Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #550684

Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)

Show all headers | View raw

On Wednesday, February 3, 2016 at 10:27:43 PM UTC-5, nu...@bid.nes wrote:
> On Sunday, January 31, 2016 at 8:26:44 AM UTC-8, kenseto wrote:
> > IRT is a new theory of relativity. It includes  LET and SRT as subsets.
> 
>   Hence it also contains a superset that neither LET or SRT can describe, much less explain.
> 
>   Does IRT cover FTL travel of real matter? Does it explain how to do it?

IRT says that a clock second does not represent a universal interval of time in different frames and thus the concept of FTL is meaningless. 

> 
>   Does it cover FTL transmission of information? Does it explain how to do it?
> 
>   Does it also contain GRT? Does it explain the observed slowing of time near masses?

Model mechanics gives physical explanation for the GRT math.
> 
>   Does it describe gravity well enough to explain how to manipulate it as we do electromagnetism? Does it explain how to generate "antigravity"?

No antigravity  in IRT. Please read the essay on gravity in the following link:
http://www.modelmechanics.org/essayonDTG.pdf


> 
>   If the answer to any/all of those questions is "yes", give details here. Do not refer me to your paper again and tell me to find answers within.
> 
>   If the answer to any/all of those questions is "no", why should anyone waste time with your "IRT"?
> 
> 
>   Mark L. Fergerson

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 19:27 -0800
  Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 00:19 -0500
  Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-02-05 07:34 -0800

csiph-web