Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #7863
| From | "Bo Persson" <bop@gmb.dk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: removing constness of a true const |
| Date | 2011-07-16 08:32 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <98cpj0FmsU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <1e55c267-2789-498c-a5a1-f56e499336e5@z12g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> <ivn7kt$2t9r$1@news.ett.com.ua> <47b1098f-e550-424b-acd3-a26d2e419b4d@12g2000yqr.googlegroups.com> <9895ljF70aU1@mid.individual.net> <ivno4h$c7d$1@dont-email.me> |
Victor Bazarov wrote: > On 7/14/2011 5:33 PM, Bo Persson wrote: >> siddhu wrote: >>> On Jul 14, 1:05 pm, "Balog Pal"<p...@lib.hu> wrote: >>>> "siddhu"<siddharth....@gmail.com> >>>> >>>>> I guess removing constness of a true const( I guess it is also >>>>> called bitwise const ) using const_cast is undefined behavior. >>>>> Can you please give an example of a true const and may be a >>>>> sample code which exhibits undefined behavior by removing >>>>> constness of a true const. >>>> >>>> Removing constness is well defined. But actually modifying >>>> non-mutable member of a const object is UB. By any means, >>>> including the use of pointer/ref from const_cast. >>> >>> Thanks Balog! >>> Does that mean removing constness of 'this' in const member >>> function is an UB? >> >> It is if the object is really const. >> >> Suppose the data is stored in a ROM. What happens when you try to >> change it? > > I see two concepts here, removing of 'const' and changing. I don't > think that the former is the same as the latter, or is it? > > V Right, casting away const as such is ok, as long as you don't use it for anything non-const. My point was more that class objects can very well be read-only. Trying to change them will then have an undefined result. Bo Persson
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
removing constness of a true const siddhu <siddharth.sng@gmail.com> - 2011-07-14 08:07 -0700
Re: removing constness of a true const Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-07-14 11:55 -0400
Re: removing constness of a true const siddhu <siddharth.sng@gmail.com> - 2011-07-14 09:25 -0700
Re: removing constness of a true const Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-07-14 16:18 -0400
Re: removing constness of a true const "Balog Pal" <pasa@lib.hu> - 2011-07-15 01:18 +0200
Re: removing constness of a true const Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-07-15 08:17 -0400
Re: removing constness of a true const "Balog Pal" <pasa@lib.hu> - 2011-07-15 18:04 +0200
Re: removing constness of a true const Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-16 08:36 +1200
Re: removing constness of a true const "Balog Pal" <pasa@lib.hu> - 2011-07-16 02:00 +0200
Re: removing constness of a true const Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2011-07-15 16:08 -0500
Re: removing constness of a true const Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-16 09:30 +1200
Re: removing constness of a true const "Balog Pal" <pasa@lib.hu> - 2011-07-14 19:05 +0200
Re: removing constness of a true const siddhu <siddharth.sng@gmail.com> - 2011-07-14 12:05 -0700
Re: removing constness of a true const "Bo Persson" <bop@gmb.dk> - 2011-07-14 23:33 +0200
Re: removing constness of a true const Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-07-14 17:46 -0400
Re: removing constness of a true const "Bo Persson" <bop@gmb.dk> - 2011-07-16 08:32 +0200
Re: removing constness of a true const "Johannes Schaub (litb)" <schaub.johannes@googlemail.com> - 2011-07-15 15:02 +0200
Re: removing constness of a true const Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-07-15 09:54 -0400
csiph-web