Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #8357
| From | Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: Implicit convervsion of bool to int: why? |
| Date | 2011-07-31 13:48 +0300 |
| Organization | Tidorum Ltd |
| Message-ID | <99kq78Flm0U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <ivrll6$jh0$1@dont-email.me> <ael4275glbj0abvp20jbrm9qivttojbnv8@4ax.com> <ivtqc2$ics$1@dont-email.me> <99i436FcfaU1@mid.individual.net> <j12q6h$1b3$1@dont-email.me> |
HonestAbe wrote:
> Niklas Holsti wrote:
>> MikeP wrote:
>>> Robert Wessel wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 04:29:14 -0500, "MikeP" <mp011011@some.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Why can bool types be implicitly converted to ints?
>> ...
>>>> There are languages which have no implicit conversions.
>>> The Haskell, Scheme, OCaml set, yes?
>> For an example of a language without implicit conversions, from the
>> same programming paradigm as C++ (imperative, procedural), take Ada.
>
> "Take Ada" and... what?
Did you have trouble with my grammar? MikeP was asking (indirectly,
perhaps) for examples of languages without implicit conversions. So I
said, "take Ada as an example". Clear now?
> Why don't YOU take Ada, and I'll take the hot chick!. :P
I already took Ada. Since about 1985 it still is the language that fits
me best, thanks for asking.
I trust you and the hot chick are having a good time, too.
--
Niklas Holsti
Tidorum Ltd
niklas holsti tidorum fi
. @ .
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Implicit convervsion of bool to int: why? "MikeP" <mp011011@some.org> - 2011-07-16 04:29 -0500
Re: Implicit convervsion of bool to int: why? Krice <paulkp@mbnet.fi> - 2011-07-16 02:37 -0700
Re: Implicit convervsion of bool to int: why? "MikeP" <mp011011@some.org> - 2011-07-16 04:43 -0500
Re: Implicit convervsion of bool to int: why? BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-16 02:54 -0700
Re: Implicit convervsion of bool to int: why? Abhishek Padmanabh <abhishek.padmanabh@gmail.com> - 2011-07-16 18:52 +0100
Re: Implicit convervsion of bool to int: why? BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-16 23:03 -0700
Re: Implicit convervsion of bool to int: why? Abhishek Padmanabh <abhishek.padmanabh@gmail.com> - 2011-07-17 09:02 +0100
Re: Implicit convervsion of bool to int: why? BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-17 02:04 -0700
Re: Implicit convervsion of bool to int: why? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2011-07-16 22:28 -0500
Re: Implicit convervsion of bool to int: why? "MikeP" <mp011011@some.org> - 2011-07-17 00:02 -0500
Re: Implicit convervsion of bool to int: why? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2011-07-17 02:04 -0500
Re: Implicit convervsion of bool to int: why? "MikeP" <mp011011@some.org> - 2011-07-17 05:38 -0500
Re: Implicit convervsion of bool to int: why? "MikeP" <mp011011@some.org> - 2011-07-20 05:14 -0500
Re: Implicit convervsion of bool to int: why? Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> - 2011-07-30 13:18 +0300
Re: Implicit convervsion of bool to int: why? Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> - 2011-07-31 13:48 +0300
Re: Implicit convervsion of bool to int: why? James Kanze <james.kanze@gmail.com> - 2011-07-20 11:08 -0700
csiph-web