Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #57162
| From | "%" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.checkmate, alt.usenet.kooks |
| Subject | Re: HOW TO GET RID OF DEMOCRATS |
| Date | 2016-04-28 17:39 -0700 |
| Organization | Altopia Corp. - Usenet Access - www.altopia.com |
| Message-ID | <9br01g.u81.17.1@news.alt.net> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <Hi6Uy.40197$dD7.19870@fx21.iad><op.ygk8mpgstm21m2@benson.localhost> <PH8Uy.9959$Xg3.2680@fx27.iad><dod70gF6n2dU11@mid.individual.net><MPG.318b096bf3bc163598cfee@news.altopia.com><dod8m4F9gllU1@mid.individual.net> <nfrr92$j5g$4@dont-email.me><MPG.318b40d47a38982998cff0@news.altopia.com><nftsc5$j5g$14@dont-email.me><MPG.318c1f11258499ee98d010@news.altopia.com><nftvio$j5g$24@dont-email.me><MPG.318c2d865d44d58f98d014@news.altopia.com> <nfu3jn$2k8$2@dont-email.me><9bqpl0.h1n.19.1@news.alt.net> <dofo7eFms05U5@mid.individual.net> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
vallor wrote: > On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 15:50:33 -0700, % wrote: > >> Nadegda wrote: >>> On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 15:24:48 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: >>> >>>> In article <nftvio$j5g$24@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>>> says... >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 14:22:59 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> In article <nftsc5$j5g$14@dont-email.me>, >>>>>> nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 22:34:47 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In article <nfrr92$j5g$4@dont-email.me>, >>>>>>>> nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 01:52:05 +0000, vallor wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 18:38:20 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> In article <dod70gF6n2dU11@mid.individual.net>, >>>>>>>>>>> vallor@cultnix.org says... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 12:48:01 -0700, Colonel Edmund J. Burke >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/27/2016 10:09 AM, "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living >>>>>>>>>>>>> at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop >>>>>>>>>>>>> Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA >>>>>>>>>>>>> 15206-2117 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 13:04:41 -0400, Colonel Edmund J. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Burke <burkesgurlz@t-girls.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/27/2016 9:57 AM, "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 12:46:10 -0400, Colonel Edmund J. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Burke <burkesgurlz@t-girls.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/27/2016 9:44 AM, "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 12:04:29 -0400, Colonel Edmund J. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Burke <burkesgurlz@t-girls.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Give 'em some education and turn 'em into >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Republicans. YAY! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give people proper education and the next step is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> socialism. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> D'OH!!!!!!!!!!! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> YOU COMMIE FAG! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> communism isn't socialism. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> also, marx and engels were correct and are only proven >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more correct with each passing day, these days. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does that frighten you, that systems of economics are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> able to be modeled and predicted so long ago? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Marxism was disproved of late. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> when did that happen? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Capitalism is the only system that prevails. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL until when? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> until socialism, that is. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> well, because the "haves" decided to make education a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> commodity and not a right. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because its bylaws flow in the same vein as that of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> human selfishness. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> human selfishness is what, in turn, destroys capitalism >>>>>>>>>>>>>> eventually. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are proven wrong! >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> not really. you are proven to not understand marx and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> engels' theories about the progression of economic >>>>>>>>>>>>>> systems based on actual scientific and statistical data. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> You sound like a punk kid fresh outa political science >>>>>>>>>>>>> class, junior. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> And there is no way in hell that you have a real >>>>>>>>>>>> commission. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Because you sound like you've never been within five miles >>>>>>>>>>>> from a political classroom. