Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #9292

Re: Fun with member-function pointers

Show all headers | View raw

"Andrey Tarasevich" <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> wrote in message 
news:j335g1$qs3$1@dont-email.me...
> Default User wrote:
>> If this is still legal, then I'd be on pretty firm ground with my plan 
>> for the actual code.
>
> The code you have in your example is perfectly legal, with perfectly 
> defined behavior.

Ok. That would certainly make the code simpler and cut development time for 
future modules (although of the copy-and-paste variety). Mainly it would aid 
maintenance if any change to the map and call system were needed. Changing 
in one place rather than ten or more would be a good thing.

> Again, beware of broken compilers that might not handle it correctly. But 
> for your specific example I don't expect any surprises from the compiler.

VS 2010 builds the example without complaint. Results are what I would want.

> Keep in mind though, that one restriction imposed on such use of 
> `static_cast` is that the base class should be unambiguous  and 
> non-virtual in the derived class. (I was wrong to say earlier that virtual 
> inheritance in not a problem in this case).

I don't intend to use either of the inheritance types that you mentioned.

Thank you very much for your analysis and comments.



Brian

Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Fun with member-function pointers "Default User" <defaultuserbr@yahoo.com> - 2011-08-22 16:41 -0500
  Re: Fun with member-function pointers Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-08-22 19:25 -0400
    Re: Fun with member-function pointers "Default User" <defaultuserbr@yahoo.com> - 2011-08-22 19:06 -0500
  Re: Fun with member-function pointers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-08-23 07:09 +0000
    Re: Fun with member-function pointers Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-08-23 08:04 -0400
      Re: Fun with member-function pointers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-08-23 13:34 +0000
        Re: Fun with member-function pointers Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-08-23 13:02 -0400
      Re: Fun with member-function pointers Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-23 19:12 -0700
    Re: Fun with member-function pointers Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-23 18:51 -0700
  Re: Fun with member-function pointers Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.com> - 2011-08-23 09:07 +0200
    Re: Fun with member-function pointers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-08-23 10:09 +0000
      Re: Fun with member-function pointers Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.com> - 2011-08-23 15:04 +0200
    Re: Fun with member-function pointers "Default User" <defaultuserbr@yahoo.com> - 2011-08-23 10:36 -0500
      Re: Fun with member-function pointers Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-23 18:46 -0700
        Re: Fun with member-function pointers "Default User" <defaultuserbr@yahoo.com> - 2011-08-24 09:33 -0500
          Re: Fun with member-function pointers Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-24 08:32 -0700
            Re: Fun with member-function pointers "Default User" <defaultuserbr@yahoo.com> - 2011-08-24 11:15 -0500
              Re: Fun with member-function pointers Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-24 09:30 -0700
      Re: Fun with member-function pointers Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.com> - 2011-08-24 12:27 +0200
        Re: Fun with member-function pointers Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-24 06:46 -0700
          Re: Fun with member-function pointers Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2011-08-24 18:57 +0200
            Re: Fun with member-function pointers Paul <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-24 13:08 -0700
              Re: Fun with member-function pointers Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-24 13:44 -0700
                Re: Fun with member-function pointers Paul <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-25 04:23 -0700
                Re: Fun with member-function pointers Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-25 07:31 -0700
                Re: Fun with member-function pointers Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-25 08:21 -0700
                Re: Fun with member-function pointers Paul <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-25 10:50 -0700
                Re: Fun with member-function pointers Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-25 13:57 +0100
                Re: Fun with member-function pointers Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-25 14:08 +0100
                Re: Fun with member-function pointers Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-25 07:32 -0700
                Re: Fun with member-function pointers Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-25 15:45 +0100
                Re: Fun with member-function pointers Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-25 07:48 -0700
    Re: Fun with member-function pointers Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-23 18:43 -0700
  Re: Fun with member-function pointers Paul <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-23 03:49 -0700
    Re: Fun with member-function pointers Paul <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-23 06:44 -0700
  Re: Fun with member-function pointers Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-23 18:28 -0700
  Re: Fun with member-function pointers Jeff Flinn <TriumphSprint2000@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-25 11:29 -0400

csiph-web