext3 filesize problem Aragorn <stryder@telenet.be.invalid> - 2012-02-04 08:32 +0100
Re: ext3 filesize problem Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2012-02-04 09:15 +0100
Re: ext3 filesize problem Harold Stevens <wookie@limbo.localdomain> - 2012-02-04 05:07 -0600
Re: ext3 filesize problem Aragorn <stryder@telenet.be.invalid> - 2012-02-05 01:19 +0100
Re: ext3 filesize problem Greg Russell <me@invalid.org> - 2012-02-05 01:34 +0000
Re: ext3 filesize problem Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2012-02-04 07:47 -0600
Re: ext3 filesize problem Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2012-02-04 15:24 +0000
Re: ext3 filesize problem Greg Russell <me@invalid.org> - 2012-02-05 01:22 +0000
Re: ext3 filesize problem J G Miller <miller@yoyo.ORG> - 2012-02-05 01:58 +0000
Re: ext3 filesize problem Norman Peelman <npeelmandog@cfl.rr.com> - 2012-02-05 08:22 -0500
csiph-web