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> But let's exercise that noggin of yours: By what mechanism >>>>>>>>>>>> does Capitalism (of any sort) ensure that all people born >>>>>>>>>>>> into (say) this USA of ours, have a job? Or for that >>>>>>>>>>>> matter, >>>>>>>>>>>> any kind of income? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Remember, automation is taking over, jobs have been >>>>>>>>>>>> offshored. We've had decades of "cut taxes on the rich to >>>>>>>>>>>> make new jobs", and that's clearly not helping. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hell, under Bush, how many bridges collapsed in the U.S.? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> As a bona-fide Real Capitalist(tm), I say to you: we're in >>>>>>>>>>>> for a rough ride if we don't change course. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_AFe--d-zMA >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> [groups snecked] >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Michael Moore did a fascinating film on the pitfalls of >>>>>>>>>>> capitalism. All of man's governing machinations are subject >>>>>>>>>>> to corruption sooner or later, and ours is clearly way off >>>>>>>>>>> course. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Small business capitalism is great. Even medium-sized. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It's the megacorps that continue to mess things up. Some of >>>>>>>>>> that is the MIC, as Eisenhower warned about. Some of it is >>>>>>>>>> too much influence on what passes for "the press" in our >>>>>>>>>> country nowadays. The Overton window is way out of wack -- >>>>>>>>>> yet it's never enough, and the way-right folks continue to >>>>>>>>>> "appeal to the refs". >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> There was this guy once that coined a term for when >>>>>>>>>> corporations ran the government, which he thought was a good >>>>>>>>>> idea. His name was Mussolini, and the word was "fascism". >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> After all, the trains ran on time, right? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> What good does that do you when the destination is a place >>>>>>>>> like Auschwitz? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Time to throw the switch and reroute this country away from >>>>>>>>> Right Wing Nutlandia and towards Sanders's Scandinavia West. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Another round of "campaign finance reform," after Citizens >>>>>>>> United? Politicians owe their very existence to the corrupted >>>>>>>> system. They're not about to give the subject anything but lip >>>>>>>> service. The Government has been bought and paid for by >>>>>>>> scumbags like the Koch brothers and all their >>>>>>>> intricately-weaved organizations and other evil entities. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If so; if the soapbox and ballot box currently being tried don't >>>>>>> work; then I guess it would be time for that Constitutional >>>>>>> convention someone mentioned recently, even though convening one >>>>>>> would mean opening Pandora's box. >>>>>> >>>>>> Fat chance that THAT would happen. The Rich Elite have invested >>>>>> far too much money and effort into corrupting the current system >>>>>> to their liking. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> How do you fix that without the shit seriously hitting the >>>>>>>> fan? If that happens, a stroke of the pen and COG, martial >>>>>>>> law, and FEMA camps are ready to lock up anybody "they" see >>>>>>>> fit. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Er, what? Don't tell me you, apparently a liberal, bought into >>>>>>> that right- wing wackjob Alex Jones's Jade Helm konspiracy >>>>>>> kookery? >>>>>> >>>>>> Alex Jones is indeed, a whackjob, but he's learned how to profit >>>>>> from it. Having said that, *some* of the things he says have >>>>>> *some* credibility. If you dig into the Continuity of >>>>>> Government (COG) plans already in place, you'll see that all it >>>>>> takes is a stroke of a pen to rock everybody's world. What >>>>>> happens after that, is anybody's guess, but the military will >>>>>> have the "right" to barge into our homes without a warrant if >>>>>> they're directed to, and haul off anybody who happens to be on >>>>>> the wrong list. I think it's a safe assumption that being too >>>>>> outspoken about the Government could land someone on that list. >>>>>> >>>>>> Not saying any of this is going to happen, but the process is >>>>>> already in place. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> The notion that the Constitution still gives us any rights is >>>>>>>> an illusion that only exists until someone gives the go ahead >>>>>>>> to take them away. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And that would be the time to reach for the *fourth* box. >>>>>> >>>>>> That's when you have to decide to "cooperate" with the >>>>>> "authorities," or go out in a blaze of glory, and take a few of >>>>>> 'em with you. It's a no- win situation either way. >>>>> >>>>> Yeah, that's what happened to ol' George Washington and his crew >>>>> -- they "went out in a blaze of glory and took a few redcoats >>>>> with 'em". >>>>> >>>>> Where did you go to school that you learned this bit of our >>>>> nation's proud history, kook? >>>> >>>> You're talking about history, Ko0kie. I'm talking about the >>>> future. George Washington wasn't facing down a firmly entrenched >>>> army with the home court advantage, and the high tech implements >>>> of destruction that our Government has at it's disposal. >>> >>> That firmly entrenched army you speak of took, to the last person, a >>> loyalty oath to defend the Constitution against enemies "foreign and >>> domestic". Large chunks of it ought logically to be on *our* side >>> against any attempt to usurp our Constitutional rights. Any >>> President or other leader that tries the sort of stuff Alex Jones >>> rants and raves about will quickly find his forces on one side of a >>> civil war, and hopefully the outnumbered side at that. >>> >>> The only weapons systems with tightly centralized control, >>> meanwhile, are the nukes with their arming codes. Whichever side >>> has the "football" will have those weapons -- but will they dare >>> use them inside their own borders? Any victory obtained by such >>> means would clearly be Pyrrhic. One hopes sanity would prevail and >>> those bombs would stay safe and snug in their silos for the >>> duration. >>> >>> I'd actually be more worried about the rank-and-file civilian >>> *police*, who don't seem particularly oathbound to the Constitution >>> *or* particularly loyal to the average Joe-on-the-street. These >>> days they're equipped with all kinds of military-surplus hardware, >>> too. Though in a fight between those goofs and the Army I'd bet on >>> the Army. >>> >>>> BTW... your tax dollars helped arm our potential enemy with the >>>> biggest and badest armaments in the world, and the planes and >>>> rockets to deliver them. How would you win against a military >>>> force that owns the sky? How would you hide from a government >>>> that knows more about you than you do, and has video cameras and >>>> facial recognition at its disposal? >>> >>> The same way Vietnam, Afghanistan, and Iraq did, if it came down to >>> underequipped guerillas versus a professional military. Make the >>> occupation so expensive they simply give up eventually. Come to >>> think of it, didn't Washington use such methods at times against the >>> redcoats? >> >> and canada got their independence with no fight at all > > What kind of "independence" is it when you still have QE as your > monarch? > > "Technically speaking, Queen Elizabeth is the Sovereign of the > parliamentary democracy and constitutional monarchy of Canada. Unless > you frequently use Canadian money or are particularly savvy with > regard to Canadian politics, you may not have known they had any kind > of monarchy." > > Bonus fact: One stained glass window at the Empress hotel in > Victoria, BC, shows the sun _setting_ on the British Empire. > > Quite apt -- yet it is still named "British" Columbia. Heh. maybe you didn't read what i said , or i said it in a way you didn't understand
Back to alt.checkmate | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: HOW TO GET RID OF DEMOCRATS "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-04-27 18:38 -0700
Re: HOW TO GET RID OF DEMOCRATS vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-28 01:52 +0000
Re: HOW TO GET RID OF DEMOCRATS "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 18:54 -0700
Re: HOW TO GET RID OF DEMOCRATS Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-04-28 02:07 +0000
Re: HOW TO GET RID OF DEMOCRATS "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 19:19 -0700
Re: HOW TO GET RID OF DEMOCRATS vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-28 02:21 +0000
Re: HOW TO GET RID OF DEMOCRATS Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-04-28 02:30 +0000
Re: HOW TO GET RID OF DEMOCRATS "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-04-27 22:37 -0700
Re: HOW TO GET RID OF DEMOCRATS "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-04-27 22:34 -0700
Re: HOW TO GET RID OF DEMOCRATS "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-04-28 01:43 -0400
Re: HOW TO GET RID OF DEMOCRATS vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-28 06:11 +0000
Re: HOW TO GET RID OF DEMOCRATS Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-04-28 20:38 +0000
Re: HOW TO GET RID OF DEMOCRATS "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-04-28 14:22 -0700
Re: HOW TO GET RID OF DEMOCRATS Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-04-28 21:33 +0000
Re: HOW TO GET RID OF DEMOCRATS "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-04-28 15:24 -0700
Re: HOW TO GET RID OF DEMOCRATS Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-04-28 22:41 +0000
Re: HOW TO GET RID OF DEMOCRATS "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-04-28 15:50 -0700
Re: HOW TO GET RID OF DEMOCRATS vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-29 00:29 +0000
Re: HOW TO GET RID OF DEMOCRATS "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-04-28 17:39 -0700
Re: HOW TO GET RID OF DEMOCRATS "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-04-28 18:38 -0700
Re: HOW TO GET RID OF DEMOCRATS "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-04-28 18:42 -0700
Re: HOW TO GET RID OF DEMOCRATS snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-04-29 08:55 +0100
Re: HOW TO GET RID OF DEMOCRATS snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-04-29 08:52 +0100
Re: HOW TO GET RID OF DEMOCRATS "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-04-28 18:38 -0700
Re: HOW TO GET RID OF DEMOCRATS Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-04-29 04:05 +0000
Re: HOW TO GET RID OF DEMOCRATS snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-04-29 09:04 +0100
Re: HOW TO GET RID OF DEMOCRATS "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-04-29 01:52 -0700
Re: HOW TO GET RID OF DEMOCRATS snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-04-29 10:31 +0100
csiph-